Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hi,

I just finished rebuilding my watch (first one), and everything is working fine, except the watch is running very fast. Takes about 45 seconds for the second hand to go around. The watch is a Tissot ETA-2846 movement.

I replaced the whole balance cock/wheel/spring with a new one during the rebuild.

Is it likely I just need to adjust the balance spring?

I tried demagnetizing the watch but didn't make any difference.

The attached photo is the balance. Would I just move the gold colour adjuster anti-clockwise to lengthen the balance spring?

Also, what does the screw next to the +/- do? It didn't seem to make any noticable difference.

Thanks

Lee

Screenshot_2023-11-28-21-42-51-993_com.ebay.mobile-edit.jpg

Edited by lee1979
Posted

Are you sure the new balance complete has the ferquency your watch needs ? 

Aparently the new balance complete is  28800 beater whereas your watch needs a 21600 beater, 

21600÷ 28800= .75

45÷60= .75 

3 hours ago, lee1979 said:

is  it likely I just need to adjust the balance spring?

No , that wont do it. 

Rgds

4 hours ago, lee1979 said:

 what does the screw next to the +/- do? It didn't seem to make any noticable difference.

Thats your micro adjustor.

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
4 hours ago, lee1979 said:

Tissot ETA-2846

Maybe a little more detail here? The reason I ask is often times Tissot isn't exactly the same it's possibly been modified or changed so is that the number under the balance wheel engraved on the main plate? Then sometimes you get like a -2 after the caliber number and of course that will change things.

4 hours ago, lee1979 said:

I replaced the whole balance cock/wheel/spring with a new one during the rebuild.

Then out of curiosity why was that done what happened to the original one? Plus we do like pictures but pictures of the balance wheel out of the watch Are not helpful in that the problem is the balance wheel in the watch. So for instance the picture you have you definitely have problems as they hairspring isn't properly centered it looks like it's touching that would make it run fast so we need a picture the balance wheel in the watch so we can see where they hairspring is and if adjustments have to be made or not.

 

Posted

thanks @Nucejoe

That is exactly it. My mistake. I bought a complete balance for 2836 because I couldn't find one for 2846 (as per my previous thread, I damaged a chaton and bought a whole new balance as a I couldn't find the chaton on its own). I thought that most of the parts were the same across 2836 and 2846, but I guess I was wrong at least on this one.

I found these pages now, which confirms that the beats are exactly as you say, so explains the 45 seconds vs 1 minute.

https://calibercorner.com/eta-caliber-2836-2/

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&&2uswk&ETA_2846

Is the chaton in the new 2836 balance likely to be the same as in the 2846 so I could put the old balance wheel back on with the chaton from the new balance?

Thanks

Lee

Posted

Hi Lee, 

14 minutes ago, lee1979 said:

https://calibercorner.com/eta-caliber-2836-2/

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&&2uswk&ETA_2846

Is the chaton in the new 2836 balance likely to be the same as in the 2846 so I could put the old balance wheel back on with the chaton from the new balance?

Notice, Dr ranfft lists  11.5 "'  for both eta 2836 and 2846 , based on which I say yes chatons are the same for both calibers. 

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted

 Hi Lee, 

Base movement of ETA 2824 and 2836 are entirely interchangeable, and both calibers are most common of ETA's , so your next project can be either of said calibers in need of balance complete. 

Rgds

  • Thanks 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

 Hi Lee, 

Base movement of ETA 2824 and 2836 are entirely interchangeable, and both calibers are most common of ETA's , so your next project can be either of said calibers in need of balance complete. 

Rgds

Thanks, @Nucejoe.  Might wait a little while until I embark on the next one, but good idea!

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

Just a quick reply to let everyone know that I managed to get a used 2846 balance and finally finished rebuilding the watch yesterday. Seems to be running pretty perfectly at the moment. I still need to measure it properly and maybe make some minor adjustment, but it was still on the correct minute after running for a day or more.

On to the next one!

Thanks for all your help!

Lee

Edited by lee1979
  • Thanks 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes, this is on the basis of no epilam. Interestingly, the technical guide calls for using HP1300 instead of grease on a lot of stuff in the keyless works which might indicate an assumption that it had all been treated with epilam.    This, exactly I suppose . Literally trying to get a more, or less, viscous oil by mixing two different oils together. Obviously you would imagine using oils from the same 'family' would make them more compatible.    Actually, I knew this. Everyone seems to use HP1300 to substitute D5 but Moebius actually recommend their HP oils only for jewelled bearings. If it's a brass bushing D5 is best.  Interested what the outcome might be if I used 9020 on the balance/ escape wheel pivots of a typical wristwatch sized movement. The practical consequence of this would be having to service the movement again if it doesn't work but actually the real consequence is that you have bought 2ml of extremely expensive oil that you might not use again. 
    • What size is the movement and have you done the usual search with bestfit. To me it looks like something in the 10 series. The other option would be to measure the staff and try and trace it from their, or at least find an equivalent. Edit Just realised after a bit more digging the manufacturer is marked on the movement 'FREY'  
    • 1mm copper wire can be tapered to fit. Softer than brass but it does work.
    • You would think so.....but maybe not. I did just that with a 50's Oris tank. 5 years ago.....stripped and polished...it hasn't tarnished and looks exactly as it did..I wear it often. Looks like brushed gold plate. 
    • This poor watch now has a new escape wheel jewel. I got a jewel assortment and found one that fitted snugly in the setting, and whose hole was a neat fit on the escape wheel pivot, glued it to the flattened end of a 1mm drill bit and turned it on some brass with diamond lapping paste to give it a taper on one side. I used a sewing needle to gently close the setting over the jewel. It doesn't look too bad in the pic, but actually about the bottom third of the setting has nothing left holding the jewel down and I'm not sure whether it will hold. I'll have to see when I reassemble it. Before I reassemble, I thought I'd better have a look at the balance and check its poise. I put it on a pair of tweezers and found it did indeed want to always stop with the same point uppermost, swinging to and fro around that point. While I was thinking about timing washers and that I don't have the right tool to remove a timing screw, I noticed that one of the pivots didn't look straight. A closer look was called for: The right hand (upper) pivot is definitely bent. So, should I try to straighten it? It is likely to break, I suspect. Am I going to be able to buy a replacement balance staff for a watch more than 100 years old with no movement number? Seems unlikely. I have no lathe so I'm not in a position to make one myself. What are my options?
×
×
  • Create New...