Jump to content

Solar Powered Watches - Thumbs Up From Me

WillFly
 Share

Recommended Posts

WillFly Distinguished Member

WillFly

Posted
Posted (edited)

I don't like watches that use batteries, which I think are yet another part of "throw-away" culture, and I don't have any in my collection. For some reason I can't explain, I'm not a great fan of automatic watches either, though I do have just the one (a sturdy Seiko 5), or kinetics. Old-fashioned, hand-wound watches are really what I love.

 

However, the watch I wear when playing at functions where I'm loading and setting up equipment, or when going to the beach, or walking, etc., is a Seiko Solar. Here it is:

 

post-64-0-66497400-1404635362_thumb.jpg

 

It's a really good functional watch and fits snugly on the wrist. It's water resistant, needs no winding, no shaking and no batteries - and has a hacking second hand, so it can be set accurately. I suppose if the power charge is retained by a capacitor - like a kinetic - that may well need changing after some years, but it's a good, solid, reliable timepiece.

 

I've been looking at solar powered AND radio controlled watches, out of curiosity, but I haven't seen a model that appeals to enough yet - the dials tend to be like gas meters in the cockpit of a 747...

Edited by WillFly
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bobm12 Distinguished Member

bobm12

Posted
Posted

That's so true Will, apparently nice clean designs as they used to be are not "cool" anymore! I don't know where I read that watch designers and manufacturers alike are trying to find the ultimate appealing watch design to no avail. I hope they keep trying! (more variety in the market).

 

I personally agree with you and the watches you like with one exception, I do love automatics! And Seiko 5's are the ultimate simple, rugged, inexpensive and practical approach to those. Still, quartz and similar...I'm not too sure I'll ever completely accept them. Although I own different systems and wear them indistinctly, I still price my mechanicals and autos above any other type. Ultimately, I believe a vintage and/or mechanical watch based collection will eventually have more value (not just monetary) than quartz et al.

 

By the way, that is a beautiful Seiko! Classical lines, very appealing.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • VWatchie
      AS 554 from 1930

      By VWatchie · Posted

      I've also heard it called the "top side" and the dial side the "bottom side", which should make any non-repairer very confused. There are many examples and sometimes it comes down to personal preference. Personally, I like to say "dial train" whereas most other people would use the term "motion works".
    • mikepilk
      Chinese clone demagnetizers

      By mikepilk · Posted

      Is magnetism such a major problem that we (as home hobbyists) need to spend $$$ on a fancy demagnetiser? I use one of the cheap blue Chinese demagnetisers (£10 from ebay). It works, and has never failed to demagnetise a movement, or my screwdrivers. Magnetometer - who needs one?  Take a very small screw. If it sticks to the clean part, it is magnetised 🤣
    • Neverenoughwatches
      AS 554 from 1930

      By Neverenoughwatches · Posted

      My overall preference is to use traditional names and terms, that became my habit when i was taught joinery by old boy chippies 2 generations older than me , that had their time in the 40's. But what i often do is adjust the names and terms i use according to who I'm talking with. Sometimes i will say trainside and occasionally watchmaker's side. I try to find a balance between accommodating other folk ( there's no point speaking a foreign language to someone who doesn't understand it ) and using a name that appears to me to be more relevant as to its use or description. But using the name lever can be quite confusing,  some watches might have parts that are also levers, release levers, which in effect is what the pallet fork is, an escapement release lever. 
    • mikepilk
      Seiko 6309a diver crown replacement

      By mikepilk · Posted

      Then put the case number in here https://www.cousinsuk.com/category/filter/search-seiko-case-parts and it should give you the crown 
    • musicsnake
      Need Advice for Armoured Crystal

      By musicsnake · Posted

      I come across to replace the crystal of a 7734 chronograph.  What make it special there a printed chapter ring  which fits inside the recess of crystal before inserting into the case. I am thinking of a high dome crystal such as Sternkreuz ATCH, fitting diameter OD332/ID320.  For this purpose, tension ring will be removed and fit in the chapter ring.  I understand the crystal size may not perfectly fit these two dimension.  Should aim to find the right ID, then OD can be grinded to reduce without much difficulty.  To find the right crystal, the easiest way is to get know of the OD/ID relationship of Sternkreuz ATCH/ATCG (otherwise the OD of the crystal and tension ring).  I hope you are able to help to minimize the trial and errors.
×
×
  • Create New...