Dial feet position? NH35 vs ETA 2824

[panchoskywalker]

Hello, 

I am looking for a dial for eta 2824 and I've seen this one that is suppose to be for NH35 but it has 4 feet on the back. 

Are those extra feet for 2824?

 

Edited July 28, 2022 by panchoskywalker
pictures

[tomh207]

For the ones I currently have they are indeed NH35/2824 compatible just remove the ones you don’t need

 

Tom

 

[panchoskywalker]

18 hours ago, tomh207 said:

For the ones I currently have they are indeed NH35/2824 compatible just remove the ones you don’t need

 

Tom

 

Really? So the date position is the same between both movements? I didn't know that.

Thank you.

[jdm]

3 hours ago, panchoskywalker said:

So the date position is the same between both movements? I didn't know that.

Movements in themselves do not have a set date or crown position. They are simply rotated in the case so that the crown goes anywhere is desired. The only part that changes is the date and day (if used) rings printed for the desired position, and a dial which is has the window cut to match.

[panchoskywalker]

9 hours ago, jdm said:

Movements in themselves do not have a set date or crown position. They are simply rotated in the case so that the crown goes anywhere is desired. The only part that changes is the date and day (if used) rings printed for the desired position, and a dial which is has the window cut to match.

What I meant is that the date window is in the place on the dial between eta 2824 and NH35.

[jdm]

9 minutes ago, panchoskywalker said:

What I meant is that the date window is in the place on the dial between eta 2824 and NH35.

Distance from center. That's good coincidence but consider that both mov.ts are the same size. Makers make it the largest possible because that allows the mov.t to be used on a larger watch without looking strange.