Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi,

I bit the bullet and invested in several Bergeon mainspring winders (#6&7 winders L&R arbors). 

I was thinking this would cover me for the 1960s/1970s seiko and ETA calibers I’m interested in but come to find out that matching winders to barrel is more tricky than I thought. 

while the nbr 6&7 winders do fit the various barrels for the seiko calibers I have (51xx and 61xx), the arbors are way to big for the mainsprings.
 

I tried using the smaller of the two, the number 6 in the #7 winder, but that caused problems because the #6 arbor doesn’t fully cover the #7 winder (and even the #6 arbor is pretty tight).

so my question is how do you go about finding the right pairs or arbors and winders for general applications, or ultimately do you have to purchase caliber specific winders?

I’m sure I’m not the only hobbyest whose come across this problem—how do others handle this?

lastly, I know I could just purchase replacement mainsprings, but since I’m not buying in bulk and CousinsUK is the best source, repeated shipping cost alone justify the re-use of orignal mainsprings if they are in good shape (or maybe I keep telling myself that since I’m now out several hundred USD….)

 

Posted

Normally on the Swiss mainspring winders it comes is basically to pieces the barrel and the handle. Sometimes the handle might fit another barrel but that's more by accident than by deliberate design.. Oh and some of the Seiko's require a left-handed handle because they're backwards.

Then while everyone does love cousins it's amazing what kind of mainsprings you can find on eBay.

Posted

@Levine98 I feel your pain, I like working on Seiko's too, but the mainspring is always an issue. I also got a half set of Bergeon winders (left and right) and the number 6 seems to work OK for the 7009, 6309 and 7S26/36 that I tend to work on....BUT.... the reverse bridal on the Seiko springs is difficult to use with the winders. So today I hand wind Seiko springs as I junk far fewer perfectly serviceable springs that way. I even reached out to Mike on My Retro Watches who does a lot of Seikos on his youtube channel and he replied with the same issues and he too hand winds Seiko springs. I don't have an issue with other brands using the winders (except when I do something stupid) but for some reason they don't like Seikos.

Posted
9 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

Normally on the Swiss mainspring winders it comes is basically to pieces the barrel and the handle. Sometimes the handle might fit another barrel but that's more by accident than by deliberate design.. Oh and some of the Seiko's require a left-handed handle because they're backwards.

Then while everyone does love cousins it's amazing what kind of mainsprings you can find on eBay.

Yes, thanks but I know this, that is the reason for my question. Regarding eBay, I'm a heavy user, however when it comes to small consumable items like mainsprings the prices tend to be outragous, even when compared to CousinsUK + shipping.

For example, Seiko mainsprings run $19.95 or more plus shipping on eBay. I can get them on CousinUK for less. If I use the ETA2892 mainspring (which I understand to be an equivalent to the GX/Seiko recommendation), the cost is even lower.

What I was really trying to learn was what alternative methods are folks using when they encounter this situation, ie, correct barrel diameter winder but completely wrong arbor diameter.

 

7 hours ago, Waggy said:

@Levine98 I feel your pain, I like working on Seiko's too, but the mainspring is always an issue. I also got a half set of Bergeon winders (left and right) and the number 6 seems to work OK for the 7009, 6309 and 7S26/36 that I tend to work on....BUT.... the reverse bridal on the Seiko springs is difficult to use with the winders. So today I hand wind Seiko springs as I junk far fewer perfectly serviceable springs that way. I even reached out to Mike on My Retro Watches who does a lot of Seikos on his youtube channel and he replied with the same issues and he too hand winds Seiko springs. I don't have an issue with other brands using the winders (except when I do something stupid) but for some reason they don't like Seikos.

Thanks, @Waggy, that is very helpful (to know I'm not the only one beating my head on this, that even more experienced members have encountered the same challenge).

I've hand wind pocket watch mainsprings before, but never smaller wristwatch ones. Given the reverse bridle, I suspect it takes a bit of practice?

Posted
20 minutes ago, Levine98 said:

I'm a heavy user, however when it comes to small consumable items like mainsprings the prices tend to be outragous, even when compared to CousinsUK + shipping.

Interesting? I was looking at the last two mainsprings I bought $10 each and by the time you add in shipping and tax is up to $28 for two springs let's make that $30 that makes them $15 each shipping. So Cousens is cheaper than that I will remember that the next time I need some mainsprings Nice to know that I'm getting ripped off on eBay I thought that was a bargain price.

  • Like 2
Posted
17 minutes ago, Levine98 said:

Given the reverse bridle, I suspect it takes a bit of practice?

Yes a little practice, but your odds of success are many times greater than using the winders, at least in my experience on Seiko springs. For all other springs where possible I use the winders with good success.

Also, not sure if this makes a difference, but on the Seiko barrels the cap tends to sit on on the outer diameter of the barrel slightly below the lip of the barrel body, this means that the spring is completely flush whit the top of the barrel. on a swiss barrel the cap fits inside the barrel body on top of the spring, meaning that the spring sits below the top of the barrel when winding it. I have had several occasions where spring has burst out of the barrel (usually when I am trying to wiggle out the winding arbor from the barrel winder), and I suspect that this is because the barrels on Seiko's have no room for error, unlike the swiss versions which give you a small amount of wiggle room before the spring would be free of the barrel, perhaps the winders are not precise enough to work with a spring which is completely flush and need that little bit of wiggle room? At least if you are hand winding you can see and adjust if it looks/feels like the spring is starting to peek over the top of the barrel?

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, JohnR725 said:

Interesting? I was looking at the last two mainsprings I bought $10 each and by the time you add in shipping and tax is up to $28 for two springs let's make that $30 that makes them $15 each shipping. So Cousens is cheaper than that I will remember that the next time I need some mainsprings Nice to know that I'm getting ripped off on eBay I thought that was a bargain price.

Even better, CousinUK shipping tends to be quicker (counter-intuitive I know).

On average I receive my CousinsUK shipment within 5 business days OR LESS!

My experience with eBay is completely random, depending on the seller. Some are really good about posting the day after sale, most others are not. When you factor in that most eBay sellers (myself included) now use USPS Ground Advantage, that adds time over first class mail since Ground Advantage is simply the old Parcel Post service rebranded with insurance and tracking built in. So on average my eBay orders tend to run 5-7 business days or longer.

4 minutes ago, Waggy said:

Yes a little practice, but your odds of success are many times greater than using the winders, at least in my experience on Seiko springs. For all other springs where possible I use the winders with good success.

Also, not sure if this makes a difference, but on the Seiko barrels the cap tends to sit on on the outer diameter of the barrel slightly below the lip of the barrel body, this means that the spring is completely flush whit the top of the barrel. on a swiss barrel the cap fits inside the barrel body on top of the spring, meaning that the spring sits below the top of the barrel when winding it. I have had several occasions where spring has burst out of the barrel (usually when I am trying to wiggle out the winding arbor from the barrel winder), and I suspect that this is because the barrels on Seiko's have no room for error, unlike the swiss versions which give you a small amount of wiggle room before the spring would be free of the barrel, perhaps the winders are not precise enough to work with a spring which is completely flush and need that little bit of wiggle room? At least if you are hand winding you can see and adjust if it looks/feels like the spring is starting to peek over the top of the barrel?

I've got a salvage 6119 on the way from eBay and plan on using the mainspring if I can. So I'm going to give this method a try before ordering replacements from CousinUK--very helpful and thanks again.

Posted (edited)
On 10/17/2023 at 5:34 PM, Levine98 said:

Hi,

I bit the bullet and invested in several Bergeon mainspring winders (#6&7 winders L&R arbors). 

I was thinking this would cover me for the 1960s/1970s seiko and ETA calibers I’m interested in but come to find out that matching winders to barrel is more tricky than I thought. 

while the nbr 6&7 winders do fit the various barrels for the seiko calibers I have (51xx and 61xx), the arbors are way to big for the mainsprings.
 

I tried using the smaller of the two, the number 6 in the #7 winder, but that caused problems because the #6 arbor doesn’t fully cover the #7 winder (and even the #6 arbor is pretty tight).

so my question is how do you go about finding the right pairs or arbors and winders for general applications, or ultimately do you have to purchase caliber specific winders?

I’m sure I’m not the only hobbyest whose come across this problem—how do others handle this?

lastly, I know I could just purchase replacement mainsprings, but since I’m not buying in bulk and CousinsUK is the best source, repeated shipping cost alone justify the re-use of orignal mainsprings if they are in good shape (or maybe I keep telling myself that since I’m now out several hundred USD….)

 

I tried a few different things with mainspring winders to avoid forking out the money for a Bergeon set.  3D printed winders, 3D printed winder barrels with a couple of Bergeon arbors, and a cheap Chinese set.  Each had their issues.  What I settled on was a modified Chinese set of winders with a couple of Bergeon winders.  By modified, I mean that I drilled out arbor holes on some of the winders to be able to accept larger arbors.  This made the set more generic than caliber specific.

With the Bergeon #6 and #8 arbors factored in, I have a variety of arbor sizes from 1.5mm to 3.5mm.  So, it is easier to find a suitable combo of arbor and winder for a given mainspring.  This has worked for me so far, but haven't yet tried it with a Seiko mainspring.  When I need a right hand arbor and only have a left hand (or vice versa), I have some brass washers that I have drilled out for different diameters to press the mainspring into as an intermediary.

20230722_232615.jpg

Edited by gpraceman
  • Like 1
Posted

#7 arbor is thicker than than the 61/63xx mainspring loop but you can force it in without permanent damage. The problem is pulling the arbor out once the spring is wound inside the winder. I use an exacto knife to keep the spring inside while pulling the arbor out. #6 and Seiko 7xxx is better fit but there's a bigger gap between winder and barrel wall so you have to be careful while pushing the spring in the barrel.

Posted (edited)
53 minutes ago, Malocchio said:

The problem is pulling the arbor out once the spring is wound inside the winder.

Safety safety! 🫣

I always wear a pair of glasses when messing with mainsprings, you never know when you will have a lapse in concentration and the spring rips loose. Never had an occasion where I've had a close call, but I can imagine the outcome if one did head that direction, sharp metal traveling at Mach 3!

You need to be careful if the winding arbor is too large, as this can open up the inner loop of the spring and then your barrel arbor wont catch(learned this the hard way), bending the spring back into shape is a bad idea as the steel is hardened and will break before it returns to shape (also learned the hard way - much swearing from my workshop). I am sure @Malocchio is correct in this instance and its tight but not too tight, so this is just a heads up for future experience.

Here is a YouTube showing how to do this properly, but never done it myself.... yet

 

Edited by Waggy
Posted

Not sure about other Seiko movements since I have only worked on the 6309 movements. If you order the GR2534X from Cosine UK which is what there web site call for you will find the inner coil to be too big. What you need is the GR25341X or ETA2892A2.  I have since fixed 3 6309 movements using the GR25341X without any problems. This a lot cheaper than finding a Mainspring winder that will work.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, wudce said:

Not sure about other Seiko movements since I have only worked on the 6309 movements. If you order the GR2534X from Cosine UK which is what there web site call for you will find the inner coil to be too big. What you need is the GR25341X or ETA2892A2.  I have since fixed 3 6309 movements using the GR25341X without any problems. This a lot cheaper than finding a Mainspring winder that will work.

That is what I ended up doing 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • After another long hiatus (while waiting for truing calipers to arrive), I’ve made some more progress. TRUING IN THE FLAT I was able to use the calipers I purchased to true the wheel in the flat. There’s still a very slight eccentricity in the round, but I’m going to leave it as is. It doesn’t wobble any more and I’m happy with that. Thanks for the tool recommendation @mbwatch. It worked well, though I must say it takes a delicate touch to get the balance between the calipers. Also, my calipers effectively have four different variations based on the orientation of the arms (2 sides, 2 orientations each). Some are more tapered than others, though to what end, I can’t quite tell. My first thought was that flipping them over yields arms that can be used for poising. They are K&D horizontal calipers, btw. OSCILLATION TEST @nevenbekriev @JohnR725 After truing the wheel in the flat, I carefully remounted the hairspring and did your oscillation test. Balance wheel mounted to balance cock, no pallet fork, rotate balance wheel 180 degrees, let it go, and time+count the oscillations. Results as follows for dial down orientation: Duration: 1m 15sec (to full stop) # of oscillations: About 125, though the amplitude of the oscillations decreased significantly, as one might expect I should redo the test in at least two other orientations…Forgot to do that. 🙂  In general, it’s safe to say this watch has a pretty low amplitude, likely for a variety of reasons. I haven’t oiled the balance jewels FWIW…I should probably do that, but I really don’t want to keep disassembling and reassembling the balance. Is it possible to oil those jewels (top and bottom) by just removing the capstones and putting in a tiny amount of oil, with balance in place? I can see how having the pivot in the jewel hole could change how capillary action works, and thus might pull more oil in than desired. However, those capillary forces will be in effect anyway once the balance is inserted. PRACTICE MOVEMENTS @JohnR725 I agree with your sentiment about using practice movements wholeheartedly, and I’ve done that to some degree. The watch I’m currently repairing is for a friend, and she was willing to have me treat it as a “learn-by-doing experience.” With that said,, I probably should have purchased a few more “beaters” before getting to something where I don’t want to muck things up. I’ve still got a couple of those on the bench that I used as donors, and I’ll try to rehabilitate them.
    • Hi, this is the first place I found when looking for advice so I hope someone could advise me.  Im completely new to touching watches but I’ve always wondered how they work.  I’ve bought a cheap movement, an ETA replica to take apart and rebuild.  Im thinking I’ll need some screwdrivers, tweezers, movement holder and a loop? My goal is just to have a go first and see if I enjoy it enough before buying more tools.  Do I buy cheap tools for now and get better quality tools later if I enjoy it like I think I will? or will the cheap tools be a pain and take some of the fun out of it?  With quality tools being relatively expensive I’m unsure what to buy.    Any advice would be greatly appreciated!
    • Yeah I have seen 44-56 documented for Elgin 18 size elsewhere. I have the style of gauge that's like a set of feeler gauges and I never noticed before today it is faintly stamped "Elgin". Pictured is the way I have been measuring. I am going to go to a larger jewel than the 42 that had been in there. I recently won an auction on a big set of Fitrite jewels all in the little bottles, to discover that the what's actually in the bottles bears no relation to the chart of sizes printed on the box. In most cases it seems to be all mixed so in fact I have about 24 little bottles and thousands of assorted jewels of all diameters and lengths, which is better than nothing. But since I don't have a micrometer with a table, measuring for the exact diameter will be a big job. Instead I will test a lot of them in the fork slot the same way I measure with the gauge. But this is still the next thing. I have to get the escapement to unlock first.
    • it would be nice to have the exact model of the watch the or a picture so we can see exactly what you're talking about. this is because the definition of Swiss watch could be a variety of things and it be helpful if we could see exactly the watch your dealing with then in professional watch repair at least some professionals they do pre-cleaned watches. In other words the hands and dial come off and the entire movement assembled goes through a cleaning machine sometimes I think a shorter bath perhaps so everything is nice and clean for disassembly makes it easier to look for problems. Then other professionals don't like pre-cleaning because it basically obliterates the scene of the crime. Especially when dealing with vintage watches where you're looking for metal filings and problems that may visually go away with cleaning. Then usually super sticky lubrication isn't really a problem for disassembly and typically shouldn't be a problem on a pallet fork bridge because there shouldn't be any lubrication on the bridge at all as you typically do not oil the pallet fork pivots.  
    • A few things you should find out before you can mske a decision of what to do. As Richard said, what is the crown and all of the crown components made of . Then also the stem .  The crown looks to have a steel washer that retains a gasket. So be careful with what chemicals you use to dissolve any stem adhesives or the use of heat. You might swell or melt the gasket unless you are prepared to change that also . The steel washer maybe reactive to alum. Something I've just used to dissolve a broken screw from a plate. First drilled out the centre of the screw with a 0.5mm carbide . Dipped only the section that held the broken screw in Rustins rust remover. This is 40 % phosphoric acid. 3 days and the screw remains were completely dissolved, no trace of steel in the brass threads. A black puddle left in the solution.
×
×
  • Create New...