Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The idea hit me...the microscope is stored in the closet in its pretty little wooden box--I do not work on Accutrons.  My Dad bought it.  I remember him asking my opinion--I was graduating engineering school.  It is pristine.

I have a stereo microscope with a very nice and huge boom stand...too big for the bench.  I use it for inspection often.

So...why not use this cute little thing on the bench.  It has limitations of course.

I am going to give it a try and see just how useful it can be.  I am sure @JohnR725has an opinion.  I am sure he has one.

20220111_185801.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, LittleWatchShop said:

I do not work on Accutrons. 

Why not? I'm sure you'll love them. 

I'm stuck on one Accutron 214 at the moment. It keeps good time in all positions, except "12 o'clock high" position.

Posted
Just now, HectorLooi said:

Why not?

Because I have not mastered the other stuff!!  I have a friend who asked me to fix his.  I want to (he is a friend), but I feel it may be a steep learning curve.  Also I have about six clocks in the queue, another Vulcain Cricket, and a drawer full of miscellaneous mechanicals.  I will never get bored.

Posted

Looks like you've got your hands full.

But Accutrons are really interesting. They are the only watches with true burnt coils, unlike quartz watches. Quartz coils normally break when someone slips with a screwdriver and scratch the surface. Accutrons have open coils with absolutely no visible physical damage.

If one can repair the burnt coils, Accutron owners will beat a path to his front door.

Posted
1 hour ago, HectorLooi said:

If one can repair the burnt coils,

Fuzzy memories they can't white focus on? Some worry saw the suggestion that the wire breaks at the solder connection. With the suggestion that may be the protective coating holding the wire is maybe? Don't love was thermal expansion and differences of something but basically the wire would break right at the joint. With the suggestion that you could just apply a little solder and fix the wire again. Zero idea how that plays out in real life. 

Typically as far as physical destruction it was only the 218 cell coils that got destroyed from bad battery changing. This is why supposedly in the US we ran out a cell coils before everywhere else in the world because all sorts of interesting people change batteries with zero experience. Basically all the places where you get a battery change the watch that they barely grasp what a watches. My favorite used to be what I'd go to whether drugstores in the old days we get a film processed and did look on the floor you'd see spring bars because in addition to taking your film and getting a process to change the battery in your watch how much skill could be required to do that obviously none.

Then I believe there's somebody out there that rewinds the coil's.

4 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

I am sure @JohnR725has an opinion.  I am sure he has one.

You suspected correctly that I have one it's sitting in the other room now with its protective cover on. Yes it should be in the box but not quite sure where the boxes right now. Considering the price it really isn't a bad microscope and it does exactly what it's supposed to do. I find typically I have a hard time using stereo microscopes as my left thigh is so much stronger than my right I just have a hard time. So it works out fine only have a one lens.

But I have seen you know someone who bought a Nikon stereo microscope well worth the money unfortunately it's a heck of a lot of money. At work they have a clone of probably the Nikon same pretty white color it's a microscope that's what they share in common but it just doesn't quite have I can't quite remember. I don't think it has the same working depth or he just doesn't quite have the quality but it cost a fraction of the cost and it does its job.

 

 

  • 3 months later...
Posted (edited)

Another thought on this microscope.   I have a nice stereo scope, so when I need close up work, it works quite nicely.  It is mounted on a large boom and takes up a lot of space, so it is a little cumbersome for lathe work.

This morning I had the idea to use the Bulova for turning.  I did a test and turned a 100um pivot using pivot steel.  It might work.  I wish I had a little more working distance, however.

2022-04-18 07_35_21-20220418_072159.jpg ‎- Photos.png

Edited by LittleWatchShop
100um not 10um
  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In writing "shimming the staff" I was alluding to the idea trailed in the above referenced thread of inserting a hair along the staff which, as the discussion there covered,  could result in some eccentricity. By making a (more or less) complete cylinder I was hoping to avoid that problem. Don't tell anyone, but needing a very ductile metal to do this by manipulation at such a small scale, I used a piece of an empty Tomato pureé tube! It occurred to me that the material's ductility(?) would also put less stress on the RT in forming a sufficiently tight seal. Anyway, that's how I avoided the temptation to use glue. No doubt your punctuational response to this confession will be "!!!" !
    • Hi All. I would appreciate some advice for a complete newbie on getting into watch servicing - nothing serious,  just as a fun project. I've got a thing for hand-wound watches and would like to bring an old watch (or two) back to life, so looking to learn to do a strip-clean-oil-assemble cycle.   I've toyed with this idea in the past (years ago) and picked up a couple candidates to learn on, but never found the time for them.  One is an old Ingersoll, swiss-made 17 jewels. It seems to wind and tick. Casing, dial, glass are in great shape, so looks like a good candidate to me for the first service. The other is a Benrus DR23. It winds and makes a few reluctant ticks, but then seems to stop. Casing looks like a complete gonner, and the dial is in pretty poor shape too. If the movement is not broken and just needs a service, I wonder if there's any possibility of getting a cheapo Chinese casing & dial to fit this movement in, or is it extremely unlikely to be the right size?   For a start, I want to strip & assemble a movement, perhaps a dozen times to build up the basic parts handling skills. I see that online advice is to buy a Chinese-made ST36 for this purpose. Can I just go at the Benrus or Ingersoll instead, or does it make more sense to get a cheap ST for this? Thank you.    
    • Hi,  I have this vintage Navitimer 806 with a bezel that plays a little bit as shown in this video: https://imgur.com/a/2NjdiF0 How would you fix this? I don't see where a gasket would fit for instance. Also, it seems this issue happens sometimes with older Navitimers.  Thanks
    • This is a screenshot of a video of it running. Not the best quality, though.
×
×
  • Create New...