Jump to content

01 Binary Watch Battery


Alienfox

Recommended Posts

Hi den,

 

You definitely need to pop up that back (it is a "press on" according to the picture). Then you will see the battery (hopefully) and from it you can take what number it is, and replace it. It is common to find the CR type: CR 2025 or CR 2016, inside those: in fact, they are usually lithium based, the batteries. 

 

Worst case scenario, you might need to "lift" a section of the circuit board to find the battery if covered by it (or a second battery if the first doesn't solve the problem or there is a back up -- usually of different type) but it is not likely for this watch (I hope). The extra battery(s) setup for digital watches is very rare today and mostly used in cheap 2 movement ...or very expensive digital ones. Normal stuff is just one. (This watch doesn't have a calculator or 2 movements, etc).

 

Now, most likely the battery is held down by a springy metal plate and a couple of Philip head screws that keep the metal plate down. They most likely screw into plastic/board. Be careful of "(A)" screws flying away by means of the plate propelling them and "(B)" stripping the plastic where they go in...there are other "C" and "D" -- and a whole alphabet -- of things that can go wrong, including damaging the circuit but if you are careful and gentle those may never happen.

 

In the end, that back might need to be back on using a press to close it properly but, being the watch 3 atm, it just might go in by pressing with your fingers. Whatever the case is, don't put excessive pressure on the crystal but try to use the bezel instead to support the watch.

 

I hope this helps and that I'm giving you good advise...otherwise you'll be in trouble with your son!  :)

 

Cheers,

 

Bob

 

PS. Working on people's watches regardless how close and/or forgiving they be, is always a different experience!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, most people try to pry open by trying to insert the knife almost horizontally when in reality it should go almost vertical to avoid slipping and scratching the back. It is a normal thing even for beginner watchmakers until they get the hang of it. One thing about opening the back, specially when the knife is used improperly is that sometimes, and because the force exerted is so strong, the momentum carries the knife all the way, unchecked, and when we manage to stop it, it is half way inside the movement and the damage is already done. Therefore the "vertical" use of the knife, it won't go past the protective metal of the case, won't slip and won't mar the surface. :)

 

I personally prefer whenever possible to use this tool:

 

fb225.jpg

 

or a properly shaped watchmakers knife:

 

berg6987-10.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thanks, ManSkirtBrew.  I started looking for a setup like yours and ran across this.  It was about half the price of the JKA Feintaster (depending on what auction you were in), and it's a Bergeon.  I bought it because I thought the price was fair (eBay - Buy it now), and I'm a sucker for vintage tools. It also has a table, so it should be easy to use for measuring jewels. I wonder if the the contact points can be changed out. Bergeon seems to manufacture new tables and accessories for the contemporary dial version. What do you guys think of it? I'm sorry this post seems to have taken a detour. I'm new here so let me know if I should start a new topic.
    • This is a flying cutter, usual one. The cutter itself is shown in the pictures in the first message, it is made of broken tungsten carbide drill bit. I asure that all the angles of the cutter are as they should be. I have video - little older one - that I made when onse making the same kind of winding pinion for a Poljot 2200, which is even smaller than this one. It is not easy to see in the video, but the tool rest moves about 1mm towards the object in Y direction and then returns back untill cutter is rotating. Then the spindle is rotated one tooth ahead and everything repeated untill all teeth are cut.
    • After a bit further research could it possibly be an AS 970?
    • Latest project was a non-running ebay purchase with an FHF70 movement. I stripped and cleaned it, reassembled it, and got it running. So far so good, nothing damaged AFAIK.  I was oiling the top jewel on the balance (the one in the cock) which was a slightly unusual shock setting. I removed the spring (3 leaves) which was part of a chaton holding the cap jewel. This left the hole jewel behind which I retrieved with rodico and then lost it. I was taking it off the rodico, very gently as I thought, with tweezers, and then it just disappeared.  Fast forward a week, I got a donor movement, non-running, with the plan to just take the shock jewel that I’d lost. It was the same movement but had standard incabloc settings, and was steel rather than copper/brass.  I changed the cock and balance complete and it ran, not very well. I switched the lower jewel setting, cleaned and oiled both jewels and the replacement balance. Without the pallet fork the balance swings very nicely with a puff of air. With the fork in place, balance out, it flicks side to side nicely with power in the mainspring.  Put them together and it doesn’t run. The impulse jewel sits in the fork and it stops.      Any suggestions how I proceed? In case you didn’t follow that I have 2 FHF70 movements, nothing broken as far as I can tell, but mixing up the balance wheels and jewel settings results in a non runner. 
    • Oh and this almost perfect third wheel pivot and slightly set mainspring  Ah ok yes i see what you mean, good idea. I'll try that if i fluff this one up. The image isn't great quality but i like the idea though.
×
×
  • Create New...