Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I purchased this interesting caliber 1481 Omega watch style 166.0123

This morning i pulled out the winding stem to set the time and the stem just came out in my hand.  I pushed the stem back in, set the time, then pushed it in completely.  I figured the set screw was loose.

So i get to my shop, finish up the work im doing and then I wanted to open up this creature and tighten the setting lever  screw (if there is one).

The case is the weirdest ive come across so far (see pictures).  There are two flat strips of steel that one pushes out on either side and the movement comes out, crystal and all.  

The picture you see with the winding stem removed is from the seller.  When i pushed in the sem this morning i felt it click.  This afternoon i cannot pull it back out completely.  It looks to me that this watch should have a two part stem but it does not.

I have use about as much force as i feel comfortable pulling on the stem.  I am not about to remove the movement completely until the stem is out, of course.  

Any suggestions as to how this is disassembled?

Thanks, steve

Screenshot_20201213-152215_eBay.jpg

20201213_141332.jpg

IMG_20201208_193059_084.jpg

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Orologi67 said:

It looks to me that this watch should have a two part stem but it does not.

You maybe absolutely right about two part stem. Check CousinsUK parts list for this caliber and you will see options:

- Stem, Male Inner ( 1159 ), Omega 1480

- Tap 9 Female Stem Extension

- Tap 9 Female Stem Extension (No Shoulder)

https://www.cousinsuk.com/category/filter/omega-movement-parts

 

Edited by Poljot
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Ok i figured it out.  There is no setting lever screw.  It is kept in place with a bracket.  

I researched online and some of these 1480 series have dials that are pressed on and there are no dial mounting screws.

So i took a chance and removed the hands, gently pried off the dial which was very slightly friction fit, and voila!  The stem is removed from the front after one takes off the date ring.

20201214_112343.jpg

20201214_120511.jpg

Edited by Orologi67
Posted
1 hour ago, Orologi67 said:

Ok i figured it out.  There is no setting lever screw.  It is kept in place with a bracket.  

I researched online and some of these 1480 series have dials that are pressed on and there are no dial mounting screws.

So i took a chance and removed the hands, gently pried off the dial which was very slightly friction fit, and voila!  The stem is removed from the front after one takes off the date ring

My research indicated you're supposed to have a split stem with this number 081ST9992 That's the Omega number. Then a lot of Omega watches have dials the press on that doesn't mean you're supposed to remove your watch by disassembling them from the front side. Helpful though if you're having a problem but that's not the purpose.

Then I found someone else having a discussion about a watch like yours.

https://omegaforums.net/threads/split-stem-for-cal-1481.18126/

 

  • Like 1
Posted
42 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

"Then a lot of Omega watches have dials the press on that doesn't mean you're supposed to remove your watch by disassembling them from the front side. Helpful though if you're having a problem but that's not the purpose."

Just because it was not supposed to be disassembled in the sequence i used doesnt mean that one cant do it that way.  I accomplished 2 things by doing it the way i described.  I successfully removed the incorrect stem and i did not damage any parts in the process.

Yes it needs a split stem.  And yes i solved the problem.  Seems like youre giving me grief for not following protocol.  

20 years of clock repair has taught me to think outside of the box when disassembling. 

 

 

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If he was much younger and some sort of sports player it wouldn't be a problem. They would be in there and doing surgery and he'd be back on the field in no time. Unfortunately when you get older little things are bad and big things can be really bad so not good at all.
    • Where I work everything incoming watches whatever detailed descriptions are taken entered into a computer program and photograph of each item. Then ideally although it depends on who's doing the paperwork detailed descriptions can be quite good other times there lacking. Like I really like it with pocket watches if they would record the serial number it avoids confusion later on. Then when watch repairs are completed that is also entered in. It's one of the amusements I learned when I was in school instructor had a shop and commented about the important aspect of keeping detailed records of repairs. Because oftentimes a customer who got a new crystal will come back later on when the watch doesn't work and expect you to fix the entire watch for free. Then you can remind them that they just got a crystal. Strangely enough that keeps coming up or occasionally comes up where I work now. One of the problems of using the service marks on the case is that in the case of pocket watches oftentimes that's not the original case. Then case marks? What I was doing warranty work for a company I used to describe a code number in the back of the case and it would tell me the next time I see the watch that basically what I did I made no attempt at keeping track of customers because we had literally thousands of them I think they sold 30,000 of these watches and they would come back by the hundreds because they had a lifetime warranty. Yes that's a story all of itself but I would put a code number that would reference what was done to the watch the last time and think I had a date in there somehow so it did tell a story if you knew the code. Another shop I once worked out the number would reference the page in the book. So other than knowing we had been in there you would have no idea what happened because you have to go look at the page in the book to see what happened. Then the problem of how you examine a watch you should examine the watch in detail every single time to avoid complications. Although on vintage watches and this is a of amusement I have at work when people ask something and I say of the watches done when it leaves. This is because on vintage oftentimes problems won't show up until the watches much farther into the repair like it's now running and you discover things that you can't discover before because it wasn't running to discover them that also become sometimes difficult to have exact rigid prices are estimates of repairs or in the case of a pocket watch you may not find out if a casing problem to later on when you case it up in the watches running. I was just thinking for all those people that would like to leave a mark maybe you should learn to do what some of the past watchmakers did? Leave a mark but leave it in such a way that no one will ever find it? Typically not done for repair purposes but done for other reasons like identifying it's legit. I have a friend with a Gruen watch and one of the Roman numbers the bottom line that just looks like a line under extreme magnification actually says Gruen watch company or something equivalent. So here's a link showing how to mark your watch without being seen although that's not the actual title. So if you can learn micro engraving you can engrave the watch someplace probably just about any place you just have to remember where you put it. https://cnaluxury.channelnewsasia.com/obsessions/how-to-prove-if-watches-are-authentic-secret-signatures-182516  
    • I have acquired a Citizen Leopard 36000 watch. My reason for purchasing it was my desire to own a timepiece with a 36,000 BPH movement, and the price was reasonable. Another motivating factor was gaining hands-on experience with the mechanism. The watch is in good condition, but I intend to fully disassemble it for maintenance. First and foremost, if anyone has prior experience with this particular model, I would greatly appreciate their insights. I do not have access to Citizen’s specialized lubricants and will need to use the ones available to me, such as 9010, 8000, and 8300 grease. Additionally, I do not possess the appropriate oil for the pallet jewels and will only be able to clean them.
    • Hello all, I am working on an older Valjoux Chrono. It doesn't have a stamp on the movement anywhere but I believe it is a Valjoux 72. I installed the train of wheels and they will not turn. The problem appears to be the 4th wheel and the escape wheel are not interfacing correctly. I had to replace both of these parts as the pivots were broken on each. I sourced genuine Valjoux/ETA replacements. I think the problem is with the escape wheel as all the wheels turn perfectly if I remove just the escape wheel.  My question to those with more Valjoux experience is am I mistaken? Is this some other model altogether and I have the wrong part or parts?    
    • I would remove the wheels, check for damage and if not damaged, clean. 
×
×
  • Create New...