Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
22 hours ago, Zendoc said:

What tips can folks give me to work out in which direction I’ll need to turn the collet once I’ve taken the balance out of the movement?

Try removing the pallet fork and look to center the impulse jewel between the banking pins or the fork bridge. Carefully rotate the balance slightly and observe where it returns to rest and if it not centered.

If the jewel isn’t centered I think about the relationship of the stud to the rim of the balance wheel: Carefully turn the wheel to center the impulse jewel and try to observe how far the rim moves in relation to the stud. With Swiss movements sometimes the factory placed a faint small dot on the rim of the balance to indicate where to align the stud. I’ve been able to zero a few on the first try by centering the stud on the mark but it may just assist in telling you the direction yo need to turn.

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Zendoc said:

Yep, the video is very clear, but it supposes you have the movement disassembled enough to enable a very clear view of the position of the impulse pin in relation to the banking pins.  And even then, I imagine that eyeballing the out-of-centre position  would become very difficult as the beat error becomes smaller?  

I’m starting to see that trial and error might be the easiest/quickest way to work out which way to turn the collet - might just mean you need to take the balance out of the movement one more time if you get the direction wrong on the first attempt. It’s an iterative process anyway, so one more time isn’t too onerous. 

For me up to now it has always been this way. Its good to check the pin positioning before reassembly of the movement.  Its possible to get it close enough this way, within 0.5 - 1 ms.

  • Like 2
Posted
11 hours ago, VWatchie said:

would expect a higher amplitude and we can't get enough of that, can we?

I often observe improved amplitude after adjustment…

  • Like 1
Posted

I did the math meanwhile:

@Jon, I have to apologize for my harsh response!

Yes, your math does not correctly convert time to angle of a part of a swing. But funny enough neglected facts compensate each other here and the result is in the ballpark, sufficient precise to work with (in this limited  range around middle position).

@Zendoc I have no reliable and easy method in which direction to turn the collet. If a coarse error, I observe the impulse jewel as described and turn the collet the same direction the jewel is off the center. 
With small errors I am wrong every 2nd case ☹️.

The dot on the balance rim is reliable only with untouched units, but who knows? Changed staff or removed/mounted roller makes this dot worthless.

Frank

  • Like 2
Posted
18 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

Nickelsilver showed this tool, think he said is a propertiertory tool. Nice to have one ! 

There was one for sale on eBay recently for £280

1 hour ago, praezis said:

Yes, your math does not correctly convert time to angle of a part of a swing. But funny enough neglected facts compensate each other here and the result is in the ballpark, sufficient precise to work with (in this limited  range around middle position)

Thanks, it's far from precise, but it's close to give an idea how many degrees to turn the collet. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Believe the relume (not a fan) was done a long time after the damage. 
    • I can only think of some chemical reaction to reluming
    • I have a little milling attachment for my WW lathe, but very rarely use it and not for wheel and pinion cutting. For that I use a small Sixis 101 milling machine. I normally do direct dividing, but sometimes have to do an odd count and use the universal index which also fits on the Sixis.   Back in the day when I didn't have a mill, I would cut gearing on my Schaublin 102. It has a universal dividing attachment which fits the back of the spindle. Both it and the one for the Sixis are 60:1 ratio, and with the set of 4  index plates I can do almost any division. When I've had to do a strange high count prime number, I print a disc with the needed division and just place the plunger on the dot. Any position error is reduced by a factor of 60 so still plenty accurate.   The machines are a mess in the pics as I'm in the process of making a batch of barrels for a wristwatch 🙃.   This is the Sixis. The head can also be placed vertically, as can the dividing spindle.   Dividing plates. The smaller ones fit another dividing spindle.   Universal divider for the Sixis. I put it together with parts from an odd Sixis spindle that takes w20 collets, like the Schaublin 102, and a dividing attachment from a Schaublin mill.     The dividing attachment for the 102. The gear fits in place of the handwheel at the back of the headstock.   And the little milling attachment for the WW lathe. I just set it on the slide rest to illustrate the size, you can see from the dust on it it really doesn't get used much. I think only when I change bearing in the head, to kiss the collet head seat (grinding wheel still in the milling attachment).
    • I read a lot about the quality (or lack thereof) of Seiko's 4R, 6R, 8L  movements...or more specifically the lack of regulation from the factory. Especially when compared to similar priced manufactures using SW200's or ETA's. I thought I'd ask those more in the know, do the 4R's and 6R's deserve their bad reputation, is it fairly easy for someone with minimal skills (or better yet a trained watch mechanic) to dial in these movements to a more acceptable performance.    For background I spent more on a 1861 Speedy years ago, expecting that the advertised 0-15s/d  would probably perform more like 5-7s/d. In reality it's been closed to 2-4s/d. 
×
×
  • Create New...