Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

See article below which raises concerns about the data collection from Smart watches & Fitness trackers. (not a problem with my Rolex:))

 

Makers of smart watches and fitness trackers are not doing enough to protect their users’ privacy, it has been claimed.

A report from the Human Data Commons Foundation found brands could be overstepping the mark in the way that data is collected and shared.

The ‘Quantified Self Report Card’ reviewed the terms and privacy policies of 18 leading manufacturers of smart watches and fitness trackers.

It graded companies on legal rights, data collection and sharing, data access, and security.

The Report Card highlights the “surprising” ways companies use data collected about people using fitness trackers and smart watches.

It found many companies create marketing profiles of users by combining fitness data with information from social media and other sources.

Some partnered with insurance companies to share fitness data. And it found companies will share information with police in criminal investigations.

Greg McMullen, co-author of the report, said: “There are many review sites comparing features and what it’s like to use the fitness trackers and smart watches these companies make. We think it’s just as important to look at how the companies use your data.”

The Report Card ranked Apple in first place. “Apple is trying to make privacy a competitive advantage, and that’s good for their users,” said McMullen.

Suunto and TomTom tied for second in the Report Card, followed by Xiaomi, Huawei, and Withings.

Fitbit and Google’s Wear OS platform placed in the middle of the pack, while Samsung and Moov finished at the bottom of the class.

Both companies have “aggressive” data collection and sharing practices, and terms that limit users’ rights, the study claims.

The 2019 Report Card is the third annual report from the Human Data Commons Foundation, a Vancouver-based not-for-profit organisation.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Believe the relume (not a fan) was done a long time after the damage. 
    • I can only think of some chemical reaction to reluming
    • I have a little milling attachment for my WW lathe, but very rarely use it and not for wheel and pinion cutting. For that I use a small Sixis 101 milling machine. I normally do direct dividing, but sometimes have to do an odd count and use the universal index which also fits on the Sixis.   Back in the day when I didn't have a mill, I would cut gearing on my Schaublin 102. It has a universal dividing attachment which fits the back of the spindle. Both it and the one for the Sixis are 60:1 ratio, and with the set of 4  index plates I can do almost any division. When I've had to do a strange high count prime number, I print a disc with the needed division and just place the plunger on the dot. Any position error is reduced by a factor of 60 so still plenty accurate.   The machines are a mess in the pics as I'm in the process of making a batch of barrels for a wristwatch 🙃.   This is the Sixis. The head can also be placed vertically, as can the dividing spindle.   Dividing plates. The smaller ones fit another dividing spindle.   Universal divider for the Sixis. I put it together with parts from an odd Sixis spindle that takes w20 collets, like the Schaublin 102, and a dividing attachment from a Schaublin mill.     The dividing attachment for the 102. The gear fits in place of the handwheel at the back of the headstock.   And the little milling attachment for the WW lathe. I just set it on the slide rest to illustrate the size, you can see from the dust on it it really doesn't get used much. I think only when I change bearing in the head, to kiss the collet head seat (grinding wheel still in the milling attachment).
    • I read a lot about the quality (or lack thereof) of Seiko's 4R, 6R, 8L  movements...or more specifically the lack of regulation from the factory. Especially when compared to similar priced manufactures using SW200's or ETA's. I thought I'd ask those more in the know, do the 4R's and 6R's deserve their bad reputation, is it fairly easy for someone with minimal skills (or better yet a trained watch mechanic) to dial in these movements to a more acceptable performance.    For background I spent more on a 1861 Speedy years ago, expecting that the advertised 0-15s/d  would probably perform more like 5-7s/d. In reality it's been closed to 2-4s/d. 
×
×
  • Create New...