Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi . I bought this a little while ago in a job lot. It came with a lovely Smiths dress watch, it didn't look much and I thought it was just added to make up the numbers. After cleaning it and making it run  I kind of like it in a beater sort of way. Ive tried to date it, but I'm coming up short.  All I have is Oberon Watch Company, may have been just one of their dial names. Constructa, and Interpol is also mentioned if anyone has one of those. Ronda movement ? RG is printed on the barrel Bridge but nothing  else relavant. Thanks

20220415_151616.jpg

20220415_151948.jpg

Posted
Just now, Neverenoughwatches said:

Wow that old ! Will I find it on ranfft. Then if I need a mainspring etc. And I might be able to get some history from calibre Someone suggested a ronda . Thank you Watchmaker 

Al it has on it is RG

Posted

Hi again @Neverenoughwatches

Information on Ebosa is sparse and Ackro doesn't appear in Mikrolisk's comprehensive list of trademarks.

There's some basic information at https://watch-wiki.org/index.php?title=Ebosa_S.A. if you let your browser take the strain on translation. Could the 'RG' signify R.Glocker since this family owned Ebosa?

Maybe to confirm you have an Ebosa - and assuming this is a 10.5 ligne* sized movement too - then take a look at the keyless works. [*Bestfit lists the 65 as a 10.5 ligne movement but Ranfft indicates it also came in an 11.5 ligne size].

This is the silhouette of the keyless works from Bestfit:
image.png.0512873306abd99b04085a6031864705.png

You ask if I've worked on this movement type ... and I don't believe I have. However given your post history on this forum indicating a good experience level I don't think this movement will throw up challenges. Just take pics as you go along in the disassembly since information is clearly sparse.

Noting that Cousins does stock a few parts for the Ebosa.

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
10 hours ago, WatchMaker said:

Hi again @Neverenoughwatches

Information on Ebosa is sparse and Ackro doesn't appear in Mikrolisk's comprehensive list of trademarks.

There's some basic information at https://watch-wiki.org/index.php?title=Ebosa_S.A. if you let your browser take the strain on translation. Could the 'RG' signify R.Glocker since this family owned Ebosa?

  - and assuming this is a 10.5 ligne* sized movement too - then take a look at the keyless works. [*Bestfit lists the 65 as a 10.5 ligne movement but Ranfft indicates it also came in an 11.5 ligne size].

This is the silhouette of the keyless works from Bestfit:
image.png.0512873306abd99b04085a6031864705.png

You ask if I've worked on this movement type ... and I don't believe I have. However given your post history on this forum indicating a good experience level I don't think this movement will throw up challenges. Just take pics as you go along in the disassembly since information is clearly sparse.

Noting that Cousins does stock a few parts for the Ebosa.

Thank you Watchmaker. I found it on ranfft, the same movement exactly bang on thank you apart from the long indicator on the regulator, mine doesn't have. It just needed a clean really and has been running well for a while now with good amplitude. It was good to work on, no problems. Needs a new crystal though. Only been repairing 6 months maybe on and off and only been on the forum just over a week, my posing is a bit prolific tbh as I do enjoy it. I appreciate  the time you've taken to help me date it, very kind of you.

Edited by Neverenoughwatches
Posted
On 4/16/2022 at 5:20 PM, Neverenoughwatches said:

Hi . I bought this a little while ago in a job lot. It came with a lovely Smiths dress watch, it didn't look much and I thought it was just added to make up the numbers. After cleaning it and making it run  I kind of like it in a beater sort of way. Ive tried to date it, but I'm coming up short.  All I have is Oberon Watch Company, may have been just one of their dial names. Constructa, and Interpol is also mentioned if anyone has one of those. Ronda movement ? RG is printed on the barrel Bridge but nothing  else relavant. Thanks

20220415_151616.jpg

20220415_151948.jpg

 

 

Interesting topic, @Neverenoughwatches and here are my contributions to the brand names you mention:

First up, my Ackro running on a 1j Baumgartner 866 with crown at “4”. The wordmark typeface is slightly different from yours, but I’ve little doubt they are the same brand. Some previous research (now lost) on mine indicated that the “Ackro” name was given to watches imported and sold by Gaumont Watch Co of Manchester, England.

Next up, my Constructa running on a 21j Ebosa 65. IIRC, Constructa is, or was, the company owned by Mondaine for the production of watches with pin lever movements.

Last up of this unholy trinity is my Interpol, again with the mighty 1j Baumgartner 866. An awful watch which, with some hundreds of more deserving cases, I’ve never been in a hurry to have restored, nor am I likely to.

And now, at the risk of courting controversy, I’d like to return to the movement in your own Ackro and suggest that, rather than an Ebosa 65, it more closely resembles an Oberon. To all intents and purposes these movements look pretty much identical apart from minor differences to the balance cock which perhaps become more apparent when viewed side by side as per these two Ranfft images:

bidfun-db Archive: Watch Movements: Oberon (ranfft.de)

bidfun-db Archive: Watch Movements: Ebosa 65 (ranfft.de)

including the semi-circular cut-out at the end of the balance cock which, in the case of the Oberon, is shorter and deeper than that of the Ebosa 65. Unfortunately Ranfft doesn’t show an image of the Oberon’s keyless works, and a movement holder tab is obscuring the cut-out of your movement. Also, whilst not wishing to rain on anyone’s parade, I would add a note of caution to the extent that whilst Ranfft dates his illustration of the Ebosa 65 to around 1955, it is generally acknowledged that such movements could continue in use long after the specific example shown in his archive. For what it’s worth, the dial style of your own watch suggests to me a date somewhere between the late ‘60s and the mid-‘70s.

To conclude this yawn-tastic post, perhaps you’ll forgive me if I include some final images, firstly of my 21j Oberon movement which lives inside a Josmar and, lastly, of my only example of a watch made by the little-documented Oberon Watch Co, inside which lives, er, a 17j Brac 903 (!)

Regards.

Ackro v.2.jpg

Constructa 2 v.3.jpg

Interpol v.2.jpg

Josmar G.p. 21j Oberon 2019 v.3.jpg

Oberon after v.3.jpg

Oberon Brac 903 after v.3.jpg

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, balaton said:

 

 

Interesting topic, @Neverenoughwatches and here are my contributions to the brand names you mention:

First up, my Ackro running on a 1j Baumgartner 866 with crown at “4”. The wordmark typeface is slightly different from yours, but I’ve little doubt they are the same brand. Some previous research (now lost) on mine indicated that the “Ackro” name was given to watches imported and sold by Gaumont Watch Co of Manchester, England.

Next up, my Constructa running on a 21j Ebosa 65. IIRC, Constructa is, or was, the company owned by Mondaine for the production of watches with pin lever movements.

Last up of this unholy trinity is my Interpol, again with the mighty 1j Baumgartner 866. An awful watch which, with some hundreds of more deserving cases, I’ve never been in a hurry to have restored, nor am I likely to.

And now, at the risk of courting controversy, I’d like to return to the movement in your own Ackro and suggest that, rather than an Ebosa 65, it more closely resembles an Oberon. To all intents and purposes these movements look pretty much identical apart from minor differences to the balance cock which perhaps become more apparent when viewed side by side as per these two Ranfft images:

bidfun-db Archive: Watch Movements: Oberon (ranfft.de)

bidfun-db Archive: Watch Movements: Ebosa 65 (ranfft.de)

including the semi-circular cut-out at the end of the balance cock which, in the case of the Oberon, is shorter and deeper than that of the Ebosa 65. Unfortunately Ranfft doesn’t show an image of the Oberon’s keyless works, and a movement holder tab is obscuring the cut-out of your movement. Also, whilst not wishing to rain on anyone’s parade, I would add a note of caution to the extent that whilst Ranfft dates his illustration of the Ebosa 65 to around 1955, it is generally acknowledged that such movements could continue in use long after the specific example shown in his archive. For what it’s worth, the dial style of your own watch suggests to me a date somewhere between the late ‘60s and the mid-‘70s.

To conclude this yawn-tastic post, perhaps you’ll forgive me if I include some final images, firstly of my 21j Oberon movement which lives inside a Josmar and, lastly, of my only example of a watch made by the little-documented Oberon Watch Co, inside which lives, er, a 17j Brac 903 (!)

Regards.

Ackro v.2.jpg

Constructa 2 v.3.jpg

Interpol v.2.jpg

Josmar G.p. 21j Oberon 2019 v.3.jpg

Oberon after v.3.jpg

Oberon Brac 903 after v.3.jpg

That's really good of you balaton. Tbh I did think it looked 20 years younger than 1955. What about the only lettering on the mainplate rg. It was suggest r glocker  the owner of ebosa. I will check the cut out on the balance  cock to see if its there. Would there be some connection though between obosa  and oberon , as the movement design is so close. And Manchester  is only miles from me, so it hasn't come far. I will check out the sellers  location as well. You've got me digging now 👍

Edited by Neverenoughwatches
Posted
7 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

That's really good of you balaton. Tbh I did think it looked 20 years younger than 1955. What about the only lettering on the mainplate rg. It was suggest r glocker  the owner of ebosa. I will check the cut out on the balance  cock to see if its there. Would there be some connection though between obosa  and oberon , as the movement design is so close. And Manchester  is only miles from me, so it hasn't come far. I will check out the sellers  location as well. You've got me digging now 👍

You’re welcome.

I’m afraid I can’t say whether the “RG” has any significance to Ebosa’s owner or whether it’s purely a coincidence.

However, I can say that other makes of pin lever movements also have different combinations of two letters, particularly Louis Newmark’s original Newmark Watch Co (not the resurrected company of the same name) which was based in Croydon. For a while in the 1950s they made their own calibres which, in my experience, all have various two-letter combos, thought to be factory production identifiers for internal reference purposes only.  

In addition, as you’ll see in the attached image, the BFG 866 in my dreadful Interpol watch also has two letters (GR) stamped on it which similarly seem to bear no discernible relation to either Baumgartner or Ilona Watch Co.

I’m not immediately aware of any historical connection between Ebosa and Oberon, the latter company being started by Erwin Rudolf in 1951. However, such is the apparent paucity of documented facts about both companies, it would be somewhat cavalier to dismiss it out of hand.

Regards.

 

Interpol BFG 866 v.2.jpg

  • Thanks 1
Posted
6 hours ago, balaton said:

You’re welcome.

I’m afraid I can’t say whether the “RG” has any significance to Ebosa’s owner or whether it’s purely a coincidence.

However, I can say that other makes of pin lever movements also have different combinations of two letters, particularly Louis Newmark’s original Newmark Watch Co (not the resurrected company of the same name) which was based in Croydon. For a while in the 1950s they made their own calibres which, in my experience, all have various two-letter combos, thought to be factory production identifiers for internal reference purposes only.  

In addition, as you’ll see in the attached image, the BFG 866 in my dreadful Interpol watch also has two letters (GR) stamped on it which similarly seem to bear no discernible relation to either Baumgartner or Ilona Watch Co.

I’m not immediately aware of any historical connection between Ebosa and Oberon, the latter company being started by Erwin Rudolf in 1951. However, such is the apparent paucity of documented facts about both companies, it would be somewhat cavalier to dismiss it out of hand.

Regards.

 

Interpol BFG 866 v.2.jpg

Thank you for all that information.  You really know your history. I love to repair but I am only a beginner, but enjoy the history behind the brands just as much. I find that knowing the history helps me with my buying, I mostly repair vintage Swiss, i have a thing for Oris . But also history of British makers, the Smiths and Rolex story of Everest was fascinating. Incidentally the design of your BFG 866, with the long sweeping click, and the 3 studded balance cock I've seen used in Smiths Empire,  Ingersoll and Services. I found the Ingersol history good as well linking with Smiths for a short time.

  • Like 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Thank you for all that information.  You really know your history. I love to repair but I am only a beginner, but enjoy the history behind the brands just as much. I find that knowing the history helps me with my buying, I mostly repair vintage Swiss, i have a thing for Oris . But also history of British makers, the Smiths and Rolex story of Everest was fascinating. Incidentally the design of your BFG 866, with the long sweeping click, and the 3 studded balance cock I've seen used in Smiths Empire,  Ingersoll and Services. I found the Ingersol history good as well linking with Smiths for a short time.

I'm glad that you found my ramblings to be of some interest. And yes, delving into the histories of many long-gone original brands, including those you've mentioned, can be rewarding if not really, really frustrating much of the time.

Regards.

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If he was much younger and some sort of sports player it wouldn't be a problem. They would be in there and doing surgery and he'd be back on the field in no time. Unfortunately when you get older little things are bad and big things can be really bad so not good at all.
    • Where I work everything incoming watches whatever detailed descriptions are taken entered into a computer program and photograph of each item. Then ideally although it depends on who's doing the paperwork detailed descriptions can be quite good other times there lacking. Like I really like it with pocket watches if they would record the serial number it avoids confusion later on. Then when watch repairs are completed that is also entered in. It's one of the amusements I learned when I was in school instructor had a shop and commented about the important aspect of keeping detailed records of repairs. Because oftentimes a customer who got a new crystal will come back later on when the watch doesn't work and expect you to fix the entire watch for free. Then you can remind them that they just got a crystal. Strangely enough that keeps coming up or occasionally comes up where I work now. One of the problems of using the service marks on the case is that in the case of pocket watches oftentimes that's not the original case. Then case marks? What I was doing warranty work for a company I used to describe a code number in the back of the case and it would tell me the next time I see the watch that basically what I did I made no attempt at keeping track of customers because we had literally thousands of them I think they sold 30,000 of these watches and they would come back by the hundreds because they had a lifetime warranty. Yes that's a story all of itself but I would put a code number that would reference what was done to the watch the last time and think I had a date in there somehow so it did tell a story if you knew the code. Another shop I once worked out the number would reference the page in the book. So other than knowing we had been in there you would have no idea what happened because you have to go look at the page in the book to see what happened. Then the problem of how you examine a watch you should examine the watch in detail every single time to avoid complications. Although on vintage watches and this is a of amusement I have at work when people ask something and I say of the watches done when it leaves. This is because on vintage oftentimes problems won't show up until the watches much farther into the repair like it's now running and you discover things that you can't discover before because it wasn't running to discover them that also become sometimes difficult to have exact rigid prices are estimates of repairs or in the case of a pocket watch you may not find out if a casing problem to later on when you case it up in the watches running. I was just thinking for all those people that would like to leave a mark maybe you should learn to do what some of the past watchmakers did? Leave a mark but leave it in such a way that no one will ever find it? Typically not done for repair purposes but done for other reasons like identifying it's legit. I have a friend with a Gruen watch and one of the Roman numbers the bottom line that just looks like a line under extreme magnification actually says Gruen watch company or something equivalent. So here's a link showing how to mark your watch without being seen although that's not the actual title. So if you can learn micro engraving you can engrave the watch someplace probably just about any place you just have to remember where you put it. https://cnaluxury.channelnewsasia.com/obsessions/how-to-prove-if-watches-are-authentic-secret-signatures-182516  
    • I have acquired a Citizen Leopard 36000 watch. My reason for purchasing it was my desire to own a timepiece with a 36,000 BPH movement, and the price was reasonable. Another motivating factor was gaining hands-on experience with the mechanism. The watch is in good condition, but I intend to fully disassemble it for maintenance. First and foremost, if anyone has prior experience with this particular model, I would greatly appreciate their insights. I do not have access to Citizen’s specialized lubricants and will need to use the ones available to me, such as 9010, 8000, and 8300 grease. Additionally, I do not possess the appropriate oil for the pallet jewels and will only be able to clean them.
    • Hello all, I am working on an older Valjoux Chrono. It doesn't have a stamp on the movement anywhere but I believe it is a Valjoux 72. I installed the train of wheels and they will not turn. The problem appears to be the 4th wheel and the escape wheel are not interfacing correctly. I had to replace both of these parts as the pivots were broken on each. I sourced genuine Valjoux/ETA replacements. I think the problem is with the escape wheel as all the wheels turn perfectly if I remove just the escape wheel.  My question to those with more Valjoux experience is am I mistaken? Is this some other model altogether and I have the wrong part or parts?    
    • I would remove the wheels, check for damage and if not damaged, clean. 
×
×
  • Create New...