Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm looking at having a go of the dark art of black polishing, in particular I want to learn it for restoring old pocket watches for parts that have suffered minor surface damage.

I'm going to cast and then machine my own polishing plate.

All the books talk about using Zinc for steel parts and I have read tin for gold parts, but online have read about a few people using a tin plate for steel parts.

Tin will be easier to cast than zinc, but I should still be able to manage to cast zinc, but just want to know if anyone here has tried black polishing and if so have they used a tin plate, or should I go the extra effort and cast a zinc plate?

Posted

I have both and prefer tin. Some folks add a little silver to the tin (I've heard between 1-5%) for a little more hardness; I have a couple and also pure tin and can't tell a huge difference.

Just avoid lead or tin/lead alloy. The lead is toxic and its oxide is just abrasive enough to make polishing next to impossible.

What's more important than composition is that the block be flat and not too smooth (rough lathe finish or scratch it up with a file), and not too much polishing paste. It needs to get almost dry to hit the black polish.

  • Like 1
Posted

Thanks, I plan on buying pure tin from a foundry in Queensland that sells it in small amounts to hobbyists for reasonable prices so don't need to worry about the purity.

With Zinc I would of had to gone done the path of green sand casting, but with tin I should be able to just get away making the mould with just getting some hardwood and using a hole saw drill a hole through the wood and clamp it onto  another bit of wood.

Yes the wood will likely smoulder a bit, but that doesn't matter for a one off use mould.

What diameter are your plates?

Posted

I have a few around 100mm or so. Much bigger it's just more of a pain to redress them.

 

A friend who used to make them just melted the tin on a hotplate and poured into silicon molds. Another used shoe polish tins or tuna cans.

Posted

Thanks, I was thinking around 100mm, but its always good to get confirmation.

A silicon mould would concern me to use as its max temp is only 30C above the max use temp of tin, but I guess if you are careful it could be ok.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I ordered last Friday 3 kilograms of high purity (>99%) tin from a foundary, its currently in the post and should arrive late this week. (Cost a fortune)

Its my son's birthday this weekend so I doubt I will get a chance to cast the plates this weekend, but when I do I'll be sure to take photos of my whole process.

  • Like 1
Posted
I ordered last Friday 3 kilograms of high purity (>99%) tin from a foundary, its currently in the post and should arrive late this week. (Cost a fortune)
Its my son's birthday this weekend so I doubt I will get a chance to cast the plates this weekend, but when I do I'll be sure to take photos of my whole process.
3kg [emoji23] you'll have everything in a 1/2 mile radius polished. Joking of course, that's really cool. Do you have a tripod/bolt tool?
Posted
17 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

3kg emoji23.png you'll have everything in a 1/2 mile radius polished. Joking of course, that's really cool. Do you have a tripod/bolt tool?

I bought enough to make at least 3 polishing disks, so I can use different ones for different diamond pastes.

I have in the post a tripod tool for polishing flat parts, but not screw heads, if I cant find one soon for a reasonable price It will likely become a project for me to make one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I must be going nuts !! I checked the parts list to get a part number and see that there is no screw shown. Only a rotor assembly. I checked the rotor I removed and the screw is part of the assembly. What a stupid error Regards to all, Dave
    • This would have been seen before the fork and balance were even fitted if you carried out a test on the train wheel as a matter of course.  
    • With the amphibia there's also the gasket in the screw-in crown. If memory serves a correct seal for the back of the case is tricky to find as well, but maybe that's because mine are vintage. The newer cases are larger I think. 
    • As others have pointed out we discussed this subject in great lengths multiple times on multiple discussion groups. Then we have a subject that has too many variables and generalizations that make all the different things seem like one common removing staffs when it's not. There are variety of balance wheels specifically designed to be hard enough to withstand knocking or pushing a staff out. Rolex has one that the only way the staff is coming out is by pushing it out enough pressure is applied the river breaks with a very satisfying pop. This is because they hairspring cannot be removed until the staff is pushed out through. Then of course Rolex has a nice set of tools just for this purpose. A variety watch companies like Elgin made a balance wheels specifically designed to be hard enough to withstand knocking the staff have. For instance that principle is applied with jeweling tool you mention and here's the complete article down below that explains the procedure. Then of course there are variety watch companies Elgin And Hamilton that specifically designed balance staffs designed to be knocked out because the riveting shoulder is supposed to break. That of course would be the original staffs and probably the aftermarket do not have such features.   One of the problems with all of these tools would be the balance staff itself and of course whatever the balance wheel is made of. Personally I like the rule of if you're knocking the staff out and you gently tap with the hammer and it doesn't just pop out then you do not drive it out you do have to use a lathe. Because for variety of reasons staffs that are perhaps over riveted not quite the right size soft balance arms etc. driving a staff out that doesn't really want to come out it's not your best interest to do that.   A variety of American companies used friction fit staffs. For instance here's an example of Waltham Here's something interesting from Hamilton a specific type of 992 with a specific type of hairspring. Normally the Hamilton friction staff's do not have a groove to indicate such. Such as the Hamilton 992B or the Hamilton deck watch but they only have one staff which is friction. This particular staff has been marked because if you read carefully I suspect originally it might not have had a friction staff this was basically an upgrade. I know I've seen in the staffing assortments the blued hubs as a replacement components.    Then I'm attaching a PDF of Hamilton's thoughts on replacing balance staffs. Notice either the hub where the river can be cut away they don't have a preference it's whatever you like. Plus they mention the staff that is designed to break away. Although I have a suspicion you'll probably never see one of those as it would have to be an original staff and I suspect none of the after markets would have that feature. Hamilton technical data number 129 replacement of broken balance staffs.pdf
    • Thanks for shedding light on the exact problem — you're right, it's the centre tube, not the cannon pinion. That was the issue, and after tightening the centre tube, everything now sits correctly. The train bridge can be fully tightened and all the wheels run freely. I haven’t tested the pallet fork yet as I haven’t refitted it, but I’ll be doing that shortly to confirm if the issue is entirely resolved. @Neverenoughwatches Sorry for misusing the term earlier.
×
×
  • Create New...