Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm really excited about this project.  I bought this watch because it looked interesting, not sure if it was repairable.  Thankfully the movement was in good shape, despite missing a couple parts.  I removed the last of the "gold" plating, polished the case, polished the crystal.  I figured out how to Nickel plate the case (which turned out okay) from some sources online.  Super happy with how it turned out!

Before:

2139964860_Dorsa-Before-Front.thumb.jpg.36a48ab89819979ba2276ebbde6936e0.jpg

708679675_Dorsa-Before-Back.thumb.jpg.f447166f30abb15c07e37968c1e8ac6a.jpg

 

After:

IMG_1683.thumb.JPG.9cdd7e67e0e58b7d10c80d909bf2a2ca.JPG

  • Like 5
Posted (edited)

Thanks JBerry!

The plating was actually much rougher looking before, this is after sanding and polishing again.

For the setup, I roughly followed this guide: https://www.instructables.com/id/High-Quality-and-safe-Nickel-Plating/

My only addition was to put the entire setup into an ultrasonic cleaner with the hopes that it would make the finish more uniform.  If I had to do it again I would probably use a lower current (I used .25A, might do 0.1A next time) as I've heard it gives a better finish.  I was a bit impatient and so I cranked up the current.  For the power supply I'm using an HP regulated PS and setting it to current limit.

For cleaning I used G50 watch cleaner, which worked great. 

For the nickel source I used Nickels, since where I'm from the old ones are nearly 100% pure.

 

Edited by Dpastl
Added info
Posted (edited)

If you're interested I can add pictures.

Edit: I'll add more info when I get home, it might be useful for other people wanting to get into plating old watches.

Edited by Dpastl
Posted

The basic setup:

IMG_1685.thumb.JPG.65b56286e16c09db1f33f38791edc7a3.JPG

Missing of course is the power supply, electrode, and thing to plate.  The small jar of plating solution (Nickel acetate) is sitting in a water bath inside the ultrasonic cleaner.  The water bath serves to conduct the sound waves into the plating solution.  I've no idea if this makes things better, it's just what I did.  It does keep bubbles from sticking to the surface of the object however.

The result for me was a nice satin finish, similar to the crown on the watch

IMG_1686.thumb.JPG.d65f404288025b568e0055bb06496530.JPG

For the case I polished and sanded this away to make it smooth and shiny.  You can see a bunch of imperfections but that seems to be due to it being insufficiently polished and my worrying about breaking through the finish.

So, some lessons learned from plating:

  1. It takes longer than you think.  First attempt I stopped way too soon and it just looked like a weird thin gold plate instead, with all the brass showing through
  2. Get the object perfect before.  It's not really possible to polish things smooth after plating and they're much more visible.  Like most things prep is everything

That's it for plating.  If anyone has pictures from their attempts or suggestions for how to improve the process I'd love to hear them!

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I also still use my cheap first set of screwdrivers. I replaced the blades of the smallest (0.6mm) with higher quality once I had bent a few of the originals, but beyond that I have been fine. Note though that I do not work on any remotely valuable watches and most of what I deal with are in a truly terrible state, watches that have been banging around in kitchen drawers or toolboxes. So my concern for screw head slot integrity and scratches is usually not very high.  As for a loupe - you won't need anything powerful for an ST36 that is new. You don't need to do close inspection of balance pivots because they will not be worn out, and a 3x or 5x loupe is perfectly sufficient to see the oiling. I don't have any microscope or powerful magnification of any sort. I just use cheap loupes. But again this would be different if I were working with more valuable watches. And if I had equipment to burnish pivots, then I would get a microscope to check my work.
    • I've recently switched over to using a x2.5 -x3 eyeglass for disassembly and some larger part assembly. It's interesting to see how accustomed and trained your eyes become to that way of working after using a microscope for years. And pick up and work at eyelevel when possible. Personally I would stick with and learn to use regular oilers efficiently. 
    • I remember playing with asbestos wire insultaion when I was a kid (remember the cool fluffy white stuff?) and I've been breathing fine dust particles in my woodworking shop for years, so I'm probably toast either way, but I don't want any of this radioactive dust anywhere near my kids.
    • Its good to understand how and why demagnetisers work. These two pieces of text explain in basic terms how ferrous metal is affected by magnetism and why they can retain some of those properties.  The cheap demagnetiser is actually a magnetiser,but is used in a way that can remove the weak magnetic properties that a steel has gained through magnetic field exposure.  As steel is drawn further away from the device, the magnetic fields around it become progressively weaker and more -irregular- . This causes the disruption of the atomic and subatomic alignments within the steel that make it magnetised. So also moving the steel  through different orientations as its pulled away could actually improve that process. I still use my first cheap set of drivers, I notice very little difference in the way of feel between them and a set of preowned Bergeon I use, blade quality is more important. Tweezers have more variables, but again they don't have to be expensive to work well. My most used tweezers are my cheapest, but then I never use any pair that I haven't modified in some way. 
×
×
  • Create New...