Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Tool for removing or pressing the bezel? Most likely you have to remove the bezel (with a knife) before removing old crystal or inserting a new one. You can press the bezel with the crystal press if you have a suitable die with straight walls or otherwise a die that has enough clearance that it doesn't touch the crystal when pressing the bezel.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, zx6rfool said:

This will be my first crystal replacement, I have a press, but looking at the watch I wonder if I might need a bezel tool also.

It's difficult to tell, but my guess is it just looks like it has a bezel. Once you have removed the movement, you should be able to tell. Either way, I think you should be able to press out the old crystal from the inside as long as you have a die that properly supports the bezel around the crystal. So, take it apart first and then assess if any additional tools or actions are needed. Let us know how you do!

 

Edited by VWatchie
  • Like 3
Posted (edited)

From what I see, the crystal is made of mineral glass and is secured to the bezel with a sealing ring.

If you might want to replace the crystal without removing the bezel or the movement, I think it's possible, but risky. You have to suck out the old crystal without breaking it into tiny particles. I would not do that.

If you remove the movement first you can press the crystal out and press a new one in without removing the bezel.

Edited by Kalanag
  • Like 3
Posted

Well, turns out it was a fake bezel! The crystal is domed mineral glass and I was able to find a cheap replacement that should be here in two days. 

I used my crappy little press to pop out the cracked crystal, Ill give the case a good cleaning in the meantime and do a once over on the movement. 

 

 

PXL_20250424_221503679.jpg

PXL_20250424_221510219.jpg

PXL_20250424_221516525.jpg

PXL_20250424_214141739.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted

Double checked, definitely a fake bezel. It has a thin plastic gasket that creates the seal for the crystal. I went ahead and gave the case a good cleaning, and light polish. Now Im just hoping I can install the new crystal with out screwing up! I will likely be putting it in tomorrow night.   

Posted
20 minutes ago, zx6rfool said:

It has a thin plastic gasket that creates the seal for the crystal.

It can be a good idea to replace the gasket as well, especially if has any kind of damage. If it's a very tight fit between the gasket and the crystal, a thin layer of silicon grease on the gasket can help a lot. Keep us updated!

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
16 hours ago, zx6rfool said:

Double checked, definitely a fake bezel. It has a thin plastic gasket that creates the seal for the crystal.

For me a fake bezel looks like a bezel but is part of the case. I understand what you mean though.

Edited by Kalanag

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Believe the relume (not a fan) was done a long time after the damage. 
    • I can only think of some chemical reaction to reluming
    • I have a little milling attachment for my WW lathe, but very rarely use it and not for wheel and pinion cutting. For that I use a small Sixis 101 milling machine. I normally do direct dividing, but sometimes have to do an odd count and use the universal index which also fits on the Sixis.   Back in the day when I didn't have a mill, I would cut gearing on my Schaublin 102. It has a universal dividing attachment which fits the back of the spindle. Both it and the one for the Sixis are 60:1 ratio, and with the set of 4  index plates I can do almost any division. When I've had to do a strange high count prime number, I print a disc with the needed division and just place the plunger on the dot. Any position error is reduced by a factor of 60 so still plenty accurate.   The machines are a mess in the pics as I'm in the process of making a batch of barrels for a wristwatch 🙃.   This is the Sixis. The head can also be placed vertically, as can the dividing spindle.   Dividing plates. The smaller ones fit another dividing spindle.   Universal divider for the Sixis. I put it together with parts from an odd Sixis spindle that takes w20 collets, like the Schaublin 102, and a dividing attachment from a Schaublin mill.     The dividing attachment for the 102. The gear fits in place of the handwheel at the back of the headstock.   And the little milling attachment for the WW lathe. I just set it on the slide rest to illustrate the size, you can see from the dust on it it really doesn't get used much. I think only when I change bearing in the head, to kiss the collet head seat (grinding wheel still in the milling attachment).
    • I read a lot about the quality (or lack thereof) of Seiko's 4R, 6R, 8L  movements...or more specifically the lack of regulation from the factory. Especially when compared to similar priced manufactures using SW200's or ETA's. I thought I'd ask those more in the know, do the 4R's and 6R's deserve their bad reputation, is it fairly easy for someone with minimal skills (or better yet a trained watch mechanic) to dial in these movements to a more acceptable performance.    For background I spent more on a 1861 Speedy years ago, expecting that the advertised 0-15s/d  would probably perform more like 5-7s/d. In reality it's been closed to 2-4s/d. 
×
×
  • Create New...