Jump to content

Hamilton 770 Movement Restore


Recommended Posts

I have my grandfathers old Hamilton 770 that I would like to restore.  It runs, a little rough, so it needs a good cleaning and oiling.  I will likely also look for a parts movement just in case.

In trying to get all my ducks in a row though, one of the things I started to look into is getting a replacement mainspring lined up (not looking to buy it just yet, but know that I can get one if needed and what to order).  I took a look at the GR Database, but I don't see an entry for 770.  Did Hamilton use someone else's movement back in the 1950's and place it in there and I should be looking for something else?

Here is a picture of the face and movement side of the watch. 

IMG_0642.jpeg

IMG_0644.jpeg

Edited by kd8tzc
.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are usually listed on Ranfft, but not in this case. Nothing listed in Bestfit, or on Cousins either.

You might just have to measure the existing spring - but it might be OK anyway. I used to replace most mainsprings, but now rarely do unless I really have to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry it doesn't give the mainspring information, I was just showing that the Hamilton 770 exists.  Unless anyone knows the spring size, you'll have to measure it.

9 minutes ago, mikepilk said:

They are usually listed on Ranfft, but not in this case. Nothing listed in Bestfit, or on Cousins either.

You might just have to measure the existing spring - but it might be OK anyway. I used to replace most mainsprings, but now rarely do unless I really have to.

Haha, we must of been typing at the same time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great... another T end... how am I so lucky.  Well, I forget the amplitude that it was showing on the timegrapher, but I do recall it was low (sorry, don't have the actual numbers but will test before I start).  Maybe I will clean it all up and see what happens.

@mikepilkhow did you get that to come up?  For the life of me, I can't figure out the search feature on JB's site.  I go to the Parts Watch Database, but I can't get anything to ever come back.  I must not understand what it is looking for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Update: I posted over on NAWCC and it looks like I melted the fine coil wires where they come into the solder lugs. After dropping the heat way down on my iron and being absurdly careful, I have a humming fork!
    • Hell0 @nevenbekriev. Thank you for your advice. I have removed the old setting using my staking set--I will keep the KIF spring, since it is still good.  I am awaiting the replacement setting, and will update when I do that. In the mean time, I looked at the escape wheel and it looks ok. What do you think?    
    • Aloha All, I recently bought this Seitz tool on eBay, but it is missing some pushers reamers.  I ended up ordering new parts for those that were missing before I received the actual Seitz tool (bad idea).   Upon inspecting the pushers/bits, I noticed 23 of the 56 provided with the set had no numbers. Further inspection revealed a huge difference in the quality of those unnumbered.  Do all Seitz pushers/bits have a number on them?  I'm pretty sure that 33 of the 56 I received are cheap Chinese knockoffs.  The worst part is that I ordered $80 of parts to replace the missing pushers/bits, and now I'm looking to return the tool. I'm not crazy, right? If these are Seitz parts, they should all be numbered, correct? The first two pictures are the Seitz (numbered), and the other pictures are the suspect parts.  Will I even be able to get a refund?  Thanks, Frank     
    • It was £10 + min fee, total £16, could not leave it there. Its a Stanton A.D.2. http://stanton-instruments.co.uk/
    • Chief- The picture below shows the three parts from the dial side that are most useful to "fingerprint" a movement in conjunction with the diameter of the movement.  That's why forum participants are always asking for dial side photos in posts asking for identification.  As far as the setting lever screw, it actually sits loose in the main plate. The threads engage the setting lever below, and the elongated stem above the shoulder sticks through a hole in one of the bridge plates so that it's held captive if unscrewed all the way.  So you may be fine as far as that goes. 
×
×
  • Create New...