Jump to content

Revue 73 timegrapher problems


JohnC

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I am attempting to time a Wittnauer / Revue 73 manual-wind movement. It's meant to be a Christmas gift to my sister, so time is pressing.

After servicing, the watch runs decently with good amplitude. I've put the watch in beat visually, but the problem is that the timegrapher is telling me the watch is badly out of beat. However, the trace on the screen actually suggests it's not very out of beat at all. I also distrust the timegrapher amplitude reading, although I looked up the lift angle and set it at the "correct" 52 degrees.

What should I trust - the number on the machine, or my own eyes (and ears)? Many thanks. Photo attached.

IMG_20201202_220307851.jpg

Edited by JohnC
Link to comment
Share on other sites

more than likely the numeric display is correct for the beat error. We've had this discussion somewhere in the discussion group this particular machine has a minor issue. The graphical display isn't big enough to actually show the maximum the machine can read of 9.9 ms. basically the graphical display is magnified so at around 4 ms I think it basically rolls over. So the lines can be close together as the number gets bigger and graphically it looks great but numerically it looks bad. Another problem with all of the timing machines is with amplitude if the amplitude is too low to read the wrong part of the waveform and a look much nicer than it really is. Then a course if you in a noisy signal that screws up everything he gives you very peculiar feedings.

Then helpful in these situations or basically good practice always look at your watch in more than one position. So you wind the watch up letter run around 30 minutes to stabilize. Time it dial-up then dial down and the wristwatch crown down would be good. Then give us pictures of all three of those.

Visually when you put the watch in beat what were you looking at? Then did you change the mainspring?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks @JohnR725 and good call. I always get heart palpitations whenever I have to manually adjust the beat, so I really did not want to do it. My usual practice is to line the regulator pins up with the pivot jewels. Then I remove the balance and with the assembly upside-down, note where the stud should be in order to line up the impulse jewel with the curb pin. That said, I don't like doing it because I've had quite a few tragic slip-ups with the screwdriver.

That said, this time no screw-ups. Got it down to about 0.2, which is more luck than skill. Amplitude looks about 300, which is what the timegrapher says. Positional error is a little much, which could be a hairspring issue or a heavy spot on the wheel. Max 0.3 change in beat error between dial up, pendant down, and pendant left (12 down). I think I'm gonna call this one done!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello JonhC, also as well as above answer make sure you have no other working watches on the bench or near the machine. You would be very suprized how sensitive these machines are, and it will throw your readings 

 

Edited by Graziano
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Rich, this one seems rather regular movement to me. Yes, what You describe exists, but I doubt that the one on the picture is something similar.
    • @Neverenoughwatches Many thanks for your remarks. As I wrote earlier, I was a bit reluctant to disassemble this movement, and you gave me further motives to be careful. I'll just remove it from its case so as to clean it a little.
    • I am not sure for the terms in english, but if I directly translate from Bulgarian or Russian, there are 'magnetic soft' and 'magnetic hard' magnetic materials. The first group will not get magnetised, thow they will be attracted by magnets. The soft iron for example. The second group, like hardened steel, will get magnetised. So non magnetic hairspring aloys belong to the first group.
    • Looks like it is only dirt. If rust, then this means the strenght of the spring is reduced in places with rust, so the spring is damaged and useless. Only light surface rust, which is rather residual from other places activity of rust can be cleaned, and no chemicals that can etch the metals of the spring aloy should be used
    • Hello, I'm after some help on getting a functional tool for removing and replacing case tubes, the friction fit type not the threaded type. I have previously owned two Chinese Ali Express tools, which worked, but in each case after using on a watch case with an angle the watch had to be manually held perpendicular and when this angle was not perfectly aligned the pusher pin inevitably received a slight side load and the tool body was damaged. Due to the fact that the hole which holds the pusher pin is so close to the end of the block and the material wall is so thin: The result was that the hard pusher pin stretched and deformed the hole and the pusher pin was then slack and no longer perpendicular, and eventually the material split altogether. After I looked at the tool I realised that the block the hole was machined into was aluminum, this coupled with the extremely thin wall made this hole very weak and prone to the deformation and damage I had experienced. I looked to another reputable supplier (see below) who advertised their tool as "all steel" and I even contacted their customer support who confirmed that the block in question was made of steel. I was very disappointed yesterday when it arrived and found that it was in fact aluminum and not steel as promised. I could tell by the feel of the material (weight) and confirmed with a magnet which would not 'stick' and have since requested a return/refund. Assuming the return/refund goes smoothly, I am still left with my original problem of not having a tube pusher tool - does anyone have any recommendation for a tool which will work and will also stand the test of time?
×
×
  • Create New...