Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi Everyone,

I'm looking for help in replacing a mainspring, if possible.  I have a Vostok 2809.  The end has a little cross grove with an additional piece of metal attached to it.  I believe it's what Cousins calls a DB end, but nothing in the width, strength or length is available.  They have plenty of T end mainsprings in stock however for cheap.

The barrel ID is 12mm, and the available inner height is 1.6mm. I calculated a strength of 0.138 or so. 

Thanks in advance for any tips, including leaving it alone.  🙂

 

 

Posted

Hi @AndyGSi - Thank you so much for  that, searching was really hard for me.  I managed to find a stronger DB end of 0.15 as a reasonable substitute. 

I think it's a DB instead of DBH, but not sure if there's a practical difference.  I've taken apart a donor mainspring barrel and this is what I've found:

Donor mainspring Width: 1.88mm, thickness: 0.13 mm

Barrel Inner depth: 2.25mm

Barrel ID: 12mm

Lid thickness: 0.56mm

If I do the math for the width correctly (2.25 - (0.56+0.1)) = 2.25 - 0.66 = 1.59

What do you think??

Posted (edited)

@AndyGSi Also curious what to expect substituting what may be a 70 year old mainspring for a brand new one. 

Doing a little more testing, the watch slows down and gets up to 270 degrees of amplitude when on a full wind. Teeters out in a few minutes after that though.  Sorry, still need to do the free oscillation testing, just want to let her run a couple of days before I feel like i know where she's at, then I'll do more.

A little more info:  The lid is hollow.  That is, there is a lip at the edge approximately 0.2mm.  So do I count the lid thickness as 0.56, or 0.36? If 0.36 then I still don't get to 2mm but 1.79mm, still shy of 2.

 

Edited by NigelTufnel
Posted
32 minutes ago, NigelTufnel said:

I managed to find a stronger DB end of 0.15 as a reasonable substitute. 

You may find that the 0.15 is too powerful.

Can you post photos of the barrel and lid as I would have expected the
Zenith 135 spring to be something that's wouldn't change on the Vostok.

Posted (edited)

@AndyGSi Apologies for the lack of focus, but you can see the insides of both along with the end of the mainspring.  For the record, this is the donor, which is just like the one ticking right now, so I've not bothered to clean it.  I did NOT leave the other one in this shape!:

image.png.3f14e53220afcdd00267b349046a5070.png

Edited by NigelTufnel
Posted

What I see is that the donor spring width is almost 1.9. The original will be the same. This only means that the measurements are nod that correct. And yes, the lid thickness is the smallest thickness, not with the lip. If the amplitude varies, then check what I have written about the 3rd wheel in previous message.

  • Like 1
Posted

I think you need to check the measurements again as the 1.9mm is heading towards the 2.0mm of the Zenith 135.

28 minutes ago, nevenbekriev said:

PS If the amplitude gets to 270, then no point to change the spring

@NigelTufnel If it teeters out after a few minutes what does it drop too?

Posted
56 minutes ago, NigelTufnel said:

@AndyGSiI did a full wind this morning, 3 hours later its' +32s/d at 221 amplitude.  Yesterday it pretty much held this all day.

They don's sound that bad for an old spring.

What lift angle are you using?

Posted
5 minutes ago, AndyGSi said:

They don's sound that bad for an old spring.

What lift angle are you using?

I'm using 44.  I've read somewhere 44 to 46 was the correct amount.  It's not too bad, but the speed is too high to regulate.

Posted
1 hour ago, NigelTufnel said:

I'm using 44.  I've read somewhere 44 to 46 was the correct amount.  It's not too bad, but the speed is too high to regulate.

Yes 44 is correct.

45 minutes ago, NigelTufnel said:

Folks, turns out my digital calipers have too much play in the depth rod.  Can anyone recommend calipers or a micrometer with small enough feeler/depth gauge to work in a 12 mm barrel?

I've got this. You can zero it with the thickness of the base and then just measure the overall to give the internal.

https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B07K2VC3KR/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_search_asin_title?ie=UTF8&psc=1

Posted
7 minutes ago, NigelTufnel said:

That looks pretty but no idea how to measure inside the barrel with those big anvil faces. 

I can't remember the size and it's at work but the part that moves is small enough to easily fit inside a 12mm barrel.

  • Like 2
Posted
2 hours ago, mikepilk said:

I use cheap calipers like this. They are accurate enough for most uses. When I check against my micrometer, they are pretty close.

 

image.png.151cf532a84867e752057e6e85261dbe.png

The problem with these is trying to use the depth gauge when it waggles about on something that's only a few mm.

  • Like 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Righty ho, I re-serviced the chrono module and got a reasonable result with minimal loss of amplitude when not running the chrono and about 30 degrees loss when running. Great. The problem is now that the chrono (and movement) stops running after about a minute or so, a tap on the watch starts it running again. No issues with the movement running when the chrono is stopped. Going to service it yet again, obviously some residual issues with friction in the chrono module (Very frustrating - I wish there was some way of testing it as I go!) I also seem to have a problem with the cannon pinion where the movement is running continuously (with the chrono stopped) but it's losing significant time / stopping. This is one of those two piece ETA style with a driving wheel pressed over the cannon pinion, obviously arranged for driving the chrono module. I had no issues with this prior to service and just added a small amount of grease between the driving wheel and the centre cannon pinion as the technical guide required. What's the best way of tightening these up? I would like to replace it but I guess this is going to be hard to find as it is dedicated to the DD chrono movement. 
    • He uses the micrometer cap, but he leaves the spring out (you can see that in the video). If you leave the spring in, the spindle will move up as well (as shown by @Knebo).
    • Seems like he doesn't have the micrometer cap  attached to the spindle so he can only push down but cannot pull up? If the cap screws into the spindle I guess you don't need the spring? I only have a "normal" Seitz so I really have no idea. 
    • Do you have a part number for the bearing shim lock tool?
    • Yes in my opinion the 3/4HP is plenty but it’s your decision & yes it does come with speed control but foot operation so my reason for changing to potentiometer was because my leg shakes so it was like me revving the lathe & anyway I prefer to set the speed. I & a few others that I recommended the motor to run a Pultra 10mm lathe so if you have a 6 or 8mm B & L then it will be plenty, if you have seen any of my videos you will have seen that when using a graver I run quite slow without any problems. Dell
×
×
  • Create New...