Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello,

 

I have recently bought this watchmakers lathe and wanted to identify it's manufacturer. Since there is no maker's mark anywhere on the machine I started googling and found out that this thing is actually pretty odd in the way it was built.

Firstly the (presumably) hardened bed surfaces seem to have been screwed to the base and the screw heads ground over. I didn't find any similar lathe where this was done.

Second thing that I didn't find anywhere else is that there is no slot cut all the way through the bed so the normal method of attaching steady rests or cross slides to the bed with a bolt from the bottom isn't possible. Here it is done like in most head- and tail stocks with an eccentric clamping mechanism from the top to clamp both to the bed and the cross slide. Again something I haven't found else where.

Because of the color of the tarnished paint and overall style of the machine I believe it may be of american origin.

Another piece of potentially important information is, that I have another head stock of a more modern Boley and it fits the bed perfectly.

 

If you have ever seen something like this before or could give me any information at all I would be very gracious. And of course if you have any more questions I would be glad to answer them. Thanks

Greetings from Germany

s-l1600-_6_.png

s-l1600-_5_.png

s-l1600-_8_.png

s-l1600-_7_.png

s-l1600-_1_.png

s-l1600.png

s-l1600-_3_.png

s-l1600-_2_.png

s-l1600-_4_.png

  • Like 3
Posted
15 hours ago, oenkyi said:

Firstly the (presumably) hardened bed surfaces seem to have been screwed to the base and the screw heads ground over. I didn't find any similar lathe where this was done.

yes I would say this is definitely unusual I don't think I've ever seen this either. But their are quite a few people manufacturing lathes for watchmakers and instrumentation and toolroom use that all can look similar. In addition to stuff that was made for factories. With often times will find pictures of factory tools with no identifications no marking and no idea what exactly they were designed for

then this part of the lathe looks quite interesting any idea why it's been designed this way?

image.png.e221a58c07a0ec6471e3b31fc7227c5e.png

 

Posted
19 hours ago, Dell said:

Have you had a look at lathes.co.uk/ watchmaker lathe

Hi, yeah I have done a lot of researching there

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

yes I would say this is definitely unusual I don't think I've ever seen this either. But their are quite a few people manufacturing lathes for watchmakers and instrumentation and toolroom use that all can look similar. In addition to stuff that was made for factories. With often times will find pictures of factory tools with no identifications no marking and no idea what exactly they were designed for

then this part of the lathe looks quite interesting any idea why it's been designed this way?

image.png.e221a58c07a0ec6471e3b31fc7227c5e.png

 

Yeah I thought so too. It seems to be original since the paint is the same. My theory is, that it is either some sort of an attachment point for an indexing assembly or for a collet closer like this one.

image.png.d33162d76ee0f1d51e92a4012ed76edf.png

Edited by oenkyi
image blocking text
  • Like 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, caseback said:

Any other markings than the "256"?Screenshot_20250417_192550_Chrome.thumb.jpg.450c1582eb0d2100c2e4056aed40ec5f.jpg

 

 

Yeah there are some numbers punched into some of the parts. Namely the base of the tail stock:

signal-2025-04-17-194851.thumb.jpeg.48463fb1a86ef1927a4d8d19c6d100d5.jpeg

the mounting block between bed and cross slide:

signal-2025-04-17-194851_002.thumb.jpeg.f5780fd70c29317becd1da3e2855a786.jpegsignal-2025-04-17-194851_003.thumb.jpeg.d6290e13596d1536c093756970c601ac.jpeg

the head stock:

signal-2025-04-17-194851_004.thumb.jpeg.e7419f4f9044b6901d516553c2b9f39d.jpeg

and some components of the cross slide assembly:

signal-2025-04-17-194851_005.thumb.jpeg.a9c42b429af7898c7c10fc19020567d4.jpegsignal-2025-04-17-194851_006.thumb.jpeg.15fff0613db4fd3cf573b7939c583274.jpeg

Posted

The different numbers are a clue to the lathe being a collection of parts although saying that some manufacturers said that any parts they made would all fit each other part within tolerance 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Depends what sizes of watches you mostly service . If you were to say pocket watches then you might benefit by wholly replacing the 9010 for 9020. As a rough guide hp500 is twice the viscosity of 9020 which is twice the viscosity of 9010 at 20°c.  So hp500 would give you a more mid-range oil between thin 9010 and HP1300, but as it happens hp750 is more mid- range than hp500, but is that more or less useful when oiling a train of wheels. After the barrel arbor the jump down in pivot size is around half, then after the centre wheel maybe more than half until the escapement. And pivot size isn't especially a deciding factor, as the torque and speed of a pivot would be more relevant when thinking about which oil to choose. So 750 might only be useful on a centre wheel and nothing else, and 500 might be better than 1300 for oiling the centre wheel but still comprises the rest of the train, where 9020 would be ok for the train but too thin for the centre wheel, leaving only 1300 for the oiling of it. You see the problem we're having here. What can be ok for one thing is less ok for another in a different way, damping down power compared to oil spread.  Maybe mixing a drop from two opposite range viscosity synthetic oils will give you some approximate thickness oil in-between . You want a short answer now,  I tnink I'd go with the 9020. Now be prepared for a whole host of different answers.
    • So, working on watches and your karma at the same time: win-win situation! 
    • @SteveF ,  Go on to Dr ranfft website,  Enter keywords Omega 26.5T3  ranfft .  There Dr ranfft  has listed all related calibers to this family, all which beat the same frequency,  any balance complete of this family fit your watch. This would only expenad your choice of balance complete.  Recolleting your hairspring is easy, but matching it with a balance of the family is challanging. Regs        
    • Yes, it looks much better, but at this point the main thing is to make the spring in one plain. so picture from side will show this better. Now it is seen that #1 bending is needed, which is normal.
×
×
  • Create New...