Jump to content

Speeding Up An Omega Electronic F300 Chronometer


Recommended Posts

Is it fairly simple to regulate one of these it is running 1 to 2 minutes slow per month. The watch is an Omega electronic f300 Chronometer from 1973. It is on its way to me and i don't have pictures of the insides yet. but this is what it looks like  it has a 37000000 serial number and a 1260 caliber movement

Thanks.

 

post-144-0-20943100-1397960069_thumb.jpg

post-144-0-18097600-1397960071_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow - I've never seen one of these before!

Made with technology licensed from Bulova if I remember correctly and in my opinion a better movement than Bulova. I have both so I feel justified to comment on them. My Omega is a Seamaster Cone F300 with the same movement as the one in this thread, and my Bulova is a genuine Space View.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Copied from another form:

Re: How are these movements regulated ? (F300)

There is a method of adjustment which is easy enough in theory but, as with so many things, takes a little work. Oh, and it takes ages to get it spot on.

First things first:

If you look at the movement you will notice that just after 12 (on this orientation) there are two minuses and a plus on the bridge. Here they are in close up and the other way up, just to offer a little challenge!

As you can see, while this version is a Zenith rather than an Omega it is still an ESA 9162.

Now, you see those two bobbins? They can be turned, very carefully, and a notch at a time, inwards and outwards. You need to mount the watch firmly and use two soft but sharp things, plastic needles are good (but toothpicks will do) to apply even pressure to both sides of the bobbin as you turn it. Don't use metal as it will scratch stuff up and leave detritus and don't use a single one as everything is rather carefully balanced

At least in theory, one notch of one bobbin is equivalent to two seconds in 24 hours. I have always alternated from one bobbin to the other (a notch left then a notch right and so on) and nothing has broken.

So, the usual deal: time the watch over 24 hours, do the maths and then, working one notch at a time, on both sides (and, most importantly keeping track of how many on a sheet of paper - to put it back right when you screw up!) adjust the difference.

Time it for another twenty four hours and then repeat the process with a smaller discrepancy and so on until you are reduced to trying to do half a notch. Then stop - beyond that madness lies

However, two warnings.

1) If the watch has not been serviced you will succeed in getting tolerable accuracy. The 9162 has torque to spare. Torque enough to destroy itself while working very nicely. Think about it! After a proper service you can reasonably expect to get accuracy you can brag about and you will be saving these wonderful movements for posterity!

2) Like any wristwatch, these are very, very easy to break. Ham fisted owners are, after stripped index wheels and leaky batteries, the most common reason for 9162 death. I'm all in favour of you breaking your watch this way as it increases my spares pool. You might feel differently. Buy a few old Accutrons and break them first if you do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ok a notch to the left and a notch to the right because the + sign is in the middle right?  I am guessing I would need the tool that fits the shape of the  three pointed"screw things" I don't know the technical names is there a screw to loosen first in order to make the adjustment? I found a really good technical right up on how to service these but it is for an Omega 1250 movement but I am guessing the principals are the same? Feel free to chime in because chances are most people would have more experience than me. The watch was cleaned and oils in the last 3 years , I just want to adjust so It isn't so far off. But I guess 2 minutes max per month isn't bad but I thought it being a "chronometer" rating that it would need to be within -4 to +6 seconds per day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The movement is based on the Bulova but the detail is very different.

Mine, like yours, keeps good time but like yours is not perfect. I am living with it as it is in the meantime.

As you probably have gathered I do like to work on my own watches, but when it comes to Accutrons and F300s I leave well alone. My Bulova will be getting sent to a specialist in the near future for a service and regulation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You realise 2 minutes a month is 120 seconds in ~60 days = 2 seconds a day, which is better than the 4 to 6 seconds a day you mentioned wanting it to be?

It sounds like one notch on each wheel will get it to virtually zero seconds a day but like you, I would definitely use the correctly shaped tool, shouldn't be too hard to whittle away at a piece of plastic or wood to make a three pronged tool that's close enough shape to work well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Geo, I'm just starting off in learning how to repair watches and clocks.

Picked up a load of junk movements from EBay to dismantle and learn how all the sub assemblies work, and to get used to working on components that small. Also got a few inexpensive new movements to dismantle and (hopefully) rebuild. Last couple of things I've picked up are a weight driven wall clock that needs a good restore.

Enough to keep me going for the spring and summer,

My number one problem is how to ensure those components that just love to escape, do not make it off the bench! I've thought of attaching male Velcro pads to the bottom of the rubber mat and just attaching the edge of it to myself so it forms a lip and prevents any parts escaping...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You realise 2 minutes a month is 120 seconds in ~60 days = 2 seconds a day, which is better than the 4 to 6 seconds a day you mentioned wanting it to be?

It sounds like one notch on each wheel will get it to virtually zero seconds a day but like you, I would definitely use the correctly shaped tool, shouldn't be too hard to whittle away at a piece of plastic or wood to make a three pronged tool that's close enough shape to work well.

Ya the 1-2 minutes per month sounded high when I wrote this post but it doesn't hurt to know how to make tiny adjustments to the movement is need be in the future.

Great help and thanks to everyone who submitted something useful to the post

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is not rare at all, the dial code and case code don't usually match.
    • Good question!! Anyone know of a substitute movement??!! 🤔🙏
    • Interesting issue that I just noticed: this Seiko 5actus Watch from 1977 has a calibre listing on the dial of 7019-8030R but on the case back it says 7019-8010!! Like a mis-printed coin, is this watch therefore worth a lot of money for its rarity?? 🤪😲🤔🤪
    • I wish that was the case. The Aegler movements used in the early days by Wilsdorf & Davis (for brands like Rolex and Rolco) came in several sizes and without designated calibre numbers that survive.  They become a bit easier to identify during the 1920s. Below is an Aegler-Rebberg, 25.74mm in diameter. It’s from a woman’s Rolex wristwatch. Stamped Rebberg and 500 on the dial plate (but it isn’t a Rebberg 500, it’s the wrong size).  I’d be interested if anyone can identify the movement.  It is based off the Aegler Nr.1, circa 1903, but they based many many calibres of different sizes on it. The closest I have to a positive ID is the  ‘Rolex Nr.50’ circa 1917, but no dial side images or movement sizes are available in the references. There are identical looking movements in many sizes.  The 25.74mm of this movement is a particularly strange size for the era, it equates to 11.41 lignes.      Best Regards, Mark
    • It looks like this movement comes with a number of different shock settings. Emmywatch shows that it comes in versions with no shock settings, 'Incabloc', 'shock resist', and 'Supershock'. Perhaps the different settings position the impulse jewel/roller table in a non-ideal position relative to the pallet fork/guard pin. Are you able to check under high magnification if the pallet fork and roller table are able to operate without any interference? Just for fun I took a look and I have one FHF 70 in my collection, a West End Secundus with a non-shock protected FHF70. I had a note with the watch that said, "Movement is stamped 'FHF 70', but the FHF70 looks to have sub-seconds instead of center seconds movement (??)" but that a google search turned up both types for this movement. EDIT: I just took a look in my parts drawer and I have a few of these movements, both in center seconds and sweep seconds, but they all are non-shock protected.  
×
×
  • Create New...