Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi all,

Here's another one my limited experience won't let me id.

There's virtually no Identifying marks anywhere on the movement and the watch dial states the brand "Ultra" which is an unknown to me.

The movement seems characteristic enough to enable identification but I'm not getting anything useful from ex. ranfft. I suppose it's a 30-40's movement that's been upgraded to take the Incabloc's?

Besides that it need a new setting lever spring, I have decent hope to get it running again.

Also, I added a photo to illustrate what over the top lubrication might look like.... :biggrin:

Grateful for any feedback!

 

 

IMG_3485 (redigerad).JPG

down.jpg

dial side.jpg

Posted

Another piece of info on this movement that might be useful for id as it stands out a bit (at least for me).

I have learned that on most movements the screw holding the crown wheel is left threaded and the one for the ratchet wheel into the barrel arbor is a common right threaded.

On this movement both are left threaded, something I don't think I have encountered before (and almost caused me thrashing the threads)

Useful ?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Posted

Another piece of info on this movement that might be useful for id as it stands out a bit (at least for me).

I have learned that on most movements the screw holding the crown wheel is left threaded and the one for the ratchet wheel into the barrel arbor is a common right threaded.

On this movement both are left threaded, something I don't think I have encountered before (and almost caused me thrashing the threads)

Useful ?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Posted

No immediate recognition but something that might be of interest to you is that if you go to ebay and do a search for item 142259872185 and then item 171670454415 both these movements have striking similarities to yours (although some differences too!).

The main point is that both these separate sellers refer to the movement as 'ETA Benrus' with the former narrowing it down to a 'Benrus AD10 ETA 810'. I realise this is then very different to the ETA 810 shown on ranfft but might at least give you some information to search on further (???)

 

Posted (edited)

Its a bit of a mystery this watch in that it could be identified as being made by two manufactures in flume it is down as a Nouvelle Fabrique Tavannnes cal 38 which is a 10.5 ligne movement the dial side of this watch is a exact match to the movement you have in your pictures and the hand setting parts are a exact match to the ones on your movement apart from your watch as a broken setting lever spring. The other maker could be a ETA calibre 38  listed in Catalogue Officiel which is also a exact match and also a 10.5 ligne movement this cant be coincidence as both manufactures also did a centre seconds version designated as a calibre 38-1 it must have be a collaboration between both manufacturers.

Just to muddy the water further Tavannnes originally called this movement a Eberle 38 

 

Correction :

 

I have miss read the the Nouvelle Fabrique Tavannes  watch symbol in Catalogue Officiel which is a E.T in a shield as E.T.A it is definetley a  nouvelle fabrique and Not a E.T.A I must get a pair of reading glasses ! I will leave the above mistake as a sign my own stupidity !:wacko:

Edited by wls1971
Old age, on set of dementia and eye strain
  • Like 1
Posted

Thanks for feedback!

The Tavannes 38 I find on ranfft is for sure identical on the dial side. And I guess the fact that the shown sample is a lot later than what I suppose mine is can explain for the significant differences on the other side.

I can imagine that bridges went through modernization while maintaining the basic design in other aspects?

Googling for Tavannes 38 an apparently similar discussion shows up from watchuseek in 2012. UnfortunatelyI can't seem to acces the pictures though.

This is a good start for further sleuthing and who knows, maybe I source a replacement for the setting lever spring from somewhere!

Posted

The setting lever and any other parts you may need are widely available on Cousins on the movement page select E.T/NFT the setting lever spring is £5.96

The bridges on movements when trying to identify watch movements in most cases tell you very little on a sterile unmarked movement it is the dial side that allows positive identification of movements it is the unique finger print of a movement, the bridges may vary widely but the geometry of the movement wheel train and balance will be the same.

Posted

Aaahhh... E.T. Is short for ebauches tavannes..?

And thanks for the hint regarding the the dial side characteristics being the identifying point. It's easy to get blinded by the cosmetics on the train side when (as you point out) it's the underlying geometry that counts.

Btw, the movement is now up and running nicely. Definitely worth a new setting lever spring!

And I attached a photo of the dial that many may find deteriorated but I see a "pointilistic charm" 1249d74070fa3fa5db648296c1a0e397.jpg


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

Aaahhh... E.T. Is short for ebauches tavannes..?

And thanks for the hint regarding the the dial side characteristics being the identifying point. It's easy to get blinded by the cosmetics on the train side when (as you point out) it's the underlying geometry that counts.

Btw, the movement is now up and running nicely. Definitely worth a new setting lever spring!

And I attached a photo of the dial that many may find deteriorated but I see a "pointilistic charm" 1249d74070fa3fa5db648296c1a0e397.jpg


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • it would be nice to have the exact model of the watch the or a picture so we can see exactly what you're talking about. this is because the definition of Swiss watch could be a variety of things and it be helpful if we could see exactly the watch your dealing with then in professional watch repair at least some professionals they do pre-cleaned watches. In other words the hands and dial come off and the entire movement assembled goes through a cleaning machine sometimes I think a shorter bath perhaps so everything is nice and clean for disassembly makes it easier to look for problems. Then other professionals don't like pre-cleaning because it basically obliterates the scene of the crime. Especially when dealing with vintage watches where you're looking for metal filings and problems that may visually go away with cleaning. Then usually super sticky lubrication isn't really a problem for disassembly and typically shouldn't be a problem on a pallet fork bridge because there shouldn't be any lubrication on the bridge at all as you typically do not oil the pallet fork pivots.  
    • A few things you should find out before you can mske a decision of what to do. As Richard said, what is the crown and all of the crown components made of . Then also the stem .  The crown looks to have a steel washer that retains a gasket. So be careful with what chemicals you use to dissolve any stem adhesives or the use of heat. You might swell or melt the gasket unless you are prepared to change that also . The steel washer maybe reactive to alum. Something I've just used to dissolve a broken screw from a plate. First drilled out the centre of the screw with a 0.5mm carbide . Dipped only the section that held the broken screw in Rustins rust remover. This is 40 % phosphoric acid. 3 days and the screw remains were completely dissolved, no trace of steel in the brass threads. A black puddle left in the solution.
    • I suppose this will add to the confusion I have a roller jewel assortment. It lists out American pocket watches for Elgin 18 size and even 16 size it's a 50. But not all the various companies used 50-50 does seem to be common one company had a 51 and the smallest is 43. American parts are always interesting? Francis Elgin for mainsprings will tell you the thickness of the spring other companies will not even though the spring for the same number could come in a variety of thicknesses. But if we actually had the model number of your watch we would find it probably makes a reference that the roller jewel came in different dimensions. So overlook the parts book we find that? So it appears to be 18 and 16 size would be the same sort of the arson different catalog numbers and as I said we don't have your Mongol know which Log number were supposed to be using. Variety of materials garnered her sapphire single or double but zero mention about diameters. Then in a section of rollers in this case rollers with jewels we do get this down in the notes section Roller specifications but of course zero reference to the jewel size. I was really hoping the roller jewel assortment would give us sizes it doesn't really. But it does show a picture of how one particular roller jewel gauge is used  
    • Seems to still do it through my mobile data, I use an android phone almost exclusively, but I'll double check it. Thanks mark Strange, I'll try my laptop that utilities edge. I've been on site half hour since I got home, it hasn't done it yet. Thanks John
    • At work, I'm on MS Edge, not through chose, on my phone, chrome, no issues with either. 
×
×
  • Create New...