Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I bought a load of old Accurist ETA movements on eBay for practice (all reported not working in listing) 4 of them are ETA 2390 with small variations (different balance settings).

These arrived yesterday morning. A couple of them run at least for a few minutes, but I decided to tackle the 'worst' one first, I figured it would be easier to see if I had made a difference. (It wouldn't 'start' at all despite being fully wound).

It had a fair bit of corrosion and was pretty dirty. Photos show a summary of strip down and cleaning. I manually cleaned in a small jar with horosolve, removing corrosion as best I could with pegwood and fibreglass pen, the end result is far from perfect but a massive improvement on how it started, and joy of joys, on reinstallation of the balance it started running! I got quite emotional!

I did a reasonably thorough job, relubricating as I went through reassembly, only 'shortcuts' were that I removed the barrel lid and checked spring for damage, but didn't remove it, and I didn't tackle disassembly of the balance as it seemed too much too soon (really should since this doesn't have a shock setting so balance disassembly is required to clean and lubricate top setting) I gave it a brief go, but after failing to get at the tiny screw on the stud after several attempts, I had fears of ever being able to get it back together if I did manage to get it apart.

Anyway, on timegrapher the initial readings on a full wind were amplitude of around 240 and beat error of 1.5ms, rate anywhere between -3 and +20 depending on position, so not brilliant, but I'm happy enough given it is a scrap movement that didn't run at all yesterday. I cannibalised one of the other 2390s from the lot for its hands (this one was missing a minute hand) and reinstalled the dial so I could pop it on my desk under a glass to let it run for a couple of days and check its rundown and timekeeping over a longer period. With the experience gained on this one, hopefully I can get the 'nicer' ones from the lot working a bit better!

IMG_20200530_113102~2.jpg

IMG_20200530_112630~2.jpg

IMG_20200530_142556.jpg

IMG_20200530_155207.jpg

IMG_20200530_172046.jpg

IMG_20200530_172851.jpg

IMG_20200530_184822.jpg

IMG_20200531_155311.jpg

IMG_20200531_164501.jpg

IMG_20200531_180118_443.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

Very good, congratulations.

After getting a watch running, in all positions for a time near to the expected power reserve, the next step is to use a timegrapher or equivalent application to see how it runs.

And if you want to look it better try an ammonia based solution. You won't need any cleaning machine or ultrasonic.

Edited by jdm
Posted
45 minutes ago, jdm said:

Very good, congratulations.

After getting a watch running, in all positions for a time near to the expected power reserve, the next step is to use a timegrapher or equivalent application to see how it runs.

And if you want to look it better try an ammonia based solution. You won't need any cleaning machine or ultrasonic.

Thanks, I'm really new to this, but so far finding it a lot of fun and therapeutic. Does the ammonia based solution remove the corrosion somewhat? Would you do that as well as (after?) cleaning in horosolve or naphtha? Or instead of?

I will see how the power reserve is and report back, only finished rebuilding around 6 hours ago so will run it in a few positions this week. Beyond that, not sure how much more effort I will spend on this one for now regarding timing and such. It seems 'out of balance'? and for the moment, adjusting that on this fixed stud balance is beyond my confidence to tackle. I may come back to it one day as it would be a good candidate to practice tackling that specific issue on when I feel up to it!

The other 3 2390s in the lot all have nicer finishing to the movement (a sort of rose gold colour) and have shock settings on the balance, and movable studs, so if I do try and build up a watch with the case that was in the lot too, I'll probably use one of those rather than this one.

The case is weird, also accurist, just base metal plated and with very strange lugs, the like of which I've not seen before, and the case construction is 3 parts, so the dial actually sits between the crystal and midcase on a lip, so you would need to install the movement from the dial side into it. I did briefly try putting this movement in there but the stem hole in the case was slightly too small to allow the stem to pass into the case fully so abandoned it for now.

Posted
13 hours ago, Pauly said:

Thanks, I'm really new to this, but so far finding it a lot of fun and therapeutic. Does the ammonia based solution remove the corrosion somewhat? Would you do that as well as (after?) cleaning in horosolve or naphtha? Or instead of?

Use ammonia and rins with naptha or even better petroleum ether. Ammonia cleans up tarnish on brass and gold. Corrosion once has eaten material can only be repaired with lapping, There are easy techniques producing high-end effects, these are good to learn to develop a feel for materials and handling.

13 hours ago, Pauly said:

 Beyond that, not sure how much more effort I will spend on this one for now regarding timing and such

It's not about timing, it's about "how correctly it runs". On a petrol engine you could tell by sound if a cylinder is not firing, but on watch it's not to easy judge by look and sounds alone. You want a regular pattern, sufficient amplitude, and and acceptable positional error. Only after that is all good then you move to correcting beat error and timing. The timegrapher is an unreplace itool once you work and even just service mechanical movements.

Posted

I let it run in a few positions, power reserve is around 36 hours in all of them, which is a little low vs the documented specs for a 2390. I will strip it and rebuild it again, having stripped and rebuilt another 2 of these 2390s now this week, (both of which run longer) I think the train on this one wasn't quite as free as the other 2 so I will recheck all the wheels for damage and end shake.

I have a weird behaviour on the timegrapher on one of those other 2 I've rebuilt. I'll see if I can track it down, otherwise I'll be back looking for advice!

Posted

@Pauly It's great breathing life back into something that look and feels dead, so well done on getting her running again!

You might find changing the mainspring will reap rewards with the amplitude, but also, for the sake of a tenner, you'll save a lot of bother trying to track down faults which was the mainspring all along! 240 amplitude is not such a good start point, as faults might start showing themselves, when it was the mainspring all the time.

Nice to see you got her going again!

Posted

Thanks, it has been really satisfying, I had 4 of these arrive in a joblot from eBay last Saturday, and I've now rebuilt 3 of them, it has been kind of an addiction! the 4th one has given up its balance and a shock setting spring to the cause of the other 3 so it's not going to make it sadly, all the other 3 now run to some degree or another though (See my other thread on timing weirdness on one of them!). I do have the going barrel from the 4th one that I could swap in as a test to see if it makes much difference but I think it is likely I just over oiled this (only 2nd watch I had tried a rebuild on outside of the practical bit of Mark's course) or missed something during rebuild, and it was really filthy  and corroded when I started on it. Like I said, with the experience of the other 2 behind me now, I think this one was a bit stiffer to turn the train... The other 2 would literally spin the train under the puff of a dust blower... The barrel is an easy swap so I will try that first. It's really not worth buying a mainspring for it. This, 5 other movements and a case only cost me £12 all in for something to practice on. I will do my best on the 3 I have and build the best running one into the case when I'm done, I've done a trial build in the case now and it looks pretty neat!

  • Like 1
Posted

Seems to me you are doing very good with your pragmatic approach. Thanks for sharing and best of luck!



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So it's what people call a Citizen C Mark and was the first centre second movement they produced in 1950. This lines up with the serial number which dates yours to March 1951.
    • Hello I'm trying to install the Hour Counting Wheel assembly in a Valjoux 7750. The issue I'm having is the Hour Hammer Wheel keeps fouling on the Hour Hammer and the Hour Hammer Counter Lock. I believe it's because the Hour Hammer Counter Wheel is pinned to the Calendar Bridge. The latter prevents me from installing the Hour Hammer Counter Wheel separate of the bridge and seeing how it interacts with the other Hour Hammer components. These are my questions: 1.) Should I take the pin off? The one holding the Hour Hammer Wheel to the  Calendar Bridge? 2.) Can this pin be removed? 3.) Any tips for installing the whole assembly if I'm not meant to remove the pin? I've included pictures to better illustrate what I'm writing about. Thanks in advance for any help that can be provided. 
    • The crystal seems to be exactly the same as the old one, bought from Cousins using the model number of the watch. I tried again to manipulate it into the case but still having no luck. I think I will have to reduce the size slightly but am worried that once it's in, it could be loose. Before I do that I think I will try and design a custom shaped die for my crystal press and 3D print it. 
    • What you’re saying is that if the entire coil is lifted or tilted either up or down it is due to a slight twist in the spring? Usually next to the stud?  I’ve chased this before and in one instance the spring came out of the stud and I had to reinstall it and secure it in place.  Do you find that the angle (not twist) the spring leaves the stud not only affects how it centers in the regulator pins but also the coil spacing? This could be caused by a distortion in the spring as it grabs and release the pins. I find turning the stud counter clockwise opens the coils 180 degrees away from it. So do I adjust the stud in relation to the regulator pins or to the coil spacing?  I also find that unless I remove the balance from the cock I can’t see the slight distortions in the spring. In my picture the distorted spring looked fine when installed. Do you use Alex’s technique of sliding the regulator arm up and down the curve to find distortions or can you visually see them?    Gettin back to positional variation for a moment. The angle of the regulator block is set by the factory and I’ve noticed it’s always the same. I have seen that sometimes the pins are too closed and grab or can grab the spring. If you open the pins to do the curve check what guide do you use to close them back down to the correct angle? 
    • So if anybody overrides what i say, listen to them haha. I'm not an expert but i've just been in this boat a dozen times as i used to mess up hairsprings bad, but the good part of that was that i got to learn how to fix them.  What made my life SO much easier was learning how to adjust the hairsprings with the balance installed on a disassembled mainplate, unless it's a very serious problem or on an inner coil you can't get to i would recommend trying this in part because the spring will mostly ALWAYS look flat when the balance wheel is not installed on the cock. Install the balance wheel back in the cock and the cock with the cap jewels in the mainplate, with it installed even the most imperceptible twist will be pretty obvious. Just make sure the balance jewels are also installed. In these movements, if 99% of the time any twist or problems gonna be around the terminal curve, twists often near the stud, especially if you've been removing their awfully designed studs from the balance cock. If there's a reliable way to install those things without introducing a minor twist to them i haven't found it. they're an awful design. INstall the balance on you mainplate WITH your capstones/chatones and look sideways across the balance under magnification. Look for the highest or lowest spot of the now not flat hairspring. 180 degrees from that high or low spot is where your twist will be. You have to be VERY careful with twists as the tiniest over or under twist brings it out of flat. If the area i have to untwist is near the stud i just use a pair of #5 tweezers or some very sharp fine curved tweezers and gently see which way i twist it corrects the twist, then i hold the very fine point of the tweezers on the hairspring and just gently squeeze and check it and see if it started to correct it, then i rinse and repeat. Tiny adjustments is what you want, don't close them all the way, and dont' introduce a flat spot in them. it's just a little nudge by closing the tweezers on it at an angle. .  If the twist is not near the stud, i grasp the hairspring with some very fine curved tweezers as gently as possible while still holding it then i do that same sorta tweezer squeeze with my #5's. 
×
×
  • Create New...