Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi All

I'm a beginner and this my first attempt to install a mainspring on an automatic.  The movement is AS1700

I understand that I'm to place a small amount of braking grease to the inside of the barrel.  I've purchased moebius 8217.  Two questions come to mind 1) how much of this should be applied and 2) when I push the new spring in won't it simply push the wall grease to the bottom??

Here are pics of the old and new springs.

Many thanks for any help!

Charlie

 

IMG_3301.JPG

IMG_3378.JPG

IMG_3379.JPG

IMG_3380.JPG

Posted

I'm a beginner too. But for what it's worth my method is this. I put on gloves and apply a thin coat of 8200 to the spring itself. Gently running it through my thumb and forefinger. I put a few dots of 8200 on the barrel wall and, as in the illustration below from Practical Watch Adjusting, 3 dots on the side of the coiled up spring. I use D5 on the arbour at the points shown in the illustration. Just a little dot is sufficient. It works pretty well for me.

 

 

IMG_1279.thumb.jpeg.32056a5db4cdae11a6cde2c689f25851.jpeg

Posted

Hi Charlie,

I did an AS 1700 myself not long ago, and I also bought a new spring, which is much easier than reusing the old one. You'll find that that holder it's supplied in is slightly smaller in diameter than the inside of the barrel. Just lay it on top (check the direction!) and push the spring carefully down into the barrel. As the spring escapes from the holder it expands into the barrel.The grease you put on the inside wall beforehand will be squeezed outwards rather than downwards.

I wasn't sure how to describe the right amount of grease, so I looked for a video on you tube and found this one - Classic Watchmaking: Barrel Wall Lubrication. He greases the barrel wall right at the end. The answer it seems is a HUGE amount! Certainly much, much more than I put in. Maybe some of our more experienced members can offer their opinions.

  • Like 1
Posted

Thank you both. 

I didn't plan to unwind it from it's package; just push it in.   I've read that some springs come lubricated with teflon.  As you can see the package doesn't state it.   Would you still recommend I use the 8200 (which I do have).

1 hour ago, Klassiker said:

He greases the barrel wall right at the end. The answer it seems is a HUGE amount! Certainly much, much more than I put in

Yes!  It does seem like a good amount.  

Posted
18 minutes ago, margolisd said:

Do you have a winding tool?

Yes but its for springs that wind in the other direction.  

Posted
19 hours ago, Lc130 said:

 I've read that some springs come lubricated with teflon.  As you can see the package doesn't state it.   Would you still recommend I use the 8200 (which I do have). 

if the spring feels dry to the touch then I would definitely add grease. From what I can gather, it's hard to over-lubricate mainsprings. You just don't want it leaking out of the barrel and all over the rest of the movement. Not enough lubricant on the other hand is bad. If you've got the 8200 then use it. I'd put a smear on the inside face of the barrel and the same on the lid, then two or three spots on the coils once the spring is in, like margolisd shows in his post above.

Posted

I think the dilemma is whether to apply the 8200 along the length of the MS through the thumb and forefinger as I suggested. I normally do this but I don't know how much difference it makes. If he does this it means he'd need a mainspring winder to get it into the barrel which he doesn't have. If he skips doing this he can pop it right into the barrel from the holder it's packaged in.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was wondering because of the alum idea. 
    • just a reminder about this test is it's not a perfect test it's a quick test. In other words you can adjust the banking pins that are both the same and visually this test will pass everything looks the same but both banking pins can be in the wrong place. although the majority of time when people are playing with banking pins I don't put them in the same place. one of things have to be careful of is I believe some of the pallet fork measuring tools that actually give you the roller jewel size are actually size so that I get confused? What I mean by this is if you inserted a whatever size in and are always told to go a slightly smaller I thought that the gauge itself its number corresponded to give you the exact number. So a lot of it depends upon the gauge itself I think you do want the roller jewel slightly smaller because it does have to fit in the slot and it does have a little bit a play. But if it's too small you will lose energy so does have to be sized right. Oh other things to check is? I'm attaching an Elgin sheet on checking the escapement I've seen references in the past to making sure that the slot in the four corn is nice and smooth and apparently you can end up with a rough slot and then the recommendation is to polisher clean that up. Not sure how well that's really going to work even if it has been the recommendation of other reference materials. yes art full plate watches fun when they don't work. This is where it's nice to have another set of eyes sometimes as maybe they'll find something you didn't  although that can add other issues. The owner of the shop provides himself on his skills of so now two of my watches have relocated to his bench to solve problems both real and imaginary I'm sure that will get fixed eventually hopefully. But still sometimes another set of eyes might see something that you're not. yes this sort of thing can be quite frustrating. Also makes for an interesting problem unless of course you're the one trying to solve the problem that it's a Escapement Elgin setting up the escapement.PDF
    • I’m not to sure mate! I’ve sent a picture! The crown is off a Tissot 1853 automatic limited edition T115427 A GP19 moto go watch!   
    • For years and I'm still using it I've been using something called SeaMonkey? It's a Mozilla product Basically outscore its Firefox plus an integrated email program. But not the same problems here a lot of times when things are upgraded they tend to be now aimed at very specific browsers like Firefox so I've had to switch to Firefox to respond to any of the messages on the group. So yes they do seem to be getting more browser specific and that may be a reason for others having complications especially if whatever you using hasn't been updated. So yes the world is getting more browser specific perhaps for security reasons. Even though I use a product that is updated on a regular basis is still has problems. So whatever you using for browser should be up to date and if is not recognized it's going to be a problem.
    • I did remember to ask at work and minor complication? Well I suppose technically two separate complications. First off glass mineral glass versus Seiko's Hardlex Glass. Don't know if other companies have their own class or not and a basic class for crystals is probably not the same as window glass it would be more transparent. It becomes obvious if you're looking at a sheet of flat crystal glass versus window glass it's definitely more transparent you can see it when you look at the edges of it window glass looks green. No idea how that changes physical characteristics other than optical. Then we also have thickness like the Seiko five's there crystals are really sick compared to other things and I'm guessing that makes things different. In the first link it talks about Sapphire versus mineral glass. One other thing is bothering me though when I'm reading this is where is the source material? What I mean by this is could we end up with multiple generations of salespeople quoting the same sales tactic or information and we don't actually know because you don't have a source reference? Let me quote something off the website it's brittle oh dear I was sad? Except it's not immune to damage it can crack where shatter under extreme force or impact. So what is the definition of extreme force or impact? Then is that more or less extreme then mineral glass?  Then regarding the price difference while back I had asked the owner where the Sapphire came from and basically wherever he can get the cheapest. So typically ordered from a variety of online supply watch parts in the US and  aliexpress China.. Then yes it does make a difference because we go through a lot of glass crystals and sapphire https://thehorologylab.com/sapphire-crystal-vs-mineral-glass-which-is-best-for-your-watch#google_vignette Then I guess one is glass not glass when it goes by another name? Hardlex Looks like it's purely a Seiko product but now I wonder if other watch companies have their own special glass? I didn't remember from past experience my favorite was people exposed to welding you can find little blobs a metal stuck to the watch case the crystal still intact but there's little burnt holes were bits of metal had actually burnt into the crystal but it was still there. Okay website below starts off with Sapphire sounds good but Apparently it can shatter easier then Hardlex. https://theslenderwrist.com/hardlex-crystal/ One other thing is what I'm reading to websites would be back to I want to see the test results? Often times weren't looking for a subject will find websites where I basically called them these are better than that by the way but sometimes I'll find websites that I will call book review websites were basically the review other websites other material and don't really introduce anything new to the subject. As I said these websites look quite nice which is why I'm giving you a link but where's the test results the definition of extreme how extreme to break a sapphire versus a glass or Hardlex?  
×
×
  • Create New...