Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I’m interested in all the tools and techniques involved in this venture, but as a hobbyist I don’t think a full Luthy tool is in my future. I did find a lower-tech tool made by Swartchild that allows you to suspend the balance and hairspring on a transparent plate, under which you can place a watch that has the correct BPH so that its balance is visible and you can use that as a reference. I realized that I could just as easily suspend the hairspring on an iPhone screen, if I could find a video or a simulation to run as a reference. On the amazing web page by Bartosz Ciechanowski dedicated to the engineering and physics of the mechanical watch, there is a balance oscillation simulation that worked well. Here's a link:

https://ciechanow.ski/mechanical-watch/

I grabbed an unknown spare balance out of the parts box, suspended it from a pinch point a bit away from the pre-placed stud, and by adjusting the parameters of the simulation it turned out to have a periodicity of close to 0.4 seconds, which would make it an 18,000 BPH balance. I then adjusted the pinch point until the balance was matched to that specific rate in the simulation (see video). The rate of oscillation in the simulation can be changed to provide other BPH rates, so it could be useful if this would work.

My question is regarding the level of absolute precision required to place the stud, because the timing of a web-based simulation like this may not be exactly on the nose. The placement is certainly important to allow a full range of regulation, but knowing that the regulator will be used for the ultimate fine tuning, is a setup like this likely to be accurate enough to set a new hairspring into the functional zone?

Video of this setup:

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/WH58LR0AL_4

  • Like 1
Posted

You can certainly do it like that! You can even do it with a stopwatch just counting the beats of a suspended (but supported on lower pivot) balance, I've used that technique for odd beats like 20,222 or 19,444. Though in my case I have a Luthy tool, which makes it handy to set the balance in motion and adjust the length of the spring. With a flat hairspring you would generally stud it with a bit of extra stickout in case you need to let some out when it's in the actual watch. With an overcoil you really have to get it bang-on when vibrating as lengthening or shortening might mean the overcoil gets thrown off.

 

In any case you want your balance to stay synced with the reference balance (or video) for a good minute or you will be playing around a lot in the watch.

  • Like 1
Posted

Thanks for the info! I'll go ahead and give it a try with an actual balance needing a new hairspring. Here is the vibrating setup without the phone:

 

hrspng.jpg

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Righty ho, I re-serviced the chrono module and got a reasonable result with minimal loss of amplitude when not running the chrono and about 30 degrees loss when running. Great. The problem is now that the chrono (and movement) stops running after about a minute or so, a tap on the watch starts it running again. No issues with the movement running when the chrono is stopped. Going to service it yet again, obviously some residual issues with friction in the chrono module (Very frustrating - I wish there was some way of testing it as I go!) I also seem to have a problem with the cannon pinion where the movement is running continuously (with the chrono stopped) but it's losing significant time / stopping. This is one of those two piece ETA style with a driving wheel pressed over the cannon pinion, obviously arranged for driving the chrono module. I had no issues with this prior to service and just added a small amount of grease between the driving wheel and the centre cannon pinion as the technical guide required. What's the best way of tightening these up? I would like to replace it but I guess this is going to be hard to find as it is dedicated to the DD chrono movement. 
    • He uses the micrometer cap, but he leaves the spring out (you can see that in the video). If you leave the spring in, the spindle will move up as well (as shown by @Knebo).
    • Seems like he doesn't have the micrometer cap  attached to the spindle so he can only push down but cannot pull up? If the cap screws into the spindle I guess you don't need the spring? I only have a "normal" Seitz so I really have no idea. 
    • Do you have a part number for the bearing shim lock tool?
    • Yes in my opinion the 3/4HP is plenty but it’s your decision & yes it does come with speed control but foot operation so my reason for changing to potentiometer was because my leg shakes so it was like me revving the lathe & anyway I prefer to set the speed. I & a few others that I recommended the motor to run a Pultra 10mm lathe so if you have a 6 or 8mm B & L then it will be plenty, if you have seen any of my videos you will have seen that when using a graver I run quite slow without any problems. Dell
×
×
  • Create New...