Jump to content

Removing crystal with retaining ring from Seiko DX


Recommended Posts

I've never seen this arrangement. Looks like the crystal seals against this steel retaining ring with a gasket, but I don't see how to remove the ring.

I tried pushing on the crystal from the outside, but it didn't budge, and it seems like a bad idea. Prying from the inside with hand levers seems like a bad idea, too.

It seems like it should just fall out, but no such luck.

Before I ruin something, does anyone know the right way to do this?

20240102163651289.thumb.png.e9546c90dd260d7fa9a4bf88fa914f70.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to the Seiko casing guide you do just push down on the crystal from the top.

I believe that someone else had the same issue fairly recently so a search may come up with something.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Marc said:

I believe that someone else had the same issue fairly recently so a search may come up with something.

I did give that a go through Google without any luck. Turns out the forum search was the better choice this time and I found the thread.

1 hour ago, Marc said:

According to the Seiko casing guide you do just push down on the crystal from the top.

That was it! It came out with a medium scary POP, but it came out safely.

20240102_180201.thumb.jpg.7a84b1d34c9c2430801861517facee8e.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So now I have to find the gaskets. I found a casing guide with the part numbers:

Caseback: FA3100B

Crown & stem: OJ0060B

Glass: 0B3005B

but I haven't been able to find specs on these. I think at least the glass gasket started out as an o-ring, which I have an assortment of. As well as stem o-rings.

Is there a place to cross reference the numbers to dimensions/shapes reliably?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Edit for anyone coming here looking for gasket part numbers for their 6106-5549:

Caseback: FA3100B: square profile, 0.6mm width, 31mm inner diameter.

Crown&stem: DJ0060B: D-shaped profile, 0.8mm thick, 0.6mm ID.

Crystal: OB3005B: O-ring profile, 0.75mm thick, 30.05mm ID.

Found it at Seikoworldtime.com! Wow what a tremendous resource.

image.thumb.png.ab697194502a77a6c9a4a5e03ad6e416.png

Edited by ManSkirtBrew
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I got the original gaskets, and I can't get the crystal gasket to fit properly.

There's a little ridge around the crystal, but it's not deep enough to hold the o-ring in place, which seems to need a little stretching to fit properly.

20240110_222103.thumb.jpg.76ed64218b09307a0c2cec563db83016.jpg

I'm dying to wear this guy, so I put the flat gasket that came out back on, and it's a perfect fit.

20240110_222223.thumb.jpg.9a1bade4d55d7eaf7ad451f23ea8ac43.jpg

 

And after an embarrassing time assembling the crystal, gasket, and retaining ring in the wrong order, It's back together and running again. What a handsome watch!

Image_20240110_2237531421093674362560263.thumb.jpg.9a9ba01e854f8c38f0d165687a1e0c74.jpg

20240110_225632.thumb.jpg.9fd690d7c6ce3a7e3adef21c0a5e153c.jpg

20240110_225636.thumb.jpg.5f09e0f581f2690cb380d7e9fd67ce07.jpg

You know what...I think I got the caseback and crystal gaskets reversed. That would make so much more sense and I'm an idiot. Back soon.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, definitely got my wires crossed and had it backwards. But that brings up a new issue.

FA3100B is supposed to sit around the ridge on the crystal, but it's too big. It doesn't even fit inside the case.

I measured the crystal, and it's 30mm. What the heck?

20240111193712408.thumb.png.95dca06ff1c3592f34843a15349ccbe7.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, ManSkirtBrew said:

Okay, definitely got my wires crossed and had it backwards

Well, maybe not. The 1978 Seiko casing guide confirms the o-ring is supposed to go under the crystal. But looking at the crystal and caseback (and the crystal gasket that came out) it really should logically be the other way around.

image.png.480f4faa87e08bde9a2098803a048d5e.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My thinking is yes it is better if you were to choose this or a tg, although the tg can do more . This way the watch is adjusted specifically to you and your routine. As an example i restored an old Smiths pin pallet watch ( typically an inaccurate movement ) around 3 months ago. Adjusted through 5 positions on a tg initially proved ok but not precise over time.  Having then re- regulated the movement after each week of wearing over a period of 6 weeks brought the timekeeping in much closer, now within 1 minute/week
    • Hi everyone, I am Michael and I am completely new to the watch making world. After buying a mechanical watch a couple of years ago and realizing that the time keeping degraded significantly recently...I started digging and got fascinated by the topic!  I disassembled the watch with the Miyota 821a...and this gave the initial spark. Right now, the movement is still disassembled...and I am trying on a different movement my cleaning and lubrication before finalizing this project 😁 I am hoping to find help when I get lost and ask maybe some stupid questions - sorry for that in advance 😉 All the best, Michael 
    • As it is your watch the answer is yes! When regulating a watch for someone else there's no way we can tell in what environment the watch is used and how often the wearer of the watch will wind it. In that situation, a timing machine is a handy tool to get close to something that likely will be acceptable. As indicated by @tomh207 and @clockboy a timing machine is a great way to quickly determine the health of the movement. If you are considering a Weishi I'd recommend the 1900 model over the 1000 model as the 1900 has a gain setting. These machines work well but aren't foolproof. If you want something more advanced I'd recommend the PCTM software from @praezis.
    • Hi guys, I am completely new to watch making and currently I am iterating on my cleaning process to get it right. My current process is a 3 step cleaning routine in an ultrasonic cleaner and drying afterwards in a food dehydrator at 45°C. 10min wash with Elma Red 1:9 at 58°C 5min rinse in distilled water 2min rinse in IPA 99% 10min drying in a food dehydrator at 45°C I have an old ETA 2842 which I use to test the process and the cleaning in general works pretty good...but I found one strange thing during one run I did yesterday. After the 10min wash cycle in Elma Red 1:9, the bright silver balance shock jewel metal housing colored black. Do you have an idea what happened here? Thanks, best regards Michael  
    • I don't know if its pushing it in too far, but because the available batteries do not have a raised contact, clear of the case?  I'm not keen on the idea of soldering to a battery, but possibly stick a small washer or similar metal spacer on with conductive paint or adhesive, plus a nylon washer around it?  
×
×
  • Create New...