Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So the other week I bought a second hand stereo Microscope from facebook market and found out it didn't have the 48mm thread required to fit a barlow lens to it.

I'm a little bugger I didn't want to miss-out on this I thought long and hard about how I was going to fix this. at first I thought about just gluing the barlow the the microscope lets face it I only paid £25.00 so what was the harm of doing this, but them I realized what would happen if I needed a different barlow lens so thinking hard and looking at youtube some bloke hacked a led light adapter by placing it in a drill and while spinning the adapter grinding the inner part to fit his object lens. this looked really terrible and his thread was the wrong way around (male) so he also had to buy a another adapter too add a female thread to his microscope.

 

so thinking about this I came up with the idea to just glue a camera filter to the underside of the object lens SORTED works a treat and I now have a fixed 48 mm thread to my object lens happy chap and it only cost me £2.00 for a filter of the bay. 

 

If anyone needs a filter to convert there stereo microscope like mine I have a spare skylight filter you can have I bought a spare one just incase I glued it in place by placing it under my lens and then move the scope down until it trapped the filter and barlow lens while the glue went off (I left it over night) I placed glue all the way around the inside of the filter 

 

20220511_115020.thumb.jpg.76ff7846d3947a02c6f5714a56be5a75.jpg

  • Like 3
Posted

How does it work? Did you do anything to ensure that the Barlow lens is whatever intended distance from the next lens up the chain, or is that not a critical dimension?

Posted
2 hours ago, spectre6000 said:

How does it work? Did you do anything to ensure that the Barlow lens is whatever intended distance from the next lens up the chain, or is that not a critical dimension?

It's not critical and the barlow lens is only about 2 mm from it's intended distance. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I’m not to sure mate! I’ve sent a picture! The crown is off a Tissot 1853 automatic limited edition T115427 A GP19 moto go watch!   
    • For years and I'm still using it I've been using something called SeaMonkey? It's a Mozilla product Basically outscore its Firefox plus an integrated email program. But not the same problems here a lot of times when things are upgraded they tend to be now aimed at very specific browsers like Firefox so I've had to switch to Firefox to respond to any of the messages on the group. So yes they do seem to be getting more browser specific and that may be a reason for others having complications especially if whatever you using hasn't been updated. So yes the world is getting more browser specific perhaps for security reasons. Even though I use a product that is updated on a regular basis is still has problems. So whatever you using for browser should be up to date and if is not recognized it's going to be a problem.
    • I did remember to ask at work and minor complication? Well I suppose technically two separate complications. First off glass mineral glass versus Seiko's Hardlex Glass. Don't know if other companies have their own class or not and a basic class for crystals is probably not the same as window glass it would be more transparent. It becomes obvious if you're looking at a sheet of flat crystal glass versus window glass it's definitely more transparent you can see it when you look at the edges of it window glass looks green. No idea how that changes physical characteristics other than optical. Then we also have thickness like the Seiko five's there crystals are really sick compared to other things and I'm guessing that makes things different. In the first link it talks about Sapphire versus mineral glass. One other thing is bothering me though when I'm reading this is where is the source material? What I mean by this is could we end up with multiple generations of salespeople quoting the same sales tactic or information and we don't actually know because you don't have a source reference? Let me quote something off the website it's brittle oh dear I was sad? Except it's not immune to damage it can crack where shatter under extreme force or impact. So what is the definition of extreme force or impact? Then is that more or less extreme then mineral glass?  Then regarding the price difference while back I had asked the owner where the Sapphire came from and basically wherever he can get the cheapest. So typically ordered from a variety of online supply watch parts in the US and  aliexpress China.. Then yes it does make a difference because we go through a lot of glass crystals and sapphire https://thehorologylab.com/sapphire-crystal-vs-mineral-glass-which-is-best-for-your-watch#google_vignette Then I guess one is glass not glass when it goes by another name? Hardlex Looks like it's purely a Seiko product but now I wonder if other watch companies have their own special glass? I didn't remember from past experience my favorite was people exposed to welding you can find little blobs a metal stuck to the watch case the crystal still intact but there's little burnt holes were bits of metal had actually burnt into the crystal but it was still there. Okay website below starts off with Sapphire sounds good but Apparently it can shatter easier then Hardlex. https://theslenderwrist.com/hardlex-crystal/ One other thing is what I'm reading to websites would be back to I want to see the test results? Often times weren't looking for a subject will find websites where I basically called them these are better than that by the way but sometimes I'll find websites that I will call book review websites were basically the review other websites other material and don't really introduce anything new to the subject. As I said these websites look quite nice which is why I'm giving you a link but where's the test results the definition of extreme how extreme to break a sapphire versus a glass or Hardlex?  
    • What browser are you using Rich? Fine for me using Chrome 
    • Wiggle it back and forth, small steps, keeping the pallet cock as level as possible and take your time (!). You could also use an extra tool as a safeguard at the jewelled end to avoid pressure on the pallet fork. You also mention lubrication... On the pallet fork pivots??
×
×
  • Create New...