Jump to content

Wittnauer Compressor Diver


Recommended Posts

My Dad gave this to me on my 14th birthday.  I had wanted it for several years.  Some years later, I had another dial made for it that was customized with my name on it.  I kept the original dial. 

Today, I finally got the courage to take it apart and restore the original dial.

Judging from the lume on the hands, I am guessing that maybe I did that myself a lifetime ago.  Part of me wants to have the dial and hands refinished to match.  The other part of me says no...leave it be.

Maybe a little surprising that I would be nervous about doing this today.  Already in the last few months, I have disassembled and reassembled several watches (one a chronometer Chronograph) without much fan fare.  But, this watch is personal...the others were from the junk box.

 

1028653413_2021-01-2210_58_28-Photos.png.2dee7e1144804891ed46b3a47f520c5f.png

Edited by LittleWatchShop
corrected chronometer to chronograph
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, PastorChris said:

I know that opinions vary wildly on such things, but I'd keep it the way it is, save for servicing to keep it running well. I'd love to see the custom dial you made, even if you prefer to plus you name out.

Here it is.  They did a pretty poor job IMO.

I ordered a set of NOS hands (for a pretty penny!).  When the new hands are installed, I will post an update.

Old dial_edit.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, the new (NOS) hands came in today and I installed them.  Goodness what a challenge.  Hour and minute hand fit just find but the second hand hole was too small.  Argh!!  Fortunately, my dad had a very good collection of broaches in his watch bench.  I had seen them but forgot which drawer.  Double argh!! 

Well, found them and put the finest on a pin vice and carefully increased the hole size.  I would put the original hand on the broach and measure how far it extended and then compare with the new one as I reamed.  Nerve-racking for sure.  But I got it.

Here is the watch with the new hands.  Much better with matching lume.

2021-01-29 16_32_54-Photos.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thanks, ManSkirtBrew.  I started looking for a setup like yours and ran across this.  It was about half the price of the JKA Feintaster (depending on what auction you were in), and it's a Bergeon.  I bought it because I thought the price was fair (eBay - Buy it now), and I'm a sucker for vintage tools. It also has a table, so it should be easy to use for measuring jewels. I wonder if the the contact points can be changed out. Bergeon seems to manufacture new tables and accessories for the contemporary dial version. What do you guys think of it? I'm sorry this post seems to have taken a detour. I'm new here so let me know if I should start a new topic.
    • This is a flying cutter, usual one. The cutter itself is shown in the pictures in the first message, it is made of broken tungsten carbide drill bit. I asure that all the angles of the cutter are as they should be. I have video - little older one - that I made when onse making the same kind of winding pinion for a Poljot 2200, which is even smaller than this one. It is not easy to see in the video, but the tool rest moves about 1mm towards the object in Y direction and then returns back untill cutter is rotating. Then the spindle is rotated one tooth ahead and everything repeated untill all teeth are cut.
    • After a bit further research could it possibly be an AS 970?
    • Latest project was a non-running ebay purchase with an FHF70 movement. I stripped and cleaned it, reassembled it, and got it running. So far so good, nothing damaged AFAIK.  I was oiling the top jewel on the balance (the one in the cock) which was a slightly unusual shock setting. I removed the spring (3 leaves) which was part of a chaton holding the cap jewel. This left the hole jewel behind which I retrieved with rodico and then lost it. I was taking it off the rodico, very gently as I thought, with tweezers, and then it just disappeared.  Fast forward a week, I got a donor movement, non-running, with the plan to just take the shock jewel that I’d lost. It was the same movement but had standard incabloc settings, and was steel rather than copper/brass.  I changed the cock and balance complete and it ran, not very well. I switched the lower jewel setting, cleaned and oiled both jewels and the replacement balance. Without the pallet fork the balance swings very nicely with a puff of air. With the fork in place, balance out, it flicks side to side nicely with power in the mainspring.  Put them together and it doesn’t run. The impulse jewel sits in the fork and it stops.      Any suggestions how I proceed? In case you didn’t follow that I have 2 FHF70 movements, nothing broken as far as I can tell, but mixing up the balance wheels and jewel settings results in a non runner. 
    • Oh and this almost perfect third wheel pivot and slightly set mainspring  Ah ok yes i see what you mean, good idea. I'll try that if i fluff this one up. The image isn't great quality but i like the idea though.
×
×
  • Create New...