Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, HectorLooi said:

SG$ 2.06  39%OFF | 360pcs 6mm-23mm Watch Band Link Cotter Pin Stainless Steel Watch Bracelet Strap Link Pins Cotter Bar Assortment Watch Repair Acc
https://a.aliexpress.com/_mqVcQB0

Try AliExpress. 

Hey, thank you for putting in the effort to try and help me.

I did see this listing in Aliexpress before, however I am kind of scared that the pins will not fit my watch. The reason being is that the open end of the pins on the Aliexpress listing, just seem too big to me and I know it's written that their diameter is 0.9mm but they seem quite bulkier in the photos. I don't know whether that is because of the zoom or the camera they used.

I am a complete newbie in watch repair, I would really really appreciate your opinion on this.

I also have been offered to purchase the exact same pins from here:

https://www.cousinsuk.com/product/0090mm-split-pins-by-size?code=P7890P

 

One more thing that concerns me too, is if 0.9mm will do the job, what if my actual size is 1.0mm, will that matter?

 

Posted
9 hours ago, tomh207 said:

They should look bigger, the old ones over time the head deforms and starts to fall out of the bracelet.

 

Tom

Thank you a lot for your help!

 

Posted
12 hours ago, whph4evr said:

if 0.9mm will do the job, what if my actual size is 1.0mm, will that matter?

You really need a more accurate way to measure the diameter. If the size you need is 1.0mm, then a 0.9mm pin will not do. Get your hands on a cheap set of calipers or a micrometer.

  • Like 1
Posted
37 minutes ago, Klassiker said:

You really need a more accurate way to measure the diameter. If the size you need is 1.0mm, then a 0.9mm pin will not do. Get your hands on a cheap set of calipers or a micrometer.

This difference will make a difference.  The effort to measure exactly is worth it as a link fail may cost you the watch. 

  • Like 2
Posted
25 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

This difference will make a difference.  The effort to measure exactly is worth it as a link fail may cost you the watch. 

Indeed, have had to do a fair amount of bracelet and case cleanup when an old pin has failed and the watch hit the deck. When I come across pins like these I replace all of them in the bracelet now, too much chance of another one failing.

 

Tom

14 hours ago, whph4evr said:

 

One more thing that concerns me too, is if 0.9mm will do the job, what if my actual size is 1.0mm, will that matter?

 

@whph4evri dug this out to help you with measuring to ensure you get the correct ones

Tom

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello all, just disassembling to service, but I can’t figure out the working of the calendar work…it’s not operational the jumper and spring are ok, but the operation of the driving wheel has me at a loss. I can’t see a cam to drive anything. Is something damaged or missing? Help please!
    • Believe the relume (not a fan) was done a long time after the damage. 
    • I can only think of some chemical reaction to reluming
    • I have a little milling attachment for my WW lathe, but very rarely use it and not for wheel and pinion cutting. For that I use a small Sixis 101 milling machine. I normally do direct dividing, but sometimes have to do an odd count and use the universal index which also fits on the Sixis.   Back in the day when I didn't have a mill, I would cut gearing on my Schaublin 102. It has a universal dividing attachment which fits the back of the spindle. Both it and the one for the Sixis are 60:1 ratio, and with the set of 4  index plates I can do almost any division. When I've had to do a strange high count prime number, I print a disc with the needed division and just place the plunger on the dot. Any position error is reduced by a factor of 60 so still plenty accurate.   The machines are a mess in the pics as I'm in the process of making a batch of barrels for a wristwatch 🙃.   This is the Sixis. The head can also be placed vertically, as can the dividing spindle.   Dividing plates. The smaller ones fit another dividing spindle.   Universal divider for the Sixis. I put it together with parts from an odd Sixis spindle that takes w20 collets, like the Schaublin 102, and a dividing attachment from a Schaublin mill.     The dividing attachment for the 102. The gear fits in place of the handwheel at the back of the headstock.   And the little milling attachment for the WW lathe. I just set it on the slide rest to illustrate the size, you can see from the dust on it it really doesn't get used much. I think only when I change bearing in the head, to kiss the collet head seat (grinding wheel still in the milling attachment).
    • I read a lot about the quality (or lack thereof) of Seiko's 4R, 6R, 8L  movements...or more specifically the lack of regulation from the factory. Especially when compared to similar priced manufactures using SW200's or ETA's. I thought I'd ask those more in the know, do the 4R's and 6R's deserve their bad reputation, is it fairly easy for someone with minimal skills (or better yet a trained watch mechanic) to dial in these movements to a more acceptable performance.    For background I spent more on a 1861 Speedy years ago, expecting that the advertised 0-15s/d  would probably perform more like 5-7s/d. In reality it's been closed to 2-4s/d. 
×
×
  • Create New...