Jump to content

Omega Seamaster ETA7754 lubrification pallet stone


Recommended Posts

Hi everyone

Just finished my first amateur full service to movement, case and bracelet polishing, of my 20 years old Omega Seamaster Professional, based ETA7754 (Valjoux 7750). Very happy with outcome!

 

Thanks very much Mark and Lawson for the fantastic walkthrougs!

 

After assembly and tunning the movement was running perfect (see picture) with zero gain, zero bit error and more than 310 of amplitude.

 

After two days I measured it again and the timegrapher is showing some noise, with drop in amplitude to 270 and loosing time.

 

My hypothesis (might be totally wrong): I only oiled the left pallet stone once with Moebius 9415. Could it be lack of lubrification on the pallet stones?

 

Any suggestion on where I should start to triage root cause of this?

 

Many thanks!

Claudio

 

 

cdf0693219ce50c49d3902b09a962d87.jpg04704ad4d757b3c295ba380f2c785af8.jpgc74e5498fb4957fa16c0016cd71e7a38.jpg

 

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Often times a watch needs to "run in" for a day or two before doing any kind of regulating. This gives the oil time to spread and settle and the train to settle back into place. Did you check this the second time on a full wind? It could be a small amount of contamination has settled into one or more of the train/escapement pivot areas. The motion work could also be exerting some resistance, ie the cannon pinion, hour wheel, etc.....I'd check everything under high magnification to start with, then I'd start by removing potential drag items, hands, hour wheel, etc and work backwards from there...I don't believe the oiling of only one pallet stone is the cause, as the oil will still be distributed to the teeth of the escape wheel, and thus the second stone, it just won't be as much oil as if both had been treated.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Does it say 17 jewels on the dial or on the movement ?
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds. 
    • Lots of rust on that hairspring Nev, would you even try to clean it up ?
    • How do you find the working distance from microscope lens to movement? Is it comfortable enough to get tools in?
    • Once you have the collet closer bits off, and the pulley off, there are two nuts on the spindle. These must be removed. There is a large nut in the back of the headstock with two holes, remove this with an appropriate wrench. The front large nut comes off too. The spindle now comes out- but wait- there's more! There is a spacer between the outer races of the bearings; the spindle will almost certainly come out "assembled" with both bearings and this spacer (it can actually come out front or back-ways with the large nuts off the headstock). You have to manage to press out the spindle from the rear bearing, get the spacer off, then remove the front bearing, now you can get to the key.   Imagining you get it all apart without causing any damage to the bearings, now the fun part starts. You must apply preload to the bearings, and this is a very tricky endeavor. Basically once you have the bearings back on, and are in the casting, you snug up the rear nut (one of the two) on the spindle, checking the play of the spindle with at least a 0.002mm reading indicator, until there is zero axial play, then just a little more, then snug up the second nut to lock things in place. Of course snugging up the second nut influences the preload, so you can go back and forth a few times to get it right. Too much preload and bearing life diminishes, too little, and you get poor performance, poor surface finishes, ball skidding, etc.   When I replaced the bearings in one of mine many years ago, I was surprised to find that the bearings were regular deep-groove bearings, but of a higher precision class than normal. I replaced with dimensionally identical angular contact bearings, class P4. In trying to set the preload, I just about lost my mind, so called Barden (the high precision arm of FAG bearing makers, and who made my new ones) and a nice engineer told me that the folks at Leinen were either crazy, or really good- he also said it's 100% A-OK to set up deep groove bearings with preload like this, but best is angular contact. In this bearing setup, the standard way to do it is to have a spacer between the outer races, and another between the inner races. Leinen has the former but not the latter, haha. His advice was to make an inner spacer. The trick is it has to be the exact same length as the outer spacer, within like a micron.  Then you just tighten everything up and the preload is set, because the bearings (the new ones) are ground in a way that they have proper preload in that situation. Easy. Sort of- if you have the means to make the other spacer!   Just to note- Schaublin does the preloading as Leinen did on these on their lathes using angular contact bearings. There is a procedure in the manual, where you tighten the nut until axial play is zero, then a certain number of degrees more. This works on their setup as the nut itself locks without a second nut, and they spent the time to figure it all out in a repeatable way.   I say all this not to scare you off from dismantling your headstock, just to give a heads-up what you're up against to get it back to where it was before.
×
×
  • Create New...