Jump to content

Making a winding pinion


Recommended Posts

Wait are you T+T+T?

 

Good vid (as are most of theirs), but they missed something it seems almost everyone does when making a winding pinions- the feed of the angled cutter isn't in a line perpendicular to the axis of the pinion, it's a specific angle depending on the angle of the cutter and the number of teeth. This ensures full engagement of the teeth from periphery to center.

 

You can see it in this excellent illustration from Levins' Practical Benchwork for Horologists. They include a chart with the set angle for various numbers of teeth and cutter angles.

20220825_113429.jpg

Sometimes the cutter angle isn't a nice round number 60/70/80 degrees etc., like this tiny Piaget 430P winding pinion. It's 67 degrees, which I've seen and done before and probably explains why I happened to have a 67 degree cutter in my collection. Plugging that and 8 teeth into the math (from Robert Porter's The Clock and Watch Makers Guide to Gear Making) gives a set angle of 10.14 degrees, or 79.86 depending how you view it, which falls neatly between the numbers in the Levin book. You can see how tilted the axis of the dividing spindle is in the milling setup- quite pronounced. Worked great, and a big thumbed-nose to Piaget for making the part so weak to begin with AND not selling parts!

20211110_140833.jpg

20211110_155747.jpg

20211110_155902.jpg

20211110_161818.jpg

20211110_150029_AdobeExpress.gif

Edited by nickelsilver
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • What works for me (waiting for the villagers to assemble with torches and pitchforks) is to put a liberal (in watch terms) spot of 9010 on one of the pins of the pin pallet, this seems to improve amplitude and beat error.
    • Non-magnetic is a poor description of such a hairspring. A better description would be unmagnetisable hairspring. There are metals and alloys that are attracted to magnets, but don’t become magnetised themselves. A hairspring made out such a material will be attracted to magnetised tweezers, but will not become magnetised. These hairsprings can be disrupted by being in close proximity to a magnet, but the disruption will cease the moment the magnet is moved away. These are hairsprings that could conceivably be disrupted by a magnetised hairspring stud. Best Regards, Mark
    • More than enough. Here's mine at the height I work at. I think the working distance with the included 0.5x Barlow lens is about 9".   So yes, that halves the magnification. The full story is the objective lens goes from 0.7x to 4.5x. The eyepieces are 10x, giving you the advertised magnification of 7x-45x. However the working distance is unacceptably short, so it comes with an 0.5x Barlow lens, reducing the magnification range to 3.5x-22.5x, but giving you a good working distance. What I did was buy a pair of Extreme Widefield 20x Eyepieces for when I need more magnification. You keep your high working distance, but get your 45x magnification back, at the cost of some width of field.
    • Modern ones after blue steel, invar, elinvar and nivarox , the shiny one are not supposed to become magnetised. But i have had them jump to tweezers. And i dont really understand the comment that what can be magnetised is the stud carrier and rate regulator and they can attract the hairspring ? If the hairspring is non magnetic then how can it be attracted to something else thats become magnetise, its non magnetic , that doesn't really make sense to be ?
    • Does it say 17 jewels on the dial or on the movement ?
×
×
  • Create New...