Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The Longines 6942 is quite straight forward to service but since it is equipped with the KIF-ultraflex shock absorber some might decide to just clean the whole balance in one-dip, oil it through the
jewel hole and leave it with that.
So here is a small walk through of how one might do to dismantle parts of the escapement to get this sorted out in a different way.

IMG_20190202_141225.jpg

Posted

When you look at the shock absorber through a Lupe you can se it has a wide and a narrow slot on the brass ring. On mine the narrower slot is positioned to the left.
With an oiler I push the spring on the narrow end downwards. the spring should pop up a bit so lift it up to the position you see in the picture.

IMG_20190202_142039.jpg

Posted

Cote a sharp peg wood with the Rodico and form a point. I think even Harry Potter would be envious at this magic wand!

IMG_20190202_142410.jpg

Posted

With this homemade precision tool pick up the jewel, sometimes you just get the cap first so you have to do this procedure twice.

IMG_20190202_142431.jpg

Posted


After cleaning put a small drop of oil on the flat side off the jewel. make sure it do not fill more than 40% of the surface area.

IMG_20190202_144132.jpg

Posted

Remove the balance bridge. 

Make it soak in the one-dip, even if it looks empty there is a fresh load of it in the jar. Cleanliness is a virtue ;)

IMG_20190202_145515.jpg

Posted

Take out the lower balance jewels in the same fashion as the top ones. This time the narrow slot was on the right side so one has to push upwards this time.

IMG_20190202_145706.jpg

Posted

Flip the movement, make sure no power is in the mainspring by lifting the click spring. Push the winding stem back in into the 
winding position. Gently wind an see if the train moves free. Make sure you clean the pallet fork jewel holes with a peg wood.

IMG_20190202_150903.jpg

Posted

Put back the pallet fork, apply some tension on the main spring and check the action on the escape with the peg wood. Move the pallet fork back and forth. Leave the pallet fork in the upper position.

IMG_20190202_151215.jpg

Posted

Put the balance bridge back, wind it up fully, it now should tick away like a Swedish viking on magic mushrooms.

IMG_20190202_151727.jpg

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, rogart63 said:

What use does the +- have on the beat error arm? 

Guess they just symbolize the direction to go when adjusting the beat error. It isn't like on the regulator where you make the spring length shorter or longer and by that increase or decrease the oscillation frequency. Should have been R & L since you center the impulse pin in relation to the pallet fork with it, 

Edited by HSL
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, HSL said:

It isn't like on the regulator where you make the spring length shorter or longer and by that increase or decrease the oscillation frequency.

Somehow statements like that comes back to bite you in the ass.
Even though this contraption is on the beat error arm it can be used to regulate the rate, python port regulator, hence the + and - .
It has a smal brass disk attached to the center of the small setting screw, it moves back and forth. Due to the friction between the brass disk and the regulator arm it moves it in micro steps. 
For some reason one always seen them but never given em a closer thought.
Here is a pic of a spare I had. Notice the easy studless hairspring attachment.
 

IMG_20190202_184817.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, HSL said:

Somehow statements like that comes back to bite you in the ass.
Even though this contraption is on the beat error arm it can be used to regulate the rate, python port regulator, hence the + and - .
It has a smal brass disk attached to the center of the small setting screw, it moves back and forth. Due to the friction between the brass disk and the regulator arm it moves it in micro steps. 
For some reason one always seen them but never given em a closer thought.
Here is a pic of a spare I had. Notice the easy studless hairspring attachment.
 

IMG_20190202_184817.jpg

i didn't see the screw. I thought it was a screw from the top. But it's a nice idea to be able to adjust the length of the spring. 



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I love my brass tweezers and use them for 90% of my work. I like that brass is soft and does not scratch parts and it seems to grip parts better than stainless steel. And brass is also non-magnetic, which really helps when working on quartz movements. However, brass is a little too weak for jobs like pulling back yoke springs. So I thought of upgrading to bronze. But I can't seem to find curved bronze tweezers. And Cousins price for a pair of Bergeon straight bronze tweezers is around £45. A couple of months back I had the idea of swapping out the carbon fibre tips of my tweezers and putting in bronze tips. And that is what I did. I got a piece of 2.0mm bronze sheet from AliExpress and cut out 2 curved tips and replaced the carbon fibre tips. I'll probably thin down the tip further gradually to a point where it still has strength to draw back thick yoke springs. 
    • Ah, well that's a relief, though the parts document does list a 1520 which is a coupling clutch. This threw me for a while (it's a quiet day in the office) until I realised I couldn't see a listing for the reverser wheels. So, we're back to the mainspring should slip in the barrel. It can really only be one of three things (that I'm aware of) mainspring 'coned' and pressing slightly on the lid the kink, close to the  end of the spring, which puts a sort of a self lock grip on the spring and may not allow the spring to release enough there to allow slipping quantity of lubrication, either not enough, or too little Two of those require new mainsprings, which aren't readily available, though I may post a query about alternative mainspring sizes. The third, will more grease or less be required? The word breaking in breaking grease suggests more means more breaking?
    • The idler gear I'm referring too is the one between the 2 barrel wheels. These movements just rely on the spring slipping to prevent over winding.
    • Not sure how useful this might be, but a while back I bought some bamboo tweezers (multipack with a ridiculous amount of them in) and have been using them in place of pegwood. Seems to be working just fine
    • Ah, well there is the rub. I ordered a post and oscillating weight, but clicked on the wrong thing when adding the weight to the basket adding an automatic bridge. Ordered a weight, and it's somewhere in the ether after our customs and excise folks rejected it because of the documentation.  Yes, both springs inserted the same. "Is the idler gear ok", and here's why I posted to the newbie area: So, reading between the lines, and again correct me if I'm wrong here, the automatic winding mechanism will have an ideler gear, along with the reverse wheels, that prevents over-winding? There is nothing (that I'm aware of) between the crown pinion, crown wheel, and the ratchet wheels to prevent over-winding other than the mainsprings slipping in the barrels.  This is only the second automatic I've worked on. The other, a Vostok, had a very obvious mechanism.  I shall look at the automatic winding mechanism in a bit more detail when I've a bit more time. At the moment I'm taking a glance here now and then when work is dragging 😉 As ever, thank you for your help. Always appreciated.  
×
×
  • Create New...