Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello, I do basic DIY maintenance on my modest collection of watches and would greatly appreciate any help available in relation to an issue I have in removing a faulty movement.

The movement is a Ronda 515 and the watch is a Hindenburg Zeppelin LZ129 7046-4.

The case for this watch appears to be a single block of stainless steel into which the movement has been inserted. I cannot find a way to remove the dial face in order to detach the hands and replace the movement.

In the attached image, the 4 screw holes around the edge are for the cover screws. There are 2 further screws at 12 and 6 inside the case, which I have removed, but whose function I cannot determine. There are 2 small steel stubs next to this screw holes.

The only way that I can see that the dial is inserted is that the assembly behind the cover also screws out, but there is nowhere to obtain grip to apply anti-clockwise pressure, and even under a magnifying class, I can't see that the interior assembly is separate from the outer case.

Thanks in advance.

 

IMG20230118111201.jpg

Posted

Hi Gary. Can you post some pictures of the front of the watch and the side view both sides. There is the distinct possibility that it comes out through the front once the bezel and crystal are removed thats if the bezel is snap on, that’s why pictures are use full. Cheers.

Posted

I found a video this watch, as well as a good review video of an automatic version that appears to use the same case. It looks like a crystal lift would allow you to remove the acrylic crystal and get to the dial.

 

 

I was attempting to repair a friends quartz fashion watch with a dead movement and came across this same issue, except the crystal was flat mineral glass and fitted so snug there was no chance of getting the lift on it. It was truly a throwaway item.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Believe the relume (not a fan) was done a long time after the damage. 
    • I can only think of some chemical reaction to reluming
    • I have a little milling attachment for my WW lathe, but very rarely use it and not for wheel and pinion cutting. For that I use a small Sixis 101 milling machine. I normally do direct dividing, but sometimes have to do an odd count and use the universal index which also fits on the Sixis.   Back in the day when I didn't have a mill, I would cut gearing on my Schaublin 102. It has a universal dividing attachment which fits the back of the spindle. Both it and the one for the Sixis are 60:1 ratio, and with the set of 4  index plates I can do almost any division. When I've had to do a strange high count prime number, I print a disc with the needed division and just place the plunger on the dot. Any position error is reduced by a factor of 60 so still plenty accurate.   The machines are a mess in the pics as I'm in the process of making a batch of barrels for a wristwatch 🙃.   This is the Sixis. The head can also be placed vertically, as can the dividing spindle.   Dividing plates. The smaller ones fit another dividing spindle.   Universal divider for the Sixis. I put it together with parts from an odd Sixis spindle that takes w20 collets, like the Schaublin 102, and a dividing attachment from a Schaublin mill.     The dividing attachment for the 102. The gear fits in place of the handwheel at the back of the headstock.   And the little milling attachment for the WW lathe. I just set it on the slide rest to illustrate the size, you can see from the dust on it it really doesn't get used much. I think only when I change bearing in the head, to kiss the collet head seat (grinding wheel still in the milling attachment).
    • I read a lot about the quality (or lack thereof) of Seiko's 4R, 6R, 8L  movements...or more specifically the lack of regulation from the factory. Especially when compared to similar priced manufactures using SW200's or ETA's. I thought I'd ask those more in the know, do the 4R's and 6R's deserve their bad reputation, is it fairly easy for someone with minimal skills (or better yet a trained watch mechanic) to dial in these movements to a more acceptable performance.    For background I spent more on a 1861 Speedy years ago, expecting that the advertised 0-15s/d  would probably perform more like 5-7s/d. In reality it's been closed to 2-4s/d. 
×
×
  • Create New...