Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Newby hobbyist here.

Working on AS2066 and facing an issue. The top cap jewel is held in place by some type of a washer with three teeth. I have seen AS2066 with typical incablocks, but this contraption ain't it. It rotates around, but there seems to be no way of yanking it out.

I cannot figure out how to remove or adjust this spring to keep the cap tightly pressed against the lower jewel.

Any help is appreciated.

image.thumb.png.69c0f1acec43a798741952905dba5bc9.png

Posted
7 hours ago, Dmitry said:

Newby hobbyist here.

Working on AS2066 and facing an issue. The top cap jewel is held in place by some type of a washer with three teeth. I have seen AS2066 with typical incablocks, but this contraption ain't it. It rotates around, but there seems to be no way of yanking it out.

I cannot figure out how to remove or adjust this spring to keep the cap tightly pressed against the lower jewel.

Any help is appreciated.

image.thumb.png.69c0f1acec43a798741952905dba5bc9.png

Pretty sure this is a swiss ruby neutro shock, your picture is not clear enough but there aren't many like this stupid design. Vibrax is another but the catalogue shows a steel cap. Ive stripped a similar one down which i think is from a citizen,  japan also used some neutro shock types. Clipping off the stud holder releases the regulator arm then you can get in with a sharp blade to prise the setting out of the cock. This is about as far as you can go with disassembly unless you want to risk bending up the spring prongs . Getting them pressed back down tight over the cap will be near impossible. I thought the setting had a seam at the bottom end that might press apart, so i gave it a go . It came apart but nevet to be reassembled, split in half and from inside there is no seam so everything goes in from the front. Personally i would break it down to the setting and flush it out best you can then push oil in from the underside with a whisker. Of course yours may not be identical, so post more pictures as you strip it down.

20240302_105347.jpg

20240302_105610.jpg

20240302_105640.jpg

20240302_105943.jpg

17093792073006442345542745089719.jpg

20240302_114421.jpg

20240302_120745.jpg

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Posted

The primary reason I unloc the setting is to check the jewels for damage.

So with the jewels in place, clean in ultrasonic machine, then if the oscilator is happy with the jewels ; ie  oscilating freely for at least 30 second with a mild blow from puffer,  call the jewels clean and undamged. 

This setting is no worse than rub-in ones, just as bad.🤠

Good luck.

  • Thanks 1
  • 10 months later...
Posted
On 3/2/2024 at 6:24 AM, Neverenoughwatches said:

Pretty sure this is a swiss ruby neutro shock, your picture is not clear enough but there aren't many like this stupid design. Vibrax is another but the catalogue shows a steel cap. Ive stripped a similar one down which i think is from a citizen,  japan also used some neutro shock types. Clipping off the stud holder releases the regulator arm then you can get in with a sharp blade to prise the setting out of the cock. This is about as far as you can go with disassembly unless you want to risk bending up the spring prongs . Getting them pressed back down tight over the cap will be near impossible. I thought the setting had a seam at the bottom end that might press apart, so i gave it a go . It came apart but nevet to be reassembled, split in half and from inside there is no seam so everything goes in from the front. Personally i would break it down to the setting and flush it out best you can then push oil in from the underside with a whisker. Of course yours may not be identical, so post more pictures as you strip it down.

20240302_105347.jpg

20240302_105610.jpg

20240302_105640.jpg

20240302_105943.jpg

17093792073006442345542745089719.jpg

20240302_114421.jpg

20240302_120745.jpg

Yep, that's the little beastie. And you saved me alot of trouble because I was going to try and dig in and figure it out. Nope. I'm gonna oil in situ and call it good. Many thanks again. 

On 3/2/2024 at 7:24 AM, Nucejoe said:

The primary reason I unloc the setting is to check the jewels for damage.

So with the jewels in place, clean in ultrasonic machine, then if the oscilator is happy with the jewels ; ie  oscilating freely for at least 30 second with a mild blow from puffer,  call the jewels clean and undamged. 

This setting is no worse than rub-in ones, just as bad.🤠

Good luck.

Neverenoughwatches brought me here and I'm glad he did.

So I had sent both of them thru my ultrasonic after I had inspected them under my scope; they looked fine. After 2nd look I'll oil thru the hole jewel and call it good, and see how the balance spins. Thanks!

Not one of the Swiss's better ideas IMHO

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello all, just disassembling to service, but I can’t figure out the working of the calendar work…it’s not operational the jumper and spring are ok, but the operation of the driving wheel has me at a loss. I can’t see a cam to drive anything. Is something damaged or missing? Help please!
    • Believe the relume (not a fan) was done a long time after the damage. 
    • I can only think of some chemical reaction to reluming
    • I have a little milling attachment for my WW lathe, but very rarely use it and not for wheel and pinion cutting. For that I use a small Sixis 101 milling machine. I normally do direct dividing, but sometimes have to do an odd count and use the universal index which also fits on the Sixis.   Back in the day when I didn't have a mill, I would cut gearing on my Schaublin 102. It has a universal dividing attachment which fits the back of the spindle. Both it and the one for the Sixis are 60:1 ratio, and with the set of 4  index plates I can do almost any division. When I've had to do a strange high count prime number, I print a disc with the needed division and just place the plunger on the dot. Any position error is reduced by a factor of 60 so still plenty accurate.   The machines are a mess in the pics as I'm in the process of making a batch of barrels for a wristwatch 🙃.   This is the Sixis. The head can also be placed vertically, as can the dividing spindle.   Dividing plates. The smaller ones fit another dividing spindle.   Universal divider for the Sixis. I put it together with parts from an odd Sixis spindle that takes w20 collets, like the Schaublin 102, and a dividing attachment from a Schaublin mill.     The dividing attachment for the 102. The gear fits in place of the handwheel at the back of the headstock.   And the little milling attachment for the WW lathe. I just set it on the slide rest to illustrate the size, you can see from the dust on it it really doesn't get used much. I think only when I change bearing in the head, to kiss the collet head seat (grinding wheel still in the milling attachment).
    • I read a lot about the quality (or lack thereof) of Seiko's 4R, 6R, 8L  movements...or more specifically the lack of regulation from the factory. Especially when compared to similar priced manufactures using SW200's or ETA's. I thought I'd ask those more in the know, do the 4R's and 6R's deserve their bad reputation, is it fairly easy for someone with minimal skills (or better yet a trained watch mechanic) to dial in these movements to a more acceptable performance.    For background I spent more on a 1861 Speedy years ago, expecting that the advertised 0-15s/d  would probably perform more like 5-7s/d. In reality it's been closed to 2-4s/d. 
×
×
  • Create New...