Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have noticed this on auction sites such as eBay high end watches being sold for staggering prices way above their actual RRP,s. 

In this months BHI mag there is an article that maybe reveals what is happening. 

The reasons for this is complex and deserve their own discussion, but one can include pandemic-induced Swiss manpower and materials shortages, a steep rise in the number of buyers with excess discretionary income, and the self-reinforcing effect of strong prices. So as always, these watches are consistently proving to be reliable stores of value and incredibly good investments. 

Two particular brands being Patek Philippe and Rolex who are now subject to these mega-price increases. Watches by Rolex now command phenomenal prices in the peer-to-peer market. For example the Rolex GMT-Master I easily commands £20,000-odd, against its RRP of £8,600. The stainless steel Cosmograph Daytona commanded some £20,000 (double the RRP) before the pandemic, but now cannot be had for much under £30,000, and every variant of the green bezel will set you back between around £20,000 and £ 40,000, against pre-pandemic figures of roughly half that.

This should be good news for watch owners, and good publicity for horology generally. However it also presents a problem though for manufacturers. With prices buoyant, many people who purchase watches from ADs (Authorised Dealers)find the onward-prices tempting, and so elect to sell them straight away, called ‘Flipping’.

One peculiar side-effect has been that some ADs have been attempting to stem the flow of watches from their clients wrists onto the open market. One strategy is by withholding of the Warranty Certificates by refusing to release warranty documents to buyers of certain Rolex and Patek Philippe models, instead issuing a promise to hand them over after one year if the customer would relent to allow his property to be examined at that time to ensure he had not sold it.

A watch without its original certificate is worth less than one with.

However, this seems to be having little lasting effect, because people are simply waiting the year before selling.

If I had a spare £10k/£20k I could be tempted to take a chance😊

  • Like 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello all, just disassembling to service, but I can’t figure out the working of the calendar work…it’s not operational the jumper and spring are ok, but the operation of the driving wheel has me at a loss. I can’t see a cam to drive anything. Is something damaged or missing? Help please!
    • Believe the relume (not a fan) was done a long time after the damage. 
    • I can only think of some chemical reaction to reluming
    • I have a little milling attachment for my WW lathe, but very rarely use it and not for wheel and pinion cutting. For that I use a small Sixis 101 milling machine. I normally do direct dividing, but sometimes have to do an odd count and use the universal index which also fits on the Sixis.   Back in the day when I didn't have a mill, I would cut gearing on my Schaublin 102. It has a universal dividing attachment which fits the back of the spindle. Both it and the one for the Sixis are 60:1 ratio, and with the set of 4  index plates I can do almost any division. When I've had to do a strange high count prime number, I print a disc with the needed division and just place the plunger on the dot. Any position error is reduced by a factor of 60 so still plenty accurate.   The machines are a mess in the pics as I'm in the process of making a batch of barrels for a wristwatch 🙃.   This is the Sixis. The head can also be placed vertically, as can the dividing spindle.   Dividing plates. The smaller ones fit another dividing spindle.   Universal divider for the Sixis. I put it together with parts from an odd Sixis spindle that takes w20 collets, like the Schaublin 102, and a dividing attachment from a Schaublin mill.     The dividing attachment for the 102. The gear fits in place of the handwheel at the back of the headstock.   And the little milling attachment for the WW lathe. I just set it on the slide rest to illustrate the size, you can see from the dust on it it really doesn't get used much. I think only when I change bearing in the head, to kiss the collet head seat (grinding wheel still in the milling attachment).
    • I read a lot about the quality (or lack thereof) of Seiko's 4R, 6R, 8L  movements...or more specifically the lack of regulation from the factory. Especially when compared to similar priced manufactures using SW200's or ETA's. I thought I'd ask those more in the know, do the 4R's and 6R's deserve their bad reputation, is it fairly easy for someone with minimal skills (or better yet a trained watch mechanic) to dial in these movements to a more acceptable performance.    For background I spent more on a 1861 Speedy years ago, expecting that the advertised 0-15s/d  would probably perform more like 5-7s/d. In reality it's been closed to 2-4s/d. 
×
×
  • Create New...