Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm just starting out with learning to service and repair watches,  but I have acquired a number of watches and movements to practice on.

Some things that have ended up in my collection I am setting aside at first,  until I have developed some skill,  and have become somewhat less clumsy and ignorant.  Mainly they are things that look like more of a challenge,  or that I think are a bit special and therefore I don't want to risk damaging them.

So here is the first one - it was in a group of about six pocket watch movements that I bought on EBay about fifteen years ago. It's an English key-wind fusee movement that I think is from some time around 1850.  Transaction details are lost in time,  but I think I paid about $50 for the six movements.

20240921_121827.thumb.jpg.60d5855f57a85d9243db68591747c86d.jpg  

20240921_121853.thumb.jpg.20a13a2046b75be9d9078754afe4b33b.jpg

It is signed by Savory and Sons of London.  According to Loomes,  they were active from 1839 to 1863.

The balance staff appears to be broken, but the fusee chain is intact and in place.

20240921_122518.thumb.jpg.aa697a2fd6b42b03049a8a8f490a74bf.jpg

 

20240921_122306.thumb.jpg.3bbd401c520dc22e4a756a121e832a93.jpg

The dial looks OK,  but there are no hands,  and the sub seconds arbor looks bent.   Of course,  there is no case. 

20240921_123058.thumb.jpg.937e755b0aa58d3aa57fa4768ad77a09.jpg

Question:  Would that square on the arbor be for setting the hands?

 

 

Posted (edited)
  On 12/6/2024 at 11:52 AM, AndyGSi said:

Strange how the movement is marked Coinhill but everywhere I look for Savory & Sons it's listed as Cornhill?

image.thumb.png.4739b4fd969137e419fdd2069d50bb1c.png

Expand  

Spelling lost in translation...English engaving to English text lol. I think the engraver actually messed up and then tried to rectify it with a half attempted r. Notice the apostrophe over the r and the enlarged over the i dot with half the r.....and then he thought "oh fuk it " 😅

Thats a big piece to mess-up and have to remake , one of the lads may have done it and then probably got a good hiding when the old man saw it. 😅

Edited by Neverenoughwatches
  • Like 1
Posted
  On 12/6/2024 at 11:52 AM, AndyGSi said:

Strange how the movement is marked Coinhill but everywhere I look for Savory & Sons it's listed as Cornhill?

Expand  

Wow!  I had been reading that as "Cornhill",  but when I compare it with the second "i",  I can see what you mean.   Now you've pointed it out,  it is impossible to unsee. 😅

 

  On 12/6/2024 at 1:30 PM, Neverenoughwatches said:

I think the engraver actually messed up and then tried to rectify it with a half attempted r. Notice the apostrophe over the r and the enlarged over the i dot with half the r.....and then he thought "oh fuk it " 😅

Expand  

Probably ruined his whole day,  or worse.   I wonder if it was an apprentice,  and if he tried to cover up his own mistake,  or perhaps someone helped him.

  On 12/6/2024 at 1:30 PM, Neverenoughwatches said:

Thats a big piece to mess-up and have to remake , one of the lads may have done it and then probably got a good hiding when the old man saw it. 😅

Expand  

I do wonder what life would have been like in that workshop,  40 years or so before my grandfather was born.  Like something from a Charles Dickens novel perhaps.   I don't suppose they would have imagined that 170 years later, their watch would end up in Australia,  with an amateur wondering about how to repair it.

  • Like 2
Posted

OK, here's my next one.

Sometime around 2007,  I had the opportunity to buy some things from a clock and watch hobbyist who was moving to aged care.   Basically there were two cartons of stuff,  and he was asking for $100,  "take it or leave it."   One of the cartons had a number of chiming clock movements and chime blocks with their rods,  and these were what interested me at that time,  so I handed over the hundred and took the boxes home.

On arrival,  I unpacked the cartons,  and discovered I had also bought a couple of shoe boxes of watch parts,  including many crystals,  some balances and other things,  and a few wristwatches.

I put the watch items away in a cabinet,  and didn't look at them again until recently.  Some of the watches look interesting,  including a very lovely Bulova,  that seems to have nothing wrong with it except a broken crystal.

Another one,  a Seiko,  looked to be a real basket case.  It seems to have spent a number of years in "wristwatch hell." I can't imagine what happened to it to leave it in this condition:

20241206_191855.thumb.jpg.83343c9d0995fbd539c2ca8fd0a10839.jpg

Yes,  it's a 6139-6001.  Not quite a Pogue,  since I think this is an earlier model than the watch that the Colonel took to Skylab,  but still very interesting.

The dial looks corroded,  there are no hands,  the stem is broken,  the bezel ring looks really beat up, and the crystal is badly scuffed.

And it gets worse!

20241206_191928.thumb.jpg.6536111c510508977b2e1d02d067fdd2.jpg

There is rust.  The case ring seems to be wrongly fitted so that it jams the winding weight and also prevents the case back from being screwed on.

At least I still have the case back.  A 1971 model by the look of it.

20241206_192015.thumb.jpg.1aee2d9f2e73d8d5f7385527dd40e9b8.jpg

The watch appears to have been stored in  an open box in a garden shed for a number of years before I got it.  I now have it stored in a dust proof plastic box,  but when I took it out and put it on the mat to take these pictures,  I'm fairly sure some body parts of a long-dead cockroach fell out of it. 😱

(Sorry,  I didn't think to take a picture of those,  but I am confident that they were not anything made by Seiko.)

20241206_192155.thumb.jpg.2b91fa042883fb2c304065a378c130e4.jpg

Oh yes,  one of the pushers is also missing,  and the other one is jammed.  I have bought a replacement stem,  but just the basic one,  not the one with the small wheel that operates the inner ring.

I know that parts for these are very expensive,  and original dials impossible,  so what do you think guys?

Would you say that this one is too far gone to be worth restoring,  or should I give it a try when I have enough experience to work on a chronograph movement?

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Be interesting to see the dial once the crystal has been removed.

I've seen worse bezels on watches being sold and the movement doesn't look
in too bad a state and NOS parts are still available if not a donor movement.

Edit

Just realised that looks like the wrong crown.

Edited by AndyGSi
  • Thanks 1
Posted
  On 12/10/2024 at 12:04 PM, ChrisInOz said:

OK, here's my next one.

Sometime around 2007,  I had the opportunity to buy some things from a clock and watch hobbyist who was moving to aged care.   Basically there were two cartons of stuff,  and he was asking for $100,  "take it or leave it."   One of the cartons had a number of chiming clock movements and chime blocks with their rods,  and these were what interested me at that time,  so I handed over the hundred and took the boxes home.

On arrival,  I unpacked the cartons,  and discovered I had also bought a couple of shoe boxes of watch parts,  including many crystals,  some balances and other things,  and a few wristwatches.

I put the watch items away in a cabinet,  and didn't look at them again until recently.  Some of the watches look interesting,  including a very lovely Bulova,  that seems to have nothing wrong with it except a broken crystal.

Another one,  a Seiko,  looked to be a real basket case.  It seems to have spent a number of years in "wristwatch hell." I can't imagine what happened to it to leave it in this condition:

20241206_191855.thumb.jpg.83343c9d0995fbd539c2ca8fd0a10839.jpg

Yes,  it's a 6139-6001.  Not quite a Pogue,  since I think this is an earlier model than the watch that the Colonel took to Skylab,  but still very interesting.

The dial looks corroded,  there are no hands,  the stem is broken,  the bezel ring looks really beat up, and the crystal is badly scuffed.

And it gets worse!

20241206_191928.thumb.jpg.6536111c510508977b2e1d02d067fdd2.jpg

There is rust.  The case ring seems to be wrongly fitted so that it jams the winding weight and also prevents the case back from being screwed on.

At least I still have the case back.  A 1971 model by the look of it.

20241206_192015.thumb.jpg.1aee2d9f2e73d8d5f7385527dd40e9b8.jpg

The watch appears to have been stored in  an open box in a garden shed for a number of years before I got it.  I now have it stored in a dust proof plastic box,  but when I took it out and put it on the mat to take these pictures,  I'm fairly sure some body parts of a long-dead cockroach fell out of it. 😱

(Sorry,  I didn't think to take a picture of those,  but I am confident that they were not anything made by Seiko.)

20241206_192155.thumb.jpg.2b91fa042883fb2c304065a378c130e4.jpg

Oh yes,  one of the pushers is also missing,  and the other one is jammed.  I have bought a replacement stem,  but just the basic one,  not the one with the small wheel that operates the inner ring.

I know that parts for these are very expensive,  and original dials impossible,  so what do you think guys?

Would you say that this one is too far gone to be worth restoring,  or should I give it a try when I have enough experience to work on a chronograph movement?

 

 

 

 

Expand  

Look up Seiko Pogue. Right time frame, if dial is original with water resist 70m to the right of 9, could have some value.

Posted
  On 12/10/2024 at 5:46 PM, Razz said:

Look up Seiko Pogue. Right time frame, if dial is original with water resist 70m to the right of 9, could have some value.

Expand  

Being 1971 and a 6001 a lot of people call this a pre pogue but would still have some value if working even in half decent condition.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
  On 12/10/2024 at 7:36 PM, AndyGSi said:

Being 1971 and a 6001 a lot of people call this a pre pogue but would still have some value if working even in half decent condition.

Expand  

I was thinking Capn Pogue's was a September '71 anything from Feb 1971 to April 1972 with sieko automatic, water resist 70m and the Suwa on the dial should be a true pogue. But the caseback 6001 is wrong and needs to be 6005...

  • Thanks 1
Posted
  On 12/10/2024 at 12:14 PM, AndyGSi said:

Just realised that looks like the wrong crown.

Expand  

Thanks.   That broken stem, with crown attached,  was (loosely)  in the watch when I received it,  so perhaps it was part of a repair attempt by the previous owner.

Posted

I serviced one similarly rust damaged "blue Pogue" a while ago. Fortunately the critical parts were in good condition and the chrono wheel was good. It made a good beater. Even though there's heavy rust the wheels don't often get corroded at all. I say you service the movement, relume the dial and get the missing parts. The stem with the wheel is hard to find but I think aftermarket alternatives do exist. I even made a video of mine, of course it's narrated in Finnish so it's no use to anyone. It's got almost whopping 300 views!

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
  On 12/10/2024 at 8:53 PM, Razz said:

I was thinking Capn Pogue's was a September '71 anything from Feb 1971 to April 1972 with sieko automatic, water resist 70m and the Suwa on the dial should be a true pogue. But the caseback 6001 is wrong and needs to be 6005...

Expand  

The 6005 is the only true Pogue in mine and a lot of other peoples opinion as being the US variant.

Posted

I tried to get some better pictures of the dial a couple of days ago.  Haven't been able to free it from the case though,  it appears to be stuck in place by dirt and corrosion.

20241211_164319.thumb.jpg.6536a42bd926e3e6437fa0bfd8805516.jpg

20241211_165316.thumb.jpg.41b042438a5e0fb74afc01796fa30c75.jpg

20241211_165403.thumb.jpg.1b528ee9ef4652d1e2e15ff6b511dcec.jpg

20241211_165443.thumb.jpg.9a849415f9f55affff35d5b7f05f369c.jpg

The movement doesn't look too bad

20241211_164628.thumb.jpg.7003d3e2d48558ca0f3e539922501376.jpg

20241211_164701.thumb.jpg.2827c2316ddfb46df2ef8fabe26663b4.jpg

but somebody has been very cruel to the case ring.

20241211_165024.thumb.jpg.d662890123c493b49767d96bb0bbb88f.jpg

 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You shared this test with me a few months back on a Hamilton project and so I had checked this watch to find the pins were still equally spaced. Their screw slots were undamaged and very tight hard to move so maybe no one has messed with them before. I can't work on it much today but I did measure the fork slot again and it seems like 0.44 is the right size. I measure the jewel that had been installed at just 0.42. would an undersized too narrow impulse jewel impact the impulse drastically? I ask because I have had it at a state where flipping the fork manually with a tool would unlock some of the time, but the balance was never capable of unlocking.
    • This was what I was afraid of. The movement is not one of the generic black square modules. Remove the movement from the clock and try prying it open very carefully, without breaking the plastic tabs. The plastic might be brittle from age. Clean the wheels and check the battery contacts for corrosion. Check the PCB for bad solder joints. Take plenty of photos along the way.
    • One of the problems with trying to Photograph Phils things are that his enjoyment was building these things so they tended to E falls on what will see if I can find some earlier pictures or any pictures I wasn't even sure because I was looking for that specific picture for somebody else and even it got the last version and that would have been the last version. You will note that he put the indexing on something that he could unscrew it or whatever and it can slide back out of the way so the rest of the lathe can be used as a lathe. With the lathe cut are actually coming down from the top I was there once where he demonstrated how to cut a pivot with the setup it was really beautiful. Older set up if I remember it's not a worm gear assembly in the thing in between the stepping motor and the holding block I believe this particular one was like a 100 to 1 gear ratio. Earlier version with watchmaker's lathe. Even looks like he is the watchmakers bed and then switch to something he made. Then I do have other pictures and things of the rotary stage in use. In the raw so if you tube videos here is an example of one were somebody's mounting a three jaw chuck. At one time there were available on eBay they were not cheap but if you're patient like I was I found one cheap on eBay. After you watch the video it look at his other videos he is a whole bunch of other examples of the same rotary stage. That I do know there are other pictures examples and possibly videos you just have to track them down. One of the minor issues of finding this particular tech sheet for the unit is I believe it was a custom manufacturer and the company change their name but I remember the new name here's a link to the company https://www.ondrivesus.com/rino-mechanical-components                
    • Escapement adjusting always interesting and depending upon the reference always confusing. Okay maybe it's not always confusing but it does lead to confusion. I have a PDF below it's actually a whole bunch of separate stuff including a hand out that came from a lecture that's on you tube. Then from that we get this image Consequences of doing things especially if you do things out of order or you do things for the wrong reason. Oh and even if the watches working I made the mistake one so showing my boss how tweaking the banking pins on a full plate on the timing machine made the amplitude get better and now he thinks that's what they're for and I don't think a fully grasped exactly what horn clearance means. Consequence of doing things. Notice what it says about opening and closing the banking pins and total lock? So yes I've had that on a full plate where it won't unlock at all and that's the banking pins or a combination of things basically. So banking pins unfortunately get moved. One of the ways to tell if it's been moved is the look straight down at the end of the fork with the balance wheel removed. Power on the fork push at the one side look at it push it to the other side also look at it and compare anything with the center reference the balance jewel and see if both sides of the same. No guarantee after the same there in the right place but at least are the same typically when people play with things one side will be way off from the other because they had no idea what they were doing at all because of course it's a full plate and you really have to paying attention and even then there's still hard to do. Then the other thing that comes up like it shows below is people often adjust the banking pins to do all those other things as opposed to horn clearance which is all that it's therefore and maybe bonus Guard pin clearance although you're supposed to deal with the guard pin is a separate thing like single roller gets bent in Or out or sometimes physically gets moved in and out. Some full plates older escapement's typically pallet forks held together with screws and you can actually unscrew and move the entire assembly in Or out more complications to deal with.     Escapement handout wostep nscc.pdf
    • If he was much younger and some sort of sports player it wouldn't be a problem. They would be in there and doing surgery and he'd be back on the field in no time. Unfortunately when you get older little things are bad and big things can be really bad so not good at all.
×
×
  • Create New...