Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi all. I need some input on an 1883 Waltham 18s I am working on. I found these washers under the roller seat after I removed the roller table. At first I thought I had a friction staff, but this staff was riveted (indeed, the 1883 model predates friction staffs). They are indeed washers, and came off the staff quite easily. I don't know if these are factory, or if someone replaced the roller with an incorrect one at some point, and needed to adjust the fit. Thoughts are appreciated. Picture attached. Many thanks.

IMG_20210420_192019_629.jpg

Posted

It is reasons like this as a guess as to why the Swiss don't want to sell American watchmakers parts. That's because we are so creative with problem solving.

We would need the dimensions of the staff but I suspect it's not a roller problem but a staff problem.

  • Like 1
Posted

OK it's supposedly a 1365 staff but I still have to take measurements. I have a 1365 coming so I'll be able to size them up. Thanks John.

Posted

I see some gouges in the staff from fitting the roller. Makes me think the roller was too small and they just added the washers in the gap.

Posted

I have a guess as to what's going on? I'm attaching the staff sizes below you'll notice that just below the staff your ordering is something that's almost identical except the hub size and it's a Tiny bit too long. So I suppose you could creatively make up for the hub size by using washers. The easy way to tell is just measure the hub and see what size yours is.

Waltham stafs.JPG

Posted (edited)

@JohnR725 awesome thanks, will check and get back.

Glad you posted this as it also confirms for me that this staff comes in 3 pivot sizes. That is a little stressful to me as all I know is I've got a 1365 staff coming. Both existing pivots are broken so measurement is not an option. Good odds I'm going to have to order all 3 and find the right size by process of elimination.

Edited by JohnC
Posted
1 hour ago, JohnC said:

Hi all. I need some input on an 1883 Waltham 18s I am working on. I found these washers under the roller seat after I removed the roller table. At first I thought I had a friction staff, but this staff was riveted (indeed, the 1883 model predates friction staffs). They are indeed washers, and came off the staff quite easily. I don't know if these are factory, or if someone replaced the roller with an incorrect one at some point, and needed to adjust the fit. Thoughts are appreciated. Picture attached. Many thanks.

IMG_20210420_192019_629.jpg

Out of the box thinking by someone who could not get a proper staff.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, JohnC said:

That is a little stressful to me as all I know is I've got a 1365 staff coming.

Is the problem with American balance staffs. People used to Swiss watches sometimes typically one staff. Unless there were variations because of the balance protection system perhaps. But with American staff specially Elgin there can be variations with the same part number as you've noted the pivots size almost always varies with almost all the staffs there's a few that are only one pivots size but almost all of them different pivots sizes. Then if it's a modern replacement staff like typically bestfit its typically over size so you can reduce it to fit.

This means the minimum you have to do is measure the old measure the new and verify their the same? Except it also need to verify that the original fits within the specifications of whatever staff you think is supposed to be there. Hopefully there were no other modifications made to your watch.

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)

@JohnR725I measure the height of the hub at 0.96mm, which is within a small margin of 1mm as quoted. The overall length with 2 broken pivots I measured at approx. 5.4mm. Adding 0.3 for each pivot brings us quite close to the 6mm quoted for the 1703. And yes, comparing my staff to pics of the 1703 on eBay, looks the same. I think you nailed it!

Will have to get the 1365 and test the lean in the jewels to figure out if it will work. Might take a while to get this baby running. Fortunately all jewels appear OK and the train is in good shape.

Edited by JohnC
Posted

[I can only assume I need a size 12 pivot because that's the only overlap between those two staffs - but we shall see.]

Posted (edited)

@JohnR725
looks like I need to open the roller hole, which appears to have been closed to fit the previous wrong staff. Pic attached. I think light broaching but want your opinion. Thanks.

IMG_20210424_081528119_HDR.jpg

Edited by JohnC
Posted

somewhere in my journey of learning watch repair I learned a rule. Never modify the watch to fit the replacement components. Always modify the component.

I think I might've said or I usually do point out that some staffs have been deliberately made oversize. This allows the watchmaker to reduce the size of the staff. Or I guess you can mutilate the roller table. So yes a very very light broach and maybe even a smoothing broach. Just because we don't know how much has been closed and you don't want to end up with it too big. Maybe a little from each side perhaps.

 

  • Thanks 1
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was wondering because of the alum idea. 
    • just a reminder about this test is it's not a perfect test it's a quick test. In other words you can adjust the banking pins that are both the same and visually this test will pass everything looks the same but both banking pins can be in the wrong place. although the majority of time when people are playing with banking pins I don't put them in the same place. one of things have to be careful of is I believe some of the pallet fork measuring tools that actually give you the roller jewel size are actually size so that I get confused? What I mean by this is if you inserted a whatever size in and are always told to go a slightly smaller I thought that the gauge itself its number corresponded to give you the exact number. So a lot of it depends upon the gauge itself I think you do want the roller jewel slightly smaller because it does have to fit in the slot and it does have a little bit a play. But if it's too small you will lose energy so does have to be sized right. Oh other things to check is? I'm attaching an Elgin sheet on checking the escapement I've seen references in the past to making sure that the slot in the four corn is nice and smooth and apparently you can end up with a rough slot and then the recommendation is to polisher clean that up. Not sure how well that's really going to work even if it has been the recommendation of other reference materials. yes art full plate watches fun when they don't work. This is where it's nice to have another set of eyes sometimes as maybe they'll find something you didn't  although that can add other issues. The owner of the shop provides himself on his skills of so now two of my watches have relocated to his bench to solve problems both real and imaginary I'm sure that will get fixed eventually hopefully. But still sometimes another set of eyes might see something that you're not. yes this sort of thing can be quite frustrating. Also makes for an interesting problem unless of course you're the one trying to solve the problem that it's a Escapement Elgin setting up the escapement.PDF
    • I’m not to sure mate! I’ve sent a picture! The crown is off a Tissot 1853 automatic limited edition T115427 A GP19 moto go watch!   
    • For years and I'm still using it I've been using something called SeaMonkey? It's a Mozilla product Basically outscore its Firefox plus an integrated email program. But not the same problems here a lot of times when things are upgraded they tend to be now aimed at very specific browsers like Firefox so I've had to switch to Firefox to respond to any of the messages on the group. So yes they do seem to be getting more browser specific and that may be a reason for others having complications especially if whatever you using hasn't been updated. So yes the world is getting more browser specific perhaps for security reasons. Even though I use a product that is updated on a regular basis is still has problems. So whatever you using for browser should be up to date and if is not recognized it's going to be a problem.
    • I did remember to ask at work and minor complication? Well I suppose technically two separate complications. First off glass mineral glass versus Seiko's Hardlex Glass. Don't know if other companies have their own class or not and a basic class for crystals is probably not the same as window glass it would be more transparent. It becomes obvious if you're looking at a sheet of flat crystal glass versus window glass it's definitely more transparent you can see it when you look at the edges of it window glass looks green. No idea how that changes physical characteristics other than optical. Then we also have thickness like the Seiko five's there crystals are really sick compared to other things and I'm guessing that makes things different. In the first link it talks about Sapphire versus mineral glass. One other thing is bothering me though when I'm reading this is where is the source material? What I mean by this is could we end up with multiple generations of salespeople quoting the same sales tactic or information and we don't actually know because you don't have a source reference? Let me quote something off the website it's brittle oh dear I was sad? Except it's not immune to damage it can crack where shatter under extreme force or impact. So what is the definition of extreme force or impact? Then is that more or less extreme then mineral glass?  Then regarding the price difference while back I had asked the owner where the Sapphire came from and basically wherever he can get the cheapest. So typically ordered from a variety of online supply watch parts in the US and  aliexpress China.. Then yes it does make a difference because we go through a lot of glass crystals and sapphire https://thehorologylab.com/sapphire-crystal-vs-mineral-glass-which-is-best-for-your-watch#google_vignette Then I guess one is glass not glass when it goes by another name? Hardlex Looks like it's purely a Seiko product but now I wonder if other watch companies have their own special glass? I didn't remember from past experience my favorite was people exposed to welding you can find little blobs a metal stuck to the watch case the crystal still intact but there's little burnt holes were bits of metal had actually burnt into the crystal but it was still there. Okay website below starts off with Sapphire sounds good but Apparently it can shatter easier then Hardlex. https://theslenderwrist.com/hardlex-crystal/ One other thing is what I'm reading to websites would be back to I want to see the test results? Often times weren't looking for a subject will find websites where I basically called them these are better than that by the way but sometimes I'll find websites that I will call book review websites were basically the review other websites other material and don't really introduce anything new to the subject. As I said these websites look quite nice which is why I'm giving you a link but where's the test results the definition of extreme how extreme to break a sapphire versus a glass or Hardlex?  
×
×
  • Create New...