Jump to content

ETA Suit 7/21 Update


Recommended Posts

I read in Hodinkee this morning that ETA won the part of their antitrust suit to stop supplying movements outside the Swatch group. It said nothing about parts. I checked Cousins, and didn't see anything there either. Has anyone seen anything on the parts side of the ETA equation?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is a different ligation and has nothing to do with parts. Unlike the Cousins one that has been (partly) narrated in details by the British material hose, this one as been conducted in the normal Swiss style, that is nobody except those with a direct interest knows anything about it.
BTW I think is Hodinkee is not more useful than to get swank styling suggestions. To learn more about the Swiss swatch industry sometime Europastar had insight articles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK. Wasn't sure. I don't especially care about who they sell movements to in terms of smaller companies making new watches. We need more Sellitas and the like.

8 hours ago, jdm said:

I think is Hodinkee is not more useful than to get swank styling suggestions.

Super agree. Came up in a news feed or I wouldn't have seen it (methinks Google has caught onto my interest in watches). The watch universe is divided into two camps: fashion/bling and mechanical object. The Venn diagram has a small (and probably a little blurry) intersection. The reason I spend my time here rather than other forums is because the focus is almost exclusively in the one camp with almost none of the pretenses of the other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I visited this place last year just before they closed their counter service - amazing shop (filled from floor to ceiling!) and the guy that was working there was really knowledgeable and helpful!. Their website isn't as good as Cousins but I understand that if you fill out the contact form they have stuff that isn't on the site. https://gleave.london/mineral-flat-bottom-domed/
    • As always in this game the answer is “it depends “ because the first one worked out ok doesn’t mean all will. A case could be made in a way that it would not really matter much, sounds like your first example. However a case could also be made so that only a tension armoured crystal could be used. Generally you replace like for like to maintain the integrity of the watch.   Tom
    • When can you use a standard crystal to replace one that had a tension ring? The first time I popped a crystal with a tension ring out of a watch I found that I had a suitable sized standard crystal and decided to try that.  It fit nicely and it was hard to see that anything was missing from the watch.  I understand that it probably reduced the water resistance of the watch but since it was an old dress watch it wasn't going for a swim anyway! I have since tried the same thing on another watch and found that the tension ring seemed to have an additional role of holding the dial in place.  With the standard crystal in there the dial and movement falls forward. This means it rattles in the case and falls forward and the hands fowl on the crystal (when the dial is down). Is there a trick I am missing here or does this watch require a special crystal?  I am reluctant to buy an expensive armoured crystal only to find I have the same problem.  
    • So I wrapped the anvil it in bubble wrap and passed ot through the demag only. Still no go—the unit is simply too strong.  next experiment is to use a VARIAC to lower the voltage and see if that reduces the magnetic field. 
    • In this case, the underside of the crystal is flat so I assume I don't have to worry about clearance to the hands. However, perhaps I'm missing something. If so, please let me know. I guess no one has the patience to get into the details of my first post so here's a simplified version of my question: The case diameter for the glass gasket is 36.9mm. However, Cousins doesn't have a glass gasket with that diameter. The closest are 36.8mm and 37.0mm. Would any of those two options work, and if so which one? I have no problem ordering both and testing them, but If someone already knows it is pointless, there's no reason to order. No, I haven't. Is there someone you can recommend? Preferably in Europe. Thanks!
×
×
  • Create New...