Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi Guys, still on my journey of stripping and trying to service old ETA movements and enjoying learning lots as I go from you guys thanks for all your help. I am not up the the level of changing balance staffs and dont have any of the tools so I stick to replacing the balance complete.

I have a few ETA 2472 watches I have picked up on the bay which I have "serviced" and got back up and running but a couple of them need the balances sorting so I need to get some balance complete.

Looking on the cousins it seems there are a couple of obsolete items but there is an available item which is Balance Complete Ordinary ( 721 ), ETA 2450, ETA2450721.

It does however list an obsolete item Balance Complete Inca Bloc, Shockproof ( 721.1 ), ETA 2450, ETA24507211.

The  watches I am trying to sort out are 2472 incabloc so I was wondering if anyone could tell me if there is a difference between balance complete 721 (ordinary) and 721.1 (inca bloc) and whether the balance complete that is available ETA2450721 is compatible.

Many thanks for your help

 

Posted
18 minutes ago, avantbiy said:

if there is a difference between balance complete 721 (ordinary) and 721.1 (inca bloc) and whether the balance complete that is available ETA2450721 is compatible.

Normally there is difference in the pivots length between balances complete that are made for regular, or for anti-shock jewels. Because of that they are not directly interchangeable and have slightly different part numbers. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Trying to figure out parts in interchangeability can be a problem? For instance if you look at the first link there was a lot of variations of this watch and we don't know how far the variations went beyond the general descriptions here. Then the second link there is the parts for your watch we see that there's three different balance completes.

Then things get more interesting go down to the balance staffs how many different balance staffs were there?Looks like eight different staffs fortunately you don't entirely have to worry because if you're replacing the balance complete you don't care if there were different other dimensions other than were talking about the length of the staff and shape and the pivots. If it's for a shock protected system it's more than just the pivots there's a special shape required to work with the entire system.

The third link is interesting and the we can look up balance staffs. Which isn't being overly helpful but does verify something?

3 hours ago, jdm said:

Normally there is difference in the pivots length between balances complete that are made for regular, or for anti-shock jewels.

Normally there'd be lots of dimensions they do indicate two different staffs that are two different lengths. Which exactly confirms what has already been said you have to get the right balance complete for your watch. It's not enough to have a balance complete for your model of watch it has to be the right balance completes. So if the watch had variations like Dawn shock protected versus shock protected they will not usually interchange. Cf. be very careful with parts not the jump to a conclusion that everything will always fit if there's variations over time which there usually is with watches.

 

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&0&2uswk&ETA_2472

http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=ETA_2472

https://www.balancestaffs.com/product.php

 

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • it would be nice to have the exact model of the watch the or a picture so we can see exactly what you're talking about. this is because the definition of Swiss watch could be a variety of things and it be helpful if we could see exactly the watch your dealing with then in professional watch repair at least some professionals they do pre-cleaned watches. In other words the hands and dial come off and the entire movement assembled goes through a cleaning machine sometimes I think a shorter bath perhaps so everything is nice and clean for disassembly makes it easier to look for problems. Then other professionals don't like pre-cleaning because it basically obliterates the scene of the crime. Especially when dealing with vintage watches where you're looking for metal filings and problems that may visually go away with cleaning. Then usually super sticky lubrication isn't really a problem for disassembly and typically shouldn't be a problem on a pallet fork bridge because there shouldn't be any lubrication on the bridge at all as you typically do not oil the pallet fork pivots.  
    • A few things you should find out before you can mske a decision of what to do. As Richard said, what is the crown and all of the crown components made of . Then also the stem .  The crown looks to have a steel washer that retains a gasket. So be careful with what chemicals you use to dissolve any stem adhesives or the use of heat. You might swell or melt the gasket unless you are prepared to change that also . The steel washer maybe reactive to alum. Something I've just used to dissolve a broken screw from a plate. First drilled out the centre of the screw with a 0.5mm carbide . Dipped only the section that held the broken screw in Rustins rust remover. This is 40 % phosphoric acid. 3 days and the screw remains were completely dissolved, no trace of steel in the brass threads. A black puddle left in the solution.
    • I suppose this will add to the confusion I have a roller jewel assortment. It lists out American pocket watches for Elgin 18 size and even 16 size it's a 50. But not all the various companies used 50-50 does seem to be common one company had a 51 and the smallest is 43. American parts are always interesting? Francis Elgin for mainsprings will tell you the thickness of the spring other companies will not even though the spring for the same number could come in a variety of thicknesses. But if we actually had the model number of your watch we would find it probably makes a reference that the roller jewel came in different dimensions. So overlook the parts book we find that? So it appears to be 18 and 16 size would be the same sort of the arson different catalog numbers and as I said we don't have your Mongol know which Log number were supposed to be using. Variety of materials garnered her sapphire single or double but zero mention about diameters. Then in a section of rollers in this case rollers with jewels we do get this down in the notes section Roller specifications but of course zero reference to the jewel size. I was really hoping the roller jewel assortment would give us sizes it doesn't really. But it does show a picture of how one particular roller jewel gauge is used  
    • Seems to still do it through my mobile data, I use an android phone almost exclusively, but I'll double check it. Thanks mark Strange, I'll try my laptop that utilities edge. I've been on site half hour since I got home, it hasn't done it yet. Thanks John
    • At work, I'm on MS Edge, not through chose, on my phone, chrome, no issues with either. 
×
×
  • Create New...