Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Good time of the day!

I got a used Cartier Vermeil 20mm as a gift. The watch was in a terrible condition, so I had the case re-plated with 24K, polished the glass and when it came to cleaning and oiling the 90 caliber I came to realization that I have no idea on how the setting mechanism is setup. The stem right now can be simply pulled out.

I read aIMG_20210210_092247.thumb.jpg.023bd73196d8a826eb43b17b6cb5c222.jpg related note here, but it does not really show if the setting spring is setup correctly in my variant, I also have a different configuration / shape of setting lever.

 

 

I will appreciate any guidance on how to assemble it correctly and any further oiling instructions.

Thank you.

Dmitry

Posted

Minor confusion on my part the number 90 and the number 690 Not exactly the same number are they? But both of them exist as a movement that has a similar look?

Sometimes with Cartier, EBEL And PIAGET You'll find that they all use the same movements usually with different numbers. Then if you're lucky you can find a tech sheet for one of those. Unfortunately for the 90 all I found out was at the third link the part that holds the stem in place interchanges with a ebel 87. Then the Cartier 690 is the same as the Piaget 690P Which might have been helpful because I do have some tech sheets for the Piaget  But just not that one.

The fourth link has an interesting picture of the part found on the third link and it's definitely interesting. Interesting is it has extra stuff on it so not quite sure how it's supposed to work.

So basically unfortunately when working on a really expensive watches like this could just is limited information out there.

 

https://calibercorner.com/cartier-caliber-690/

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&0&2uswk&Cartier_90

https://www.startimesupply.com/merchant2/merchant.mvc?Session_ID=4f77adef2f447de3435a26e82a0e41ef&Screen=PROD&Store_Code=1&Product_Code=CT-EB87-90-SL &Category_Code=

https://www.ebay.com/itm/Cartier-090-Set-Lever-detent-Genuine-New-also-fits-690-087-687/163908338192?hash=item2629b2c210:g:-iQAAOSwmeNdp4FQ

ct 90.JPG

Posted

Thank you @JohnR725.

I think you have taken me one giant leap towards victory here!

The caliber is marked as Cartier 90, and all research I have done to date states that the 690 movement is a supersession movement that was used in later shipments. Interestingly enough, the comment here https://calibercorner.com/cartier-caliber-690/ about this movement states that it has 8 jewels, which might be the difference between the movements, along with potentially a more recent / upgraded quartz mainboard.

The plate on the 90 movement clearly states SEVEN jewels, I am looking forward to counting them all when cleaning and oiling the movement once I get past the stem issue and get it to work again.

As for the 90 movement interchangablity, I have seen multiple sites claiming that the Cartier 90 is actually Ebel 90 movement. No information anywhere on any of these:(

However, based on the shape of the setting lever on ebay you shared, I now suspect that my lever is simply broken and needs replacement, as it looks differently and is missing the catch at the very end, yet unlike the one on ebay, mine has the through-hole at the end, while the one on ebay just has a notch. Thank you for the links, I had to break out a super-magnifier to check if the catch has broken off on the level, and at 25x I noticed that there is a remnant of a clean break on the soldered washer.

I will appreciate if you could share with me any spec sheets of similar / related movement, anything on quartz board parameters?

If you can share any generic oiling instructions I will appreciate it very much, so far I plan to use 9010 in all the usual key points, although I am a bit concerned about Mark's commen in the thread I have referenced in my initial message regarding oiling the jewels.

 

2021-02-10_19-45-30.png

2021-02-10_19-46-25.png

2021-02-10_19-47-24.png

Posted

One of the interesting things about this discussion group is if we can find the discussion it's probably been asked before may be perhaps. Although recently somebody asked about quartz watches I'm giving you a link should give the allotted good information to get started.

Then for your broken part yes I notice that. I can't tell us some pictures are just a generic part because others the part is very different.

Then about the only technical information I could find is this for the other version the 690. But it is good it has things like the current consumption and low voltage etc.

 

https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/18157-starting-on-quartz

3982_Cartier 690-1.pdf

Posted

The part on the setting lever that the arrow is pointing at doesn't look broken. But could you turn the setting lever over and take a picture of the underside. I think the pin that sits in the groove of the winding stem might be broken.

Posted
2 hours ago, HectorLooi said:

The part on the setting lever that the arrow is pointing at doesn't look broken. But could you turn the setting lever over and take a picture of the underside. I think the pin that sits in the groove of the winding stem might be broken.

Hello Hector - the lever in the picture is shown is the buttom side, the top side is all smooth and polished.

Here is the picture of the spring that pushes on the stem (in the groove), or at least I think that it is what it does. It simply does not fit any other way, unlike the lever, which I am not sure is positioned correctly in my picture from above.

@JohnR725 - thank you for the great source on the quartz and the thread, I am very new to this forum, so will need to do more digging around:)

2021-02-11_21-32-35.png

Posted
3 hours ago, HectorLooi said:

The part on the setting lever that the arrow is pointing at doesn't look broken. But could you turn the setting lever over and take a picture of the underside.

It's not quite that simple I'm afraid? On some of the quartz watches lever doesn't actually have a pin it just goes into the slot and the picture we have just isn't good enough to tell us that. The other problem is we have two separate people selling that part and a distinctly different for the same heart? Plus we don't have a tech sheet because one doesn't seem to exist for this watch.

3 hours ago, HectorLooi said:

I think the pin that sits in the groove of the winding stem might be broken.

In one of the images I circled the protruding pin. The other part seems to be a mystery? Plus on the mystery parts we get two sides of it which doesn't help at all.

90 sl-3.JPG

90 sl-2.JPG

90 s;-1.JPG

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • it would be nice to have the exact model of the watch the or a picture so we can see exactly what you're talking about. this is because the definition of Swiss watch could be a variety of things and it be helpful if we could see exactly the watch your dealing with then in professional watch repair at least some professionals they do pre-cleaned watches. In other words the hands and dial come off and the entire movement assembled goes through a cleaning machine sometimes I think a shorter bath perhaps so everything is nice and clean for disassembly makes it easier to look for problems. Then other professionals don't like pre-cleaning because it basically obliterates the scene of the crime. Especially when dealing with vintage watches where you're looking for metal filings and problems that may visually go away with cleaning. Then usually super sticky lubrication isn't really a problem for disassembly and typically shouldn't be a problem on a pallet fork bridge because there shouldn't be any lubrication on the bridge at all as you typically do not oil the pallet fork pivots.  
    • A few things you should find out before you can mske a decision of what to do. As Richard said, what is the crown and all of the crown components made of . Then also the stem .  The crown looks to have a steel washer that retains a gasket. So be careful with what chemicals you use to dissolve any stem adhesives or the use of heat. You might swell or melt the gasket unless you are prepared to change that also . The steel washer maybe reactive to alum. Something I've just used to dissolve a broken screw from a plate. First drilled out the centre of the screw with a 0.5mm carbide . Dipped only the section that held the broken screw in Rustins rust remover. This is 40 % phosphoric acid. 3 days and the screw remains were completely dissolved, no trace of steel in the brass threads. A black puddle left in the solution.
    • I suppose this will add to the confusion I have a roller jewel assortment. It lists out American pocket watches for Elgin 18 size and even 16 size it's a 50. But not all the various companies used 50-50 does seem to be common one company had a 51 and the smallest is 43. American parts are always interesting? Francis Elgin for mainsprings will tell you the thickness of the spring other companies will not even though the spring for the same number could come in a variety of thicknesses. But if we actually had the model number of your watch we would find it probably makes a reference that the roller jewel came in different dimensions. So overlook the parts book we find that? So it appears to be 18 and 16 size would be the same sort of the arson different catalog numbers and as I said we don't have your Mongol know which Log number were supposed to be using. Variety of materials garnered her sapphire single or double but zero mention about diameters. Then in a section of rollers in this case rollers with jewels we do get this down in the notes section Roller specifications but of course zero reference to the jewel size. I was really hoping the roller jewel assortment would give us sizes it doesn't really. But it does show a picture of how one particular roller jewel gauge is used  
    • Seems to still do it through my mobile data, I use an android phone almost exclusively, but I'll double check it. Thanks mark Strange, I'll try my laptop that utilities edge. I've been on site half hour since I got home, it hasn't done it yet. Thanks John
    • At work, I'm on MS Edge, not through chose, on my phone, chrome, no issues with either. 
×
×
  • Create New...