Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have been working on watch restoration and learning.  It has been great.  I have encountered all the joys and quite a few pitfalls (how delicate an escapement is, how tweezer skills are critical, crawling on the floor for a flying screw, etc. etc.) 🙂

What I am finding is there does comes a point when you need a microscope and this is my time (probably because I am retired and my eyes were better when I was 20)

Does anyone have some suggestions for a Microscope?  I would like to be able to capture (USB to my PC) images and video as well.

I have seen a lot on the Bausch and Lomb Stereozoom 7.  Is that a good place to start?  I see some used ones for reasonable prices.  I do understand the eyepieces make the difference as well?  What about a USB cameras?

Any thoughts about these cheap $40 USB microscope cameras I see on Amazon?  I probably now that answer. 

Thanks all for any advice.

Bob

Posted
  On 7/10/2022 at 1:44 AM, bobolink said:

Does anyone have some suggestions for a Microscope?  I would like to be able to capture (USB to my PC) images and video as well

Expand  

Have you given a read to the pinned topic below. It answers your and more questions.

 

Posted

Here are two I recommend

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/114450744089?hash=item1aa5cbc319:g:gfQAAOSwFE5fmcG0

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/124373214244?hash=item1cf538a424:g:RBoAAOSwOQpfmcWS

I went with the second one but if buying again I would go with the first.

The like most need a 0.5 Barlow lens to give a greater working distance and both take the standard C Mount Cameras that can be found at a reasonable price mine is a 14mp which is at the bottom end of acceptable but good enough for what I use it for, which is to record every step of a strip down to act as an aide memoire for the rebuild. 

Both can be found cheaper on the Chinese box shifter sites like Aliexpress etc but take a lot longer to arrive and the shipping is much higher so they end up not being that much cheaper when postage a taxes are factored in.

There are plenty of similar scopes around, just make sure yours has the important features

1. Make sure its a stereo microscope, the depth perception you get with a stereo scope makes all the difference

2. Make sure it takes the common size Barlow Lens

3. If you are going to fit a Camera make sure it has simulfocus otherwise you loose one of the eyepiece views when you want to use the camera.

The thread listed above by JDM has a lot of useful info so well worth reading through

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Like you, my eyes were better at 20 than they are now at 68. The 24 pages of discussions on microscopes that jdm linked above contain the collective wisdom of the group. As I noted in that thread on July 7th:

I pulled the trigger on eBay on a trinocular AmScope 7x - 45x boom stand microscope.

I'm very happy with it and despite retina problems in my left eye, I can indeed see in stereo depth which is pretty awesome.

Prior to my retirement, the company where I worked often used the small/cheap USB microscopes running into a PC to capture microscopic video.

I see you haven't posted in a while - did you give up looking for a scope? I also took a bit of a break after a series of less than stellar watch servicing outcomes. Let us know what you decided.

Posted
  On 9/6/2022 at 2:19 AM, grsnovi said:

Like you, my eyes were better at 20 than they are now at 68. The 24 pages of discussions on microscopes that jdm linked above contain the collective wisdom of the group. As I noted in that thread on July 7th:

I pulled the trigger on eBay on a trinocular AmScope 7x - 45x boom stand microscope.

I'm very happy with it and despite retina problems in my left eye, I can indeed see in stereo depth which is pretty awesome.

Prior to my retirement, the company where I worked often used the small/cheap USB microscopes running into a PC to capture microscopic video.

I see you haven't posted in a while - did you give up looking for a scope? I also took a bit of a break after a series of less than stellar watch servicing outcomes. Let us know what you decided.

Expand  

I’m still kicking. Thanks for the info. I haven’t decided yet on a scope more because I acquired an L&R  Master from 1954 that I am rebuilding. So all about money and time. I’ll post the results on that in another post.  But I started looking at Amscope so good to hear you like it.  I may get a cheap USB to hold me over. They are so cheap won’t hurt.   I’ll follow up when I decide. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am aware of one eBay seller who does cases for some American pocket watch sizes and also sells a case tube & sleeve assembly to work with American negative set keyless https://ebay.us/m/qa0ubk Also I have seen this seller many times but have never been clear on how they handle stems and crowns. https://ebay.us/m/4mhfEr I general though I don't think there are a lot of these cases out there, just a few sellers custom making them or adapting AliExpress cases somehow.
    • What type of glue you figure it was. I wonder if acetone dissolves super glue. 
    • What's the movements so we know what size cases you're looking for and what are the setting requirements.
    • As I am getting close, I would like to know the total thickness of the bezel (top to bottom).  I am working on two solutions--one is thinner than the other.  The crystal sits pretty proud relative to the bezel, and seems consistent with the pictures I have seen.  But, actual measurements would be nice.
    • A little bit of superglue and you'll be good to go Although maybe if you had a laser welder you can weld the spring back together. Typically I've only seen it on blued steel Springs and on one occasion a modern spring? The modern watch was a Rolex watch that came and that was literally filled with rust including the barrel was filled with rust in the spring was in a whole bunch of little pieces. I have to wonder if that was an aftermarket mainspring . Then I'm attaching a PDF the Elgin watch company as you can see instigated a study in the 30s find out why mainsprings were breaking. I do though wonder if perhaps there may be a flaw in their study? One other things I wonder about is the metallurgy of the early steel Springs versus the later generation of blued steel Springs whether the metallurgy as part of the problem but in a case they did a study and have attaching a PDF. Because of the study any time I do anything with the blued steel spring when I actually cannot get something that's not blued. Once the spring is cleaned I'm very careful to not to touch the spring with my fingers because I don't want to have a problem with the chemicals on your fingers causing rust and I very carefully get lubrication back on the spring as fast as possible just to avoid these unpleasant situations. Then yes it is interesting one minute you of functional spring and the next minute you have lots of little pieces of spring. For my own personal Elgin pocket watch I put a steel spring and in this happened I'm also guessing that when one layer breaks it sends a cascading shockwave through the spring and that's why it breaks all the way across because after all there is a lot of energy in the spring when it breaks. Oh and my theory on the metallurgy is based on things have improved and for the most part I don't think I've seen a shattered spring in quite some time.   Elgin_Mainsprings.PDF
×
×
  • Create New...