Jump to content

Home brewed mic for Iphone Timegrapher app?


bsoderling

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I’m a fan of the timegrapher app for Iphone and have been using it for a long time, with reasonable result for my needs.

 

My assumption is that the weak spot is the mic where you are using the built-in mic in the head set that comes with the phone.

 

My question is if there’s any experience out there from building/adapting an alternative mic to plug into the head set input on the phone.

 

I have seen many posts where people have designed pc s/w and built mic’s that plug into your pc and I would guess one could do the same with the Iphone.

 

Any feedback is appreciated.

 

 

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s funny your should post this now. I have just uploaded my latest video on my channel and it’s about the iPhone app vs iOS app.

App came off interestingly should we say.

Due to some of the feedback and my own curiosity I am going to do one short video test using my lapel mic that I would use for my voice. Also to remove the caseback.

I will test first on the timegrapher and then on the app and then compare.
Here is my video





Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well...strange things happen all the time.

Truly inspiring and I must agree with your fundamental conclusion, if you want something that works simply and flawlessly out of the box, the Weishi is definitely not over priced.

But still...there’s something about exploring the underlying reasons and possibly try to improve what you have. Kind of the same sentiment that makes watch work interesting...

Some quick feedback from my experiences that might be interesting for others.

- I find it consistently easier to get good readings with an open case and the mic directly over the escapement. Again I guess that has to do with limitations of the mic (and possibly the signal conditioning that follows).

- I usually step back on the sensitivity to the point where I get no readings (or zero sensitivity) and then step up to where I get the most stable plot and reading. Sometimes this is significantly lower than the default 12 setting.

- I tend to always use the noise cancellation option in the settings menu. Especially when it’s hard to get an amplitude reading this allows to increase the sensitivity without getting rubbish data.

- It’s difficult to get completely clear lines, there will always be some outliers. To me this indicate that the s/w that detects the relevant points in the signal isn’t smart enough to sort these out as erroneous. Alternatively it’s the signal conditioning/filtering that could be better.

- Fundamentally I wouldn’t trust the average readings produced when the plot looks like as with your 2nd watch. Garbage in => garbage out and averaging shouldn’t make it more reliable (unless there is actually more going on that we don’t see that removes outlier data)

To conclude, it would be great with a follow up where you try to tweak the performance a bit. But I realize I’m probably a bit too nerdy here... :-)

And I still wouldn’t be surprised if a better mic and some analogue filtering could do magic with the performance of the app.

I know there are posts on that subject on the forum and I’ll see what I can dig out there.

And you got yourself a new follower on youtube... :-)










Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suppose the main issue is the app, not so much the mic.

I posted about unsatisfacting results with different Iphone apps here in the forum (maybe post was deleted by a kind moderator). I used special piezo mics as well  as direct signal input with different volumes-

Frank

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well...strange things happen all the time.

Truly inspiring and I must agree with your fundamental conclusion, if you want something that works simply and flawlessly out of the box, the Weishi is definitely not over priced.

But still...there’s something about exploring the underlying reasons and possibly try to improve what you have. Kind of the same sentiment that makes watch work interesting...

Some quick feedback from my experiences that might be interesting for others.

- I find it consistently easier to get good readings with an open case and the mic directly over the escapement. Again I guess that has to do with limitations of the mic (and possibly the signal conditioning that follows).

- I usually step back on the sensitivity to the point where I get no readings (or zero sensitivity) and then step up to where I get the most stable plot and reading. Sometimes this is significantly lower than the default 12 setting.

- I tend to always use the noise cancellation option in the settings menu. Especially when it’s hard to get an amplitude reading this allows to increase the sensitivity without getting rubbish data.

- It’s difficult to get completely clear lines, there will always be some outliers. To me this indicate that the s/w that detects the relevant points in the signal isn’t smart enough to sort these out as erroneous. Alternatively it’s the signal conditioning/filtering that could be better.

- Fundamentally I wouldn’t trust the average readings produced when the plot looks like as with your 2nd watch. Garbage in => garbage out and averaging shouldn’t make it more reliable (unless there is actually more going on that we don’t see that removes outlier data)

To conclude, it would be great with a follow up where you try to tweak the performance a bit. But I realize I’m probably a bit too nerdy here... :-)

And I still wouldn’t be surprised if a better mic and some analogue filtering could do magic with the performance of the app.

I know there are posts on that subject on the forum and I’ll see what I can dig out there.

And you got yourself a new follower on youtube... :-)










Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk



Thanks , detailed reply!
All makes sense.
Don’t worry there will be a short follow on to the first video . Probably within a few days. I will try to see how I can better the reading after getting a datum reading off the TG .



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

Saw your new video and it’s pretty much in line with my experience. On some watches it works better on some not so good.

Interesting alternative mic trial. The mic does have an influence but it will be a tough task to find one that really makes a change in the positive direction without lots of trial and (mostly) error.

Looking forward to coming videos!




Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You need to know at least the basics. Then the questions that You ask will begin to make sense. From what is seen on the video, the gear train and escapement look fine, but the balance doesn't rotate free. I can suppose that the thin gold colored shim that must stay under the balance cock is not in place.
    • Yes, there are a lot of shapes and all of them are used in different cases. The one in Waltham A11 is one of the most spreaded and is what I have shown in the beginning. Of course, the radius of the final curve will depend on the distance between the hole in the stone and the regulator pins on the cock
    • I just found these. They don't really grab my eye at the moment, but having seen the change in some of the watches on here, before & after, the results have been pretty impressive. https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/196382906131?itmmeta=01HXBSJJXDB5J6H916ARJP9PHE&hash=item2db9555713:g:REwAAOSwUNdmOYAZ&itmprp=enc%3AAQAJAAAAwOAlUO3a1pAUX60Y8gUeXMPriraj5e7rkBNH2EA6cIUH7kb7hzoq6jRmOsYOQazk9R%2FteDESr1e50Asabv2tbJyDM%2FVODtmrAScFS4jPhHdgu6Jvt%2BFuRGBijpTkPl4NiK%2FDGr6qztc1Ujb33Tt6YdaUztOH9R1y9XJbwjH0puPDy8m0ilYcal7Vphcp7d59DLtBliNnbqfxfWhxdia2xMRyHYFHzR0Rg7NqB1z4xQGMZb73MAG4QBiF9FMkrII88Q%3D%3D|tkp%3ABk9SR_KuyvnqYw
    • I agree, it's getting harder and harder to find anything that meets the brief other than complete junk, or fake/frankenwatches. I would be in favor of raising the limit so people can continue to enjoy the challenge of resurrecting these low cost watches to their former glory and allowing the watchmaker the ability of practicing new skills without the worry of breaking the bank if all doesn't go to plan. Now all we need to do is settle on a value - maybe base the value on a standard currency so we are all playing by the same rules ($, £, €...?) Unless anyone minds I could start a poll and we could all vote on currency and value... let me know!
    • Same for me, but this is the first time I use the Bestfit. I understand that, for a 17-3/4 caliber, I have to consult page 150, but I can't find any resemblance. Thank you for all your research. I learn a little more each time I use this forum 😀
×
×
  • Create New...