Jump to content

Refinishing after rust removal


RedVitus

Recommended Posts

I worked through this refinishing issue and decided to post my solution for forum readers who may end up in this situation.

During a routine watch service, I noticed a little surface oxidation on a pocket watch spring.  It wasn't a lot, so I tried removing with a glass fiber brush. That removed some of the rust, not all, so I decided to go further.

Then after some light work on a coarse diamond plate, the rust was gone, but it left a reflective, polished looked instead of the dull finish originally that all the other steel parts under the dial had. The two pictures below show how the spring looked after rust removal next to a part (yoke) with finish I was trying to match.  It looked almost passable from one angle but from another (direct on top) not very close.

20220918_160213.thumb.jpg.5662a5df1c3e5f680a4d35f1c2aea10a.jpg20220918_160148.thumb.jpg.34b15e0bfa848074eede71ff07b42a44.jpg

I hadn't come across the situation before. Typically when I refinish steel it is to mirror finish. Never tried to match a dull or grey finish.

First guess was that it would naturally dull over time and I shouldn't bother but after some thought I came to the opposite conclusion. 

I did a test to see if I could dull the metal to at least get something with less luster. Having some experince removing rust from old tools with vinegar, I knew that it changes the appearance- usually darkening steel. 

I decided to try it so placed the part in white vinegar. Perhaps a short soak would dull but not darken the metal? A few minutes  gave the grey that I was looking for. 

The after photo is below. Looks pretty darn close to my eyes.

20220918_161645.thumb.jpg.bd409dd4999789fcd7dec025fe52aa59.jpg

 

Edited by RedVitus
Removed a typing mistake
  • Like 6
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes, I was referring to the (jewelled) gear train with HP (most of the time, I use 1300, but when Rolex says 1000, I'll use 1000).
    • did I miss the update of the message of something changing?      
    • I suppose it would depend upon what your lubricating with those? for instance what does the manufacturer say about those lubricants? I have a PDF from the manufacture and a rather peculiar statement found on the bottom of the chart. my suspicion is the reason the recommending would be without epilam the HP oils like the spread except when they're in Ruby jewel's with steel pivots. tableEN lubrication 2020.pdf
    • These types of hairsprings become weak with age and very fragile. Which I expect it is that giving you trouble, and that wheel is not the correct one, if it were not bent I don't think the movement would run as the teeth are not the correct height. The problem you have is price which depends on you. It can be repaired but is it worth it to you, because there is little value in the clock. A wheel can be made and hairspring replaced. Or hang on to it and keep looking on ebay which is your best bet for replacement parts or even a complete movement but it will be like finding a needle in a haystack. 
    • I did that also for a few movements - well, mainly in/around the train jewels. I made big efforts to epilame the mainplate WITHOUT getting Epilame into the Pallet fork jewels (where it's not supposed to be, right?). I made litte barriers with Rodico around that jewel and used drops from a syringe to apply on the rest.  However, I've now stopped doing this. For three reasons: 1. It's a hassle and consumes more of this liquid gold. 2. I didn't see the need when using HP1000/HP1300 lubricants and grease for most part. The two places where I'd use 9010 (i.e. escape wheel and balance) receive Epilame in specific places... or the cap-jewel-setting of the balance suspends the oil sufficiently be capillary action (see my "conflict" about using Epilame on the balance jewels).  3. Lastly, and here I really wonder about yours and others' experiences: I felt that applying Epliame to the train jewels left them looking hazy (borderline dirty) compared to the (painstakingly achieved) sparkly clean results of my cleaning process. I just can't help but think that the Epilame residuals would mix with the oil and cause more friction/wear. I don't know.    simple: it'll stay there. It won't move any further. That's exactly what is happening if you epilame a cap stone. You end up placing the 9010 right on top of the epilame and the oil will sit nicely on that spot.
×
×
  • Create New...