Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello all,

 

I’ve been furiously modding and re-modding Seiko-based timekeepers over the last several months.

 

I’m chasing aesthetic experiments swapping handsets and dials zeroing in on my own ‘grammar of design’ while making much-needed improvements to my technical skills.

 

Two different dial/handset swaps I performed this week appear to suffer from what I theorize are fatigued handsets: the hour hand on each appear properly seated on the arbor but can slip with only a gentle knock to the side of the case.

 

Is there a ‘rule of thumb’ for how many times hands may be removed and re-pressed? Each of these handsets have been pressed 3 or 4 times so far.

 

Is there something in my technique that could have contributed? I use a plastic protection sheet over the hands and the symmetric hand pulling tool. I see no cosmetic damage.

 

Is there a way to gently improve the friction capacity or are the hands toast? I am an experienced bicycle, motorcycle, and car mechanic but am having trouble imagining a shim or knurling solution here.

 

Many thanks!

 

Ted

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Posted

Hi   Watch hands are usually only fitted once when new and when repairs are done, constant fitting and re fitting can stress the boss closing is possible but not always sucessfull . not something I would do myself.  Not all seiko canon pinnions and hour wheels are the same size, close maybe, check the part numbers for the models you are using against the tech sheets.

  • Like 1
Posted
11 hours ago, watchweasol said:

Not all seiko canon pinnions and hour wheels are the same size, close maybe, check the part numbers for the models you are using against the tech sheets.

The Seiko used for modifications all have the same hands sizes. Holes can be closed a little, either using a tool for the purpose or other techniques.

Posted

So far I’m only messing about w/ 7S26 and NH36a. I have assumed the hand sizes are identical but it’s a good in the “belt & suspenders” mode of diligence!

As far as tightening the openings of the hands goes: any tips? Is it as simple as gently cold-setting the flange inward?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, TedRzad said:

So far I’m only messing about w/ 7S26 and NH36a. I have assumed the hand sizes are identical 

Yes, they all are as well for the 4R, 6R, and others.

To avoid duplicated discussions I suggest you use the search function with a couple of keywords. 

Edited by jdm
Posted
Yes, they all are as well for the 4R, 6R, and others.
To avoid duplicated discussions I suggest you use the search function with a couple of keywords. 


Thanks, jdm

I did search for ‘hand fit’ prior ting this thread. Can you suggest a more precise terminology?




Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Posted
2 minutes ago, TedRzad said:

I did search for ‘hand fit’ prior ting this thread. Can you suggest a more precise terminology?

 

Loose hand maybe. Anyway what is done it to use an hollow,  rounded staking punch to close the ring. You could  try making one from a wood stick, pegwood or so.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • As others have pointed out we discussed this subject in great lengths multiple times on multiple discussion groups. Then we have a subject that has too many variables and generalizations that make all the different things seem like one common removing staffs when it's not. There are variety of balance wheels specifically designed to be hard enough to withstand knocking or pushing a staff out. Rolex has one that the only way the staff is coming out is by pushing it out enough pressure is applied the river breaks with a very satisfying pop. This is because they hairspring cannot be removed until the staff is pushed out through. Then of course Rolex has a nice set of tools just for this purpose. A variety watch companies like Elgin made a balance wheels specifically designed to be hard enough to withstand knocking the staff have. For instance that principle is applied with jeweling tool you mention and here's the complete article down below that explains the procedure. Then of course there are variety watch companies Elgin And Hamilton that specifically designed balance staffs designed to be knocked out because the riveting shoulder is supposed to break. That of course would be the original staffs and probably the aftermarket do not have such features.   One of the problems with all of these tools would be the balance staff itself and of course whatever the balance wheel is made of. Personally I like the rule of if you're knocking the staff out and you gently tap with the hammer and it doesn't just pop out then you do not drive it out you do have to use a lathe. Because for variety of reasons staffs that are perhaps over riveted not quite the right size soft balance arms etc. driving a staff out that doesn't really want to come out it's not your best interest to do that.   A variety of American companies used friction fit staffs. For instance here's an example of Waltham Here's something interesting from Hamilton a specific type of 992 with a specific type of hairspring. Normally the Hamilton friction staff's do not have a groove to indicate such. Such as the Hamilton 992B or the Hamilton deck watch but they only have one staff which is friction. This particular staff has been marked because if you read carefully I suspect originally it might not have had a friction staff this was basically an upgrade. I know I've seen in the staffing assortments the blued hubs as a replacement components.    Then I'm attaching a PDF of Hamilton's thoughts on replacing balance staffs. Notice either the hub where the river can be cut away they don't have a preference it's whatever you like. Plus they mention the staff that is designed to break away. Although I have a suspicion you'll probably never see one of those as it would have to be an original staff and I suspect none of the after markets would have that feature. Hamilton technical data number 129 replacement of broken balance staffs.pdf
    • Thanks for shedding light on the exact problem — you're right, it's the centre tube, not the cannon pinion. That was the issue, and after tightening the centre tube, everything now sits correctly. The train bridge can be fully tightened and all the wheels run freely. I haven’t tested the pallet fork yet as I haven’t refitted it, but I’ll be doing that shortly to confirm if the issue is entirely resolved. @Neverenoughwatches Sorry for misusing the term earlier.
    • If the existing spring is 0.06 then it's been replaced at some time in the past and would potentially be too weak for this movement.
    • A quick addition: Given when I measured the springs I got 1.5 x 0.06 I thought I'd figure out how long they are. I was able to do this from a photograph taken immediately above. The program Inkscape has a nice extension that allows measuring the length of a beizer curve, so I drew one along the length of the spring. It's 220mm. And 1.5 x 0.06x 220 x 7.0 does appear in the catalogue. It would also explain the lower amplitude I'm seeing.  Doesn't immediately solve anything, but the information is nice. 
    • That's because it's not a cannon pinion and just a centre tube. If this was the fault I still wouldn't have expected it to run without the balance. Edit @TimepieceTinkerer To clarify. Did you test the train ran smoothly with everything tightened down before fitted the fork and balance?  
×
×
  • Create New...