Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have this roamer waiting in line. I'd quite like to pull it apart and see what parts it needs. But before I do that, I'd like to remove the lume.

I've removed the lume from 3 or 4 dials and hand sets so far but I've always done it under water or under IPA to contain the particles. They were all enamel dials though so nice and easy, under water, scrape it off with cocktail sticks, no danger.

This though, I'm not sure how the dial is finished. Also, the markings I believe are printed. I am super cautious of damaging the markings.

I like the patina on the dial even though it's quite heavy. I don't mind if whatever I do improves the patina somewhat but it's not a requirement. I don't want to make it worse though!

Is doing this dial under water a risk? I assume under IPA is a definite risk.

20250124_201213.thumb.jpg.d17da69c97daa40dfd281d0bce9c0872.jpg

Posted

I don't put dials under water. I put cling film on the desk, and work wearing latex gloves and a mask. I use cotton buds or cleaning swabs to wet each number in turn. Let them soak for a while, and the radium paint goes really soft. Then I gently push it off the dial with some sharpened pegwood - picking it up with a cotton bud, which goes in to a zip seal bag with all anything else contaminated for disposal. 

 

  • Like 2
Posted
  On 1/24/2025 at 11:46 PM, mikepilk said:

I don't put dials under water. I put cling film on the desk, and work wearing latex gloves and a mask. I use cotton buds or cleaning swabs to wet each number in turn. Let them soak for a while, and the radium paint goes really soft. Then I gently push it off the dial with some sharpened pegwood - picking it up with a cotton bud, which goes in to a zip seal bag with all anything else contaminated for disposal. 

 

Expand  

Thanks, I'll try that.

I was even considering making up a small makeshift box with a window, like a small disposable sand blasting cabinet, to work inside and contain any particles. But I couldn't shake the feeling it was excessive.

It's easy with enamel dials!

Posted
  On 1/24/2025 at 11:53 PM, graemeW said:

I was even considering making up a small makeshift box with a window, like a small disposable sand blasting cabinet, to work inside and contain any particles. But I couldn't shake the feeling it was excessive.

Expand  

That is excessive. I'm more cautious than many, wearing gloves and a mask.

I initially wipe over the dial with a damp bud to remove any loose particles. Then wet each number in turn. Once damped, there is no danger of bits flaking off. 

Posted

If the lume on the dial is stable enough that you can remove the dial, store it, and then reinstall it on the movement without it crumbling everywhere, then it can be left as is. 

You should still take precautions to capture any flakes that come off the dial during handling, but once the dial is safely reinstalled and cased up in the watch there’s little to worry about. 

Unless you intend to relume a radium dial, there’s no need to remove the radium lume unless it’s degraded to the point that it’s unstable and crumbling away. 

It might even be safer to leave the lume alone, than tackle removing it in a safe and controlled manner that ensures that you capture all of it as it’s removed. 

Of course this is a personal choice, there is no wrong answer, but my own opinion is that radium dials with stable lume are best left alone, unless the dial is to be relumed. 

I know that some people choose to stabilise the radium lume using clear lacquer or other similar means, but I haven’t attempted that. 

Best Regards,

Mark

Posted

People have different views about this. I don't think I'd be comfortable knowing that a watch was adding to the background Radon-222 exposure in my home and that my children might be inhaling it. Sure, the amount from one watch is unlikely to be significant, but the people on this forum don't have just one watch, do they? I'm with @graemeW; I'd get rid of it for peace of mind. (Actually, I have so far actively avoided watches that might have radium lume.)

  • Like 1
Posted

@GPrideauxThere’s certainly never any harm in erring on the side of caution, it is a personal choice. 

That said, unless it is done with care and a understanding, the removal of radium lume from a dial could pose greater risks than leaving it undisturbed.

Safe lume removal could be quite challenging in the case of a dial that isn’t porcelain or ceramic, if you care about preserving the appearance of the dial.

Best Regards,

Mark

Posted (edited)

I am just happier for it not to be there. It's failing. I'll 're lume the watch after.

The other issues, as a beginner, is it may be safe in the case but I'll no doubt have the movement in and put of this case many times. Each time causing more concern.

It's a nag, so I'll just remove it.

 

Edited by graemeW
  • Like 1
Posted

Definitely a personal decision. I decided not to work on watches with radium at all - and as an extension, also not to own any. 

I know it's a bit over-cautions. But I know (from experience) that I can't enjoy radium watches.. 

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 1/25/2025 at 12:31 PM, Knebo said:

Definitely a personal decision. I decided not to work on watches with radium at all - and as an extension, also not to own any. 

I know it's a bit over-cautions. But I know (from experience) that I can't enjoy radium watches.. 

Expand  

This is it. Having that nagging thought in my head, knowing if I take the crystal off, has will escape. Not knowing if lume particles have got to the movement since it was last cleaned, so if regulating, who knows what's getting to you. Then feeling like I need to wash my hands after every time I pick it up.

I'd just rather remove it and 're do the lume.

I understand why people don't buy them, but my interests are pre 1950 watches, and I like military style, so I don't have much choice!

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 1/25/2025 at 12:40 PM, graemeW said:

understand why people don't buy them, but my interests are pre 1950 watches, and I like military style, so I don't have much choice!

Expand  

I know! It's hard for me, too. There are some amazing watches with radium. E.g. I love the "fat lug" Omega Seamaster from thr 50s (ref 2846/2848), but always radium. 

There are three dangers from radium:

- the least: direct radiation from wearing them

- medium: Radon gas emission from the decay of radium (it's suggested keep radium watches in well ventilated rooms) 

- the most: somehow ingesting or inhaling the actual radium when opening cases or working on them. 

  • Like 2
Posted

Took the lume off this today. Went ok I guess, not fantastic though.

The spots of corrosion ment the lume was very stuck in the odd small place. It was also on top of the outline printing. Most came off easy with some water and toothpicks. Some I had to go at with a tiny oiler.

This caused some scratches, but only inside the numbers, and it will be relumed so not a big deal. Still unhappy about it though as it means if I have to do this again, I definitely need to improve technique.

There was also a small amount of loss to the black outlines. Nothing you can see without magnification. Most of the black printing is stuck SOLID, but the dial is obviously corroding underneath the finish so a few areas were weak.

Again, I will hopefully be able to touch them up, and once relumed in a dark aged lume, it will look great.

It's not like the dial is mint, and I don't want it to be anyway.

Movement parts ordered, case measured up, need a bit if brass to make the case and this project can get started! 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I’m not to sure mate! I’ve sent a picture! The crown is off a Tissot 1853 automatic limited edition T115427 A GP19 moto go watch!   
    • For years and I'm still using it I've been using something called SeaMonkey? It's a Mozilla product Basically outscore its Firefox plus an integrated email program. But not the same problems here a lot of times when things are upgraded they tend to be now aimed at very specific browsers like Firefox so I've had to switch to Firefox to respond to any of the messages on the group. So yes they do seem to be getting more browser specific and that may be a reason for others having complications especially if whatever you using hasn't been updated. So yes the world is getting more browser specific perhaps for security reasons. Even though I use a product that is updated on a regular basis is still has problems. So whatever you using for browser should be up to date and if is not recognized it's going to be a problem.
    • I did remember to ask at work and minor complication? Well I suppose technically two separate complications. First off glass mineral glass versus Seiko's Hardlex Glass. Don't know if other companies have their own class or not and a basic class for crystals is probably not the same as window glass it would be more transparent. It becomes obvious if you're looking at a sheet of flat crystal glass versus window glass it's definitely more transparent you can see it when you look at the edges of it window glass looks green. No idea how that changes physical characteristics other than optical. Then we also have thickness like the Seiko five's there crystals are really sick compared to other things and I'm guessing that makes things different. In the first link it talks about Sapphire versus mineral glass. One other thing is bothering me though when I'm reading this is where is the source material? What I mean by this is could we end up with multiple generations of salespeople quoting the same sales tactic or information and we don't actually know because you don't have a source reference? Let me quote something off the website it's brittle oh dear I was sad? Except it's not immune to damage it can crack where shatter under extreme force or impact. So what is the definition of extreme force or impact? Then is that more or less extreme then mineral glass?  Then regarding the price difference while back I had asked the owner where the Sapphire came from and basically wherever he can get the cheapest. So typically ordered from a variety of online supply watch parts in the US and  aliexpress China.. Then yes it does make a difference because we go through a lot of glass crystals and sapphire https://thehorologylab.com/sapphire-crystal-vs-mineral-glass-which-is-best-for-your-watch#google_vignette Then I guess one is glass not glass when it goes by another name? Hardlex Looks like it's purely a Seiko product but now I wonder if other watch companies have their own special glass? I didn't remember from past experience my favorite was people exposed to welding you can find little blobs a metal stuck to the watch case the crystal still intact but there's little burnt holes were bits of metal had actually burnt into the crystal but it was still there. Okay website below starts off with Sapphire sounds good but Apparently it can shatter easier then Hardlex. https://theslenderwrist.com/hardlex-crystal/ One other thing is what I'm reading to websites would be back to I want to see the test results? Often times weren't looking for a subject will find websites where I basically called them these are better than that by the way but sometimes I'll find websites that I will call book review websites were basically the review other websites other material and don't really introduce anything new to the subject. As I said these websites look quite nice which is why I'm giving you a link but where's the test results the definition of extreme how extreme to break a sapphire versus a glass or Hardlex?  
    • What browser are you using Rich? Fine for me using Chrome 
    • Wiggle it back and forth, small steps, keeping the pallet cock as level as possible and take your time (!). You could also use an extra tool as a safeguard at the jewelled end to avoid pressure on the pallet fork. You also mention lubrication... On the pallet fork pivots??
×
×
  • Create New...