Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

You're probably not going to see a dramatic change but you should probably figure out what the lift angle is as it probably is not 52°

No it's not 52. I had looked at the Pocket Watch lift angles thread, which lists Elgin 6s as something really high like 62° but visually that is not at all what this watch is doing. I think 42° is more correct and that's where my machine is setup.

The watch has a million problems but I have made solid progress. Impulse jewel replaced. Hairspring didn't match the balance (which also doesn't match the serial) but I got it down into range this weekend with 8 or 10 huge timing washers. Replaced the mainspring, balance and train are nice and free. At this point it is running consistently and in beat at about 160°, the third wheel has a bend that sends the timegrapher on a little roller coaster every 8 minutes or so. Remaining amplitude problems may be down to the escapement. The banking pins were way out and it didn't run at all before I started. It has one of the old brass escape wheels rather than steel, and I assume the faces its teeth are probably worn or scored in a way I can't yet fix (or see without a microscope). I know this watch is not going to run above 250° but I am going to keep trying to get above 200.

But the best part about this watch? Some unscrupulous person stamped "21 JEWELS" on the train bridge sometime in the past, right on top of the Damascening. It's a 15 jewel movement.

image.png.065f6d91bf88cbcbf75740db2664393d.png

  • Like 2
Posted
3 hours ago, mbwatch said:

sends the timegrapher on a little roller coaster every 8 minutes or so.

I just went back in & found a speck of pegwood dust in the 3rd wheel pinion so that probably explains it.

  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, mbwatch said:

No it's not 52. I had looked at the Pocket Watch lift angles thread, which lists Elgin 6s as something really high like 62° but visually that is not at all what this watch is doing. I think 42° is more correct and that's where my machine is setup.

typically any time people talk about a pocket watch lift angle list I find it's the one that I gave out. Amusingly I've even seen it quoted on another discussion group that they found this list. then if you look carefully at the list you'll notice that it's not just the Elgin six size but also a Illinois six size is 62°. what becomes interesting if you look at the list is there's a lot of variations in lift angles for particular watch sizes. So basically this means if  your timing machine does not seem to be giving you whatever you perceive you're supposed to be getting you should verify that the lift angle is indeed correct for your watch as there seems be lots of variations with pocket watches even amongst the same size.

Then unfortunately on every single pocket watch you do  especially with movable banking pins is you do have to verify that they are where there supposed to be. It seems to be that anything that's movable on a watch will get moved just because it can be moved.  It's amazing moving banking pins playing with the pallet jewels  how poorly a watch can run..

 

 

  • Like 1
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

My kid woke me up at 2:00 a.m. I couldn't get back to sleep so I decided to go to the workbench. I was to tired to work on a watch so I decided to dress up tweezers and screwdrivers while having a drink and listening to some music.

 

 

1000120794.jpg

Luckily I got a comforting nap after lunch and started working on this beautiful Raketa Big Zero.

 

IMG_20250511_165514261.jpg

  • Like 5
Posted
15 hours ago, MariusJacob said:

My kid woke me up at 2:00 a.m. I couldn't get back to sleep so I decided to go to the workbench. I was to tired to work on a watch so I decided to dress up tweezers and screwdrivers while having a drink and listening to some music.

 

 

1000120794.jpg

Luckily I got a comforting nap after lunch and started working on this beautiful Raketa Big Zero.

 

IMG_20250511_165514261.jpg

2609 HA, solid reliable workhorses, and lots of donors around for this calibre in the UK. One of my favourite movements.

  • Like 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

2609 HA, solid reliable workhorses, and lots of donors around for this calibre in the UK. One of my favourite movements.

I agree, also really comfortable to work with. 

Posted

I spent a significant amount of time searching on and around a bed/fleece blanket for a click ball from a 6105 after a misadventure... Imagine how pleased I was when I found it! 

 

(I should probably secure that now I know it can come out with the bezel off)

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This watch has a pin end mainspring. It's a blued steel spring and may be the original >100 year old part. As you can see, it is quite set. Can anyone suggest where I might be able to obtain such a spring today? Dimensions: Height: 140 Thickness: 010 Arbor diameter: 340 Barrel diameter 989 (1/100 mm)  
    • Many thanks for your answers: 1. I will clean both of them without risk 🙂 2. Both of the rotate inside their setting but they don't seem to come out. I will clean the cock (and the hole jewels) and I will see if they want to go out. I don't intend to force the setting pushing it out by any means. I only hope I don't need the dismantle the whole cock into all its components...! 3. I won't touch it. Only clean. I don't want to take risk... Thanks again! Thanks for your anwer. Yes, I meant short. In fact there are 2 pictures where It can be seen that the balance almost touch the main plate. The balance only spin freely when I loosen the cock screw and also the bottom jewel setting. I cleaned the exterior jewels on the cock and on the main plate. But I can't take the interior settings. I uploaded 1 picture on this  My reply to your comments are below. Apologies as I Replied rather than quote... 
    • By worn pivot, Do you mean short ?   A pivot is not short if balance spins freely on it. Dial up & dial down tests are good test for investigation, visual test alone doesn't suffice. A thorough test is free oscilation, which is best done when balance cock is adjusted with acceptable end shake. Balance settings on both side should be dismantled as they must be cleaned, pegged and inspected.  Stud & pivot & where spring leaves the collet are on one line, show entire coil and where you think is bent, please. Regs  
    • 1. I think the pivots look pretty good and I wouldn't worry about wear. 2. Yes, I think the hole jewels should come out for cleaning, complete with their spring setting. I don't have experience with Rolex but I've seen this spring type setting in another movement. They may be stuck in with old dried oil. 3. Yes, I think the overcoil is out of shape.
    • Yes, I'm looking at this option. I have a good friend from childhood who happens to be a goldsmith, and he would certainly be able to tackle the second hole to my specifications. I usually avoid this path because, since he deals with gold pieces, every time he stops to help me with "frugal" parts, he is objectively losing money. I agree with you. Even though I couldn't justify paying this much for the set (they only sell the whole set or the sole case tube), I understand the price tag. The trouble with this particular stem set is that the most common use case for it is the Technos Skydiver, a watch whose price certainly justifies 220 USD for a brand-new stem set.   I have messaged them only on the surface, without specifying my needs. They already stated that they don't sell the single female part, only the full set. What I still don't get is the need for a second hole. Is it supposed to be some sort of regulation, meaning that I can fit the head of the male part in any of the two holes to adjust the pressure of the spring? Does this mean that a single-hole female part has a chance to work with my setup? I'll later test this hypothesis while continuing the assembly of the movement. Some photos are attached. Can you judge this bracelet? It was dirt cheap (4 USD), genuine leather, wife's choice. I have just realized my dial is upside down. lol
×
×
  • Create New...