Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi all,

Here is another project watch of mine, this is the third watch I've worked on so far. It was not in terrible condition when I got it to begin with. This is the first time I have sanded a crystal down and then back up again. There are still micro scratches but I find once I've put back onto the watch I don't notice them.

This is a 1-jewel, pin pallet escapement. The Xtensa, I assume, refers to the shock protection on the balance. It was extremely frustrating to take apart/oil put back together the shock protection. The cap stone was not captured in the normal manner - it rather kind of floated on top of a donut shaped plate that held the 'hole jewel' that is not actually a jewel, under the spring. I was trying to be extremely careful of not breaking the spring or losing anything as I didn't want to spend on a donor movement. After at least a couple hours combined for both sides I managed to get them together at least. I would seriously consider staying away from working on a watch with this shock setting in the future, unless the price was right and I liked the look.🙂

image.png.e6f7eddb2186f57b39cddec10fba8c39.png

Even though this is not so fancy on the inside with only 1 jewel, I understand there were tons of these pin pallet movements made and I enjoy the look, so hope it will last for many more years. I am happy to continue buying nice looking watches like this for very reasonable prices for my own enjoyment.

The movement photo is before cleaning.

Have a good night all.

 

Medana1.jpg

Medana2.jpg

Medana3.jpg

Medana4.jpg

MedanaMvmt.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted
7 hours ago, Charette said:

Hi all,

Here is another project watch of mine, this is the third watch I've worked on so far. It was not in terrible condition when I got it to begin with. This is the first time I have sanded a crystal down and then back up again. There are still micro scratches but I find once I've put back onto the watch I don't notice them.

This is a 1-jewel, pin pallet escapement. The Xtensa, I assume, refers to the shock protection on the balance. It was extremely frustrating to take apart/oil put back together the shock protection. The cap stone was not captured in the normal manner - it rather kind of floated on top of a donut shaped plate that held the 'hole jewel' that is not actually a jewel, under the spring. I was trying to be extremely careful of not breaking the spring or losing anything as I didn't want to spend on a donor movement. After at least a couple hours combined for both sides I managed to get them together at least. I would seriously consider staying away from working on a watch with this shock setting in the future, unless the price was right and I liked the look.🙂

image.png.e6f7eddb2186f57b39cddec10fba8c39.png

Even though this is not so fancy on the inside with only 1 jewel, I understand there were tons of these pin pallet movements made and I enjoy the look, so hope it will last for many more years. I am happy to continue buying nice looking watches like this for very reasonable prices for my own enjoyment.

The movement photo is before cleaning.

Have a good night all.

 

Medana1.jpg

Medana2.jpg

Medana3.jpg

Medana4.jpg

MedanaMvmt.jpg

Medana did make some decent watches in their time, movements by MST were of good quality.  One Jewel ?   2 cap jewels over 2 holed, by my calculations last time i checked added up to 4. Strange ? 

1 minute ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

This is the first time I have sanded a crystal down and then back up again. There are still micro scratches but I find once I've put back onto the watch I don't notice them.

Solvol auto polish makes a good fine scratch remover after reducing wet and dry grades to around 3000. Also 0.5 micron diamond paste i have heard suggested but have not tried this yet.

8 hours ago, Charette said:

Hi all,

Here is another project watch of mine, this is the third watch I've worked on so far. It was not in terrible condition when I got it to begin with. This is the first time I have sanded a crystal down and then back up again. There are still micro scratches but I find once I've put back onto the watch I don't notice them.

This is a 1-jewel, pin pallet escapement. The Xtensa, I assume, refers to the shock protection on the balance. It was extremely frustrating to take apart/oil put back together the shock protection. The cap stone was not captured in the normal manner - it rather kind of floated on top of a donut shaped plate that held the 'hole jewel' that is not actually a jewel, under the spring. I was trying to be extremely careful of not breaking the spring or losing anything as I didn't want to spend on a donor movement. After at least a couple hours combined for both sides I managed to get them together at least. I would seriously consider staying away from working on a watch with this shock setting in the future, unless the price was right and I liked the look.🙂

image.png.e6f7eddb2186f57b39cddec10fba8c39.png

Even though this is not so fancy on the inside with only 1 jewel, I understand there were tons of these pin pallet movements made and I enjoy the look, so hope it will last for many more years. I am happy to continue buying nice looking watches like this for very reasonable prices for my own enjoyment.

The movement photo is before cleaning.

Have a good night all.

 

Medana1.jpg

Medana2.jpg

Medana3.jpg

Medana4.jpg

MedanaMvmt.jpg

MST 434, also used in the Roamer brand, the few examples i found also strangely enough marked as 1 jewel. A basic watch would have 5,  these situated within the balance . 4 to accommodate the staff pivots and 1 attached to the roller also known as the impulse jewel. Strange that this is marked as only 1 jewel . Other movements in the 430s caliber are fully jewelled and labelled accurately. I thought makers loved to state as many jewels as possible.  Any thoughts anyone ? John ?

MedanaMvmt.thumb.jpg.34586e963a93af7d43d7cbe428a0d70e.jpg

Posted

As far as the last question, isn't the visible cap jewel the only one you will expect to find on these 1-jewel movements, with everything else consisting of metal bushings and pins? The balance "jeweling" is not symmetrical.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
7 hours ago, Geotex said:

As far as the last question, isn't the visible cap jewel the only one you will expect to find on these 1-jewel movements, with everything else consisting of metal bushings and pins? The balance "jeweling" is not symmetrical.

I thought the OP mentioned doing both sides. So is that just 1 cap jewel on top of the balance ?Thanks for the explanation 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

I thought the OP mentioned doing both sides. So is that just 1 cap jewel on top of the balance ?Thanks for the explanation 

There was a cap jewel on both sides. Maybe just some weird counting convention (jewels on one item).

Posted

Nice looking watch.  Odd that it's got so few jewels.

I've never bought a movement with less than 15 jewels, and plenty of those have caused me trouble - so good luck with that !

 

  • Haha 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am puzzled by something a snipped out something from your image and what exactly disassemble tell us? my confusion is the symbol for FHF looks like image I have below year symbol as a star and righted this instant are not finding what that means? I suppose we could use the fingerprint system to verify it really is what it claimed to be. Size itself is really interesting there's almost no watches in that particular size. Then were missing details in the photograph above like diameter of movements to verify it really is the size and are missing the setting components.   went to the bestfit book looking at the symbols didn't see it. Look at the link below I did find it back to the bestfit book and yes it really is there https://reference.grail-watch.com/documents/history-of-ebauches-sa/ then bestfit book says lists the size as 10 1/2. one of the problems with vintage watches is finding parts yes a donor watch would be good.
    • Actually, this could be the issue. Drag from the module could be overcoming the cannon pinion. It was definitely not at the point that the driving wheel was loose on the cannon pinion, it took a little bit of effort to rotate it when applying the grease. Maybe I need to look again at applying oil to the pivots.    Yeah, it's very annoying. I don't want to give up on it, so back on with it over again until I catch a break. 
    • The sping is not pushing directly on the cap, but is pushing against the spindle. So, even if the usual black cap is replaced with the micrometer cap, the spindle is still pushed up.
    • But he tells that the micrometer cap doesn't screw into the spindle. How can the spring push the spindle up if there's nothing to grip? There is a screw visible on top of the micrometer cap so should it be able to screw into the spindle? I'm feeling really dumb now. Does anyone manufacture that cap as an aftermarket item? Might be worth investing. Ok so the spindle is different, now I get it.
    • I suppose? If it worked before and it doesn't work now I guess the question would be why does it not work now? That would come back to if you did not have the chronograph module on will it work or is the chronograph module sucking too much power out of the watch basically 99 usually when they go bad you can hold on the tube part and usually just spin the wheel because it has zero holding at all so usually when they go bad they go bad very bad. You should build hotel when you set the watch as to whether it seems to have any friction or not. I'm just wondering if the chronograph module is the problem.
×
×
  • Create New...