Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Good morning everyone, I hope this message finds you all well and healthy!  I have a question in regards to a ladies Bulova watch that I am currently working on.  The watch came to me with a broken hairspring and I just so happened to have a parts movement in my stock.  The movement is a Bulova 6AH.  After servicing the movement and swapping the the donor hairspring the watch starts up and runs nicely.  After putting the watch on the timing machine it showed otherwise.  The watch ran at +600 seconds per day with the regulator arm central in the balance cock.  After inspecting the donor spring more carefully, there was a larger patch of rust on the spring.  I put the spring in the ultrasonic to try to knock off the rust and visually it looked really good after doing so.  After reassembly the watch now shows +445 seconds per day which is certainly an improvement but not where it needs to be yet.  The beat error is at 4ms so i will take care of that first.  So I'm thinking that maybe the rust that was on the spring has done some lasting damage to it and that is causing the issue.  The person I am doing this for does not have to budget to spend on a new hairspring but I would like to do what I can to get this right for them as it has sentimental value.  So my question is, are there any mean time screws on this balance that I could adjust to slow it down?  I'm used to balance wheels that have the 2 screws in line with the balance arms and I don't see anything like that here.  So can anyone tell me how I can use what's  here to slow it down?  Any input would be much appreciated! 

Balance.jpg

Posted

Small calibers - pleasure to work with .. NOT.

It's impossible to tell what went wrong simply by looking at the photo you provided.

I would loosen up the balance cock screw while watch is running to see if the hairspring pin would readjust its position. Sometimes we fix the pin in a slightly angled position (see photo attached).

And you do not have to keep the regulator in the middle position, right? Move it to make hairspring longer - this will slow down your watch.

Capture - Copy.PNG

Posted

I just finished my own thread about something similar which might be helpful. Consensus in my thread was the hairspring and balance wheel are paired to each other and can't simply be changed around like it would appear. I've done a good bit of research on the subject outside of that thread and found numerous other references stating the same thing. I'll leave it to someone more experienced to offer some more direct guidance to you but thought I would mention this as its a current affair of my own as well. Good luck!

 

Posted

Poljot, thanks for your quick reply!  Yes they sure do present their challenges that's for sure!  Yes, I'm aware the regulator does not need to be centered, I just like to get the timing as close as possible with the regulator in the center before I start to use it.  And as much as its gaining the regulator by itself won't be able to take care of that kind of number.  That's a good idea with the stud screw, I will give that a try! The main reason for the picture I took was to show the arrangement of the screws wondering if any of them could be identified as the mean time screws, as there are no obvious ones at the balance arms which I am used to.  

Posted

That's a great thread ddrescueb2048, lots of great info in there!  I'm starting to think that is the case with what I'm dealing with.  I did count the number of coils from one to the other and they seemed similar but close doesn't always cut it in the watch world!  

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If he was much younger and some sort of sports player it wouldn't be a problem. They would be in there and doing surgery and he'd be back on the field in no time. Unfortunately when you get older little things are bad and big things can be really bad so not good at all.
    • Where I work everything incoming watches whatever detailed descriptions are taken entered into a computer program and photograph of each item. Then ideally although it depends on who's doing the paperwork detailed descriptions can be quite good other times there lacking. Like I really like it with pocket watches if they would record the serial number it avoids confusion later on. Then when watch repairs are completed that is also entered in. It's one of the amusements I learned when I was in school instructor had a shop and commented about the important aspect of keeping detailed records of repairs. Because oftentimes a customer who got a new crystal will come back later on when the watch doesn't work and expect you to fix the entire watch for free. Then you can remind them that they just got a crystal. Strangely enough that keeps coming up or occasionally comes up where I work now. One of the problems of using the service marks on the case is that in the case of pocket watches oftentimes that's not the original case. Then case marks? What I was doing warranty work for a company I used to describe a code number in the back of the case and it would tell me the next time I see the watch that basically what I did I made no attempt at keeping track of customers because we had literally thousands of them I think they sold 30,000 of these watches and they would come back by the hundreds because they had a lifetime warranty. Yes that's a story all of itself but I would put a code number that would reference what was done to the watch the last time and think I had a date in there somehow so it did tell a story if you knew the code. Another shop I once worked out the number would reference the page in the book. So other than knowing we had been in there you would have no idea what happened because you have to go look at the page in the book to see what happened. Then the problem of how you examine a watch you should examine the watch in detail every single time to avoid complications. Although on vintage watches and this is a of amusement I have at work when people ask something and I say of the watches done when it leaves. This is because on vintage oftentimes problems won't show up until the watches much farther into the repair like it's now running and you discover things that you can't discover before because it wasn't running to discover them that also become sometimes difficult to have exact rigid prices are estimates of repairs or in the case of a pocket watch you may not find out if a casing problem to later on when you case it up in the watches running. I was just thinking for all those people that would like to leave a mark maybe you should learn to do what some of the past watchmakers did? Leave a mark but leave it in such a way that no one will ever find it? Typically not done for repair purposes but done for other reasons like identifying it's legit. I have a friend with a Gruen watch and one of the Roman numbers the bottom line that just looks like a line under extreme magnification actually says Gruen watch company or something equivalent. So here's a link showing how to mark your watch without being seen although that's not the actual title. So if you can learn micro engraving you can engrave the watch someplace probably just about any place you just have to remember where you put it. https://cnaluxury.channelnewsasia.com/obsessions/how-to-prove-if-watches-are-authentic-secret-signatures-182516  
    • I have acquired a Citizen Leopard 36000 watch. My reason for purchasing it was my desire to own a timepiece with a 36,000 BPH movement, and the price was reasonable. Another motivating factor was gaining hands-on experience with the mechanism. The watch is in good condition, but I intend to fully disassemble it for maintenance. First and foremost, if anyone has prior experience with this particular model, I would greatly appreciate their insights. I do not have access to Citizen’s specialized lubricants and will need to use the ones available to me, such as 9010, 8000, and 8300 grease. Additionally, I do not possess the appropriate oil for the pallet jewels and will only be able to clean them.
    • Hello all, I am working on an older Valjoux Chrono. It doesn't have a stamp on the movement anywhere but I believe it is a Valjoux 72. I installed the train of wheels and they will not turn. The problem appears to be the 4th wheel and the escape wheel are not interfacing correctly. I had to replace both of these parts as the pivots were broken on each. I sourced genuine Valjoux/ETA replacements. I think the problem is with the escape wheel as all the wheels turn perfectly if I remove just the escape wheel.  My question to those with more Valjoux experience is am I mistaken? Is this some other model altogether and I have the wrong part or parts?    
    • I would remove the wheels, check for damage and if not damaged, clean. 
×
×
  • Create New...