Jump to content

Rob56


Robbie56

Recommended Posts

I always wanted a carriage clock so took the plunge and bought this one for £40 at auction. The clock was a bit dirty so only cleaned with a cloth. A couple of the external screws have slight surface corrosion, a bit of dust inside the “cabinet” and the glass edges had grime build up.  There is no name on the clock, as far as I can see. I bought the clock unsure if it was working however a couple of turns with the key and tick tick it worked ! I read a number of posts on here and was a surprised to learn of the Chinese interest in carriage clocks. Is my clock genuine ? Keeps good time too.

B3AF3D38-156C-4A91-9873-64B5F32735E6.jpeg

814F0EC4-8272-40C0-B974-1C3368DAC56A.jpeg

7777BEB4-0810-4F10-B6A3-A72AC6545E14.jpeg

018F3E2C-A5E9-40CC-AFC8-254F26166DD9.jpeg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes your clock is a genuine French carriage timepiece of around 1890-1910 period with a cylinder escapement and a case style know as Corniche, they where not always marked with a makers name and many retail jewellers of the time would add their own name to the dials before sale. Apart from needing a clean it looks to be in good condition the cylinder platform needs a service it is set right at the limit of its regulation so needs attention, its important that the glass appears to be in good order because it is very expensive to replace chipped or damaged ones because they have to be cut to order, the french never really successfully standardised glass size's although they made some attempt to do so.

Although this would have been regarded as a cheaper French carriage clock when produced, the quality will still be far superior to the Chinese fakes.

Edited by wls1971
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Many thanks wls for your reply, much appreciated. The clock does need a clean, particularly the dust inside the cabinet. I’ve only had the clock a few days and over a twelve hour period she gained eight minutes, the “time lever” for setting the “time accuracy” being set to F. At the time I took the photograph I had set the lever to S  and over a further twelve hour period she correspondingly lost approximately six minutes. Today I have the lever set at the mid point so will be interesting to see the outcome.
When you mention the “cylinder platform needs a service” is that the mechanism at the top of the clock which I have been adjusting via the lever ?
The glass appears to be original, heavy but dirty around the edges. I suspected my carriage clock to be at the cheaper end of those produced but it does have a look of quality. Maybe that says something about it’s age. Nevertheless it’s nice to know that it is an original piece - many thanks for your time. I’ve attached of a photo of my previous favourite mechanical clock but the carriage clock is the one I look at first !

0B259078-7AA2-49B0-A1B7-CF0B9C123F61.jpeg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Robbie56 said:

When you mention the “cylinder platform needs a service” is that the mechanism at the top of the clock which I have been adjusting via the lever ?

Yes that's the platform escapement, the one on your clock is a cylinder escapement, the better clocks where fitted with platform Lever escapements, which are more accurate and effected less by changes in temperature.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wis1971 has told you everything you need to know about your carriage clock. Just like to add I can't see any fine cracks on the dial which is a good thing. It needs a good clean. Cylinder escapements don't tend to keep such good time as the balance wheel is not compensated, so depending on the weather time keeping might change a bit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Many thanks to you both. I adjusted again yesterday and is now 1 minute fast over twelve hours. I’ll leave it for a few days and see what happens. Not bad for 120ish years and probably continuous movement. I just had a look at the dial under torchlight but couldn’t spot any fine cracks.
The clock does need a clean externally but internally too. I was thinking of removing the case only and using a paintbrush to remove the dust. There is a single screw on the base which seems to be the first hurdle to access. I’m not too sure if I should polish externally. From previous posts I read that such clocks had a gilt finish. If so most of mine has gone so I may be end up polishing brass that was never meant to be seen ? Thereagain at the cheaper end of the spectrum the finish was maybe not gilt ?
Much appreciated, R

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First I would put an elastic band around the case, this will hold it together. Turn the clock upside down and some times there is a plate that has a screw in the middle (many plates go missing) un-screw that and you should have four screws in each of the corners, you need to un screw those (make a note to replace them in the same holes when putting the case back together) the movement should just lift out. The band will hold the case. make sure when putting back you get the pin on the door to go in its hole. 

If you want to polish the case and movement just ask and I can help you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks. There is a plate in the bottom with one screw in the centre. I take your point on the door pin, I’ve had a good look ! (The door closes well being a good fit - again surprising with her age).

Looking at the fittings I think it is some time since the clock has been opened. I’ll let you know how I get on. 
Thanjs, R

B75B44E9-F037-4ADA-B685-5B48CFCDB3FF.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Removed casing and dust freed clock as per instructions. Used the elastic band suggestion which no doubt avoided a problem or two. Noticed a repair to a couple of teeth in the large cog on the “spring drum”. Nearly forgot the door when reassembling. Most awkward part is the alignment of the single screw on the bottom cover plate. Again many thanks,

R

2642C99C-FAB6-4508-96D3-C2441B7A54E0.jpeg

5D2EB330-30C2-4B5D-AE98-325A8E9A5627.jpeg

AAAD277F-AC73-436C-87DD-D04A6E5BD597.jpeg

58619B64-C1C6-41A2-A7B2-36C08D86DEA3.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for all your help. I must admit the clock now looks a lot cleaner and should be good for a few years I hope. The photographs don’t do it justice.There are always a few carriage clocks at the local auction and from my limited knowledge they don’t have that “Made in China” feel to them.  I’ve also had a look at other carriage clock movements and a number of them have many more working parts than mine ! I’ll keep an eye open for something a little more upmarket,

Thanks Again,

R

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just remember this about carriage clocks. If the movement has had a new platform fitted leave it alone, the value will have decreased a lot. Good dials are a must, any cracks no matter how small will also effect the value. The glass panels can be very expensive to replace.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thanks, ManSkirtBrew.  I started looking for a setup like yours and ran across this.  It was about half the price of the JKA Feintaster (depending on what auction you were in), and it's a Bergeon.  I bought it because I thought the price was fair (eBay - Buy it now), and I'm a sucker for vintage tools. It also has a table, so it should be easy to use for measuring jewels. I wonder if the the contact points can be changed out. Bergeon seems to manufacture new tables and accessories for the contemporary dial version. What do you guys think of it? I'm sorry this post seems to have taken a detour. I'm new here so let me know if I should start a new topic.
    • This is a flying cutter, usual one. The cutter itself is shown in the pictures in the first message, it is made of broken tungsten carbide drill bit. I asure that all the angles of the cutter are as they should be. I have video - little older one - that I made when onse making the same kind of winding pinion for a Poljot 2200, which is even smaller than this one. It is not easy to see in the video, but the tool rest moves about 1mm towards the object in Y direction and then returns back untill cutter is rotating. Then the spindle is rotated one tooth ahead and everything repeated untill all teeth are cut.
    • After a bit further research could it possibly be an AS 970?
    • Latest project was a non-running ebay purchase with an FHF70 movement. I stripped and cleaned it, reassembled it, and got it running. So far so good, nothing damaged AFAIK.  I was oiling the top jewel on the balance (the one in the cock) which was a slightly unusual shock setting. I removed the spring (3 leaves) which was part of a chaton holding the cap jewel. This left the hole jewel behind which I retrieved with rodico and then lost it. I was taking it off the rodico, very gently as I thought, with tweezers, and then it just disappeared.  Fast forward a week, I got a donor movement, non-running, with the plan to just take the shock jewel that I’d lost. It was the same movement but had standard incabloc settings, and was steel rather than copper/brass.  I changed the cock and balance complete and it ran, not very well. I switched the lower jewel setting, cleaned and oiled both jewels and the replacement balance. Without the pallet fork the balance swings very nicely with a puff of air. With the fork in place, balance out, it flicks side to side nicely with power in the mainspring.  Put them together and it doesn’t run. The impulse jewel sits in the fork and it stops.      Any suggestions how I proceed? In case you didn’t follow that I have 2 FHF70 movements, nothing broken as far as I can tell, but mixing up the balance wheels and jewel settings results in a non runner. 
    • Oh and this almost perfect third wheel pivot and slightly set mainspring  Ah ok yes i see what you mean, good idea. I'll try that if i fluff this one up. The image isn't great quality but i like the idea though.
×
×
  • Create New...