Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Working on my Junghans J49 / Alpina 211, the next hurdle after making the balance staff was getting the pallet fork back together. I made a new staff (cylindrical, so I could adjust the height), and after straightening the bend in the pallet fork body, the fork horns and guard finger got along nicely with the roller and jewel. Next step is replacing the jewels. Both are chipped and the entry jewel is (as Nev pointed out) in fact an exit jewel as well. Obviously length and width need to be ok to get them to fit the fork, but what about the angles? The "Watch Repairer's Manual" has a picture showing 103 degrees for the entry jewel and 115 degrees for the exit jewel. Cousins doesn't show angles for these jewels, only the size. Does that mean the 103 and 115 degrees are "standard"? That would be easier then having to grind them to a specific angle..

Posted (edited)

On vintage stuff Seitz replacement pallet jewels are fine. I just measured a couple and got 102 for entry and 114 for exit, pretty close to what Fried wrote.

 

Sometimes the length is an issue, too long and it can be trimmed on the back side, too short and they can still work but are unsightly with a large gap at the back of the slot.

 

On rare occasions I have lapped the face to change the angle slightly, but only on really nice pieces that merited it.

 

Practical Benchwork for Horologists by Samuel and Louis Levin shows a nice way to accurately lap the face on page 196 (link is to an archive.org copy of this awesome book).

Edited by nickelsilver
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, nickelsilver said:

On vintage stuff Seitz replacement pallet jewels are fine. I just measured a couple and got 102 for entry and 114 for exit, pretty close to what Fried wrote.

 

Sometimes the length is an issue, too long and it can be trimmed on the back side, too short and they can still work but are unsightly with a large gap at the back of the slot.

 

On rare occasions I have lapped the face to change the angle slightly, but only on really nice pieces that merited it.

 

Practical Benchwork for Horologists by Samuel and Louis Levin shows a nice way to accurately lap the face on page 196 (link is to an archive.org copy of this awesome book).

Thank you! I have a small Seitz assortment and a lot of vintage loose parts so I should be able to find a replacement. 

Posted

I heard through the grapevine recently that Bergeon has re-stocked the Seitz lineup of jewels across the board- over the last few years suppliers have offered fewer and fewer refs, marking them as "discontinued". I hope that the news is true!

Posted
11 minutes ago, nickelsilver said:

I heard through the grapevine recently that Bergeon has re-stocked the Seitz lineup of jewels across the board- over the last few years suppliers have offered fewer and fewer refs, marking them as "discontinued". I hope that the news is true!

Fingers crossed!🤞

30 minutes ago, nickelsilver said:

I heard through the grapevine

It took me by suprise I must say..😉

Posted

OK, I see You advance with the project. It will be no surprise to me if You will perfectly adjust the escapement from the first attempt, I have such feeling.

Yes, the pallets stones angles are pretty standard and even if the replacement pallet  angle is not exact mach, usually good enough compromise is possible to do in adjustment that will give good result at the end.

First, You need to correctly adjust the banking pins, and for making this You will need to be sure that the guard pin is with correct length and well centered. If You need guidance, ask. My advice is to use banking pins for reference when adjusting the pallets position. Just adjust pallets by leaving small 'run to the banking' on both sides and check what the drop lock will be. As the drop lock may differ on entry and exit pallet, especially if they are not 'pair', evaluation of the drop lock must be done on the pallet where the drop lock is smaller. Usually the result that this way of adjustment gives is good and no additional corrections are needed, but this will get clear in the process. Clean the shellac from the slots of the fork. Adjustment is easy when the pallets fit in the slots tight and stay there firm enough for the movement to be able to work for awhile with no need of shellacking. Use brass tweezers to put the pallets in slots and correct their position

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I have fitted new jewels and adjusted them so the lock depth is about 1/3 of their width. I had to shorten the new entry jewel. For this I hand-drilled a small hole in a piece of pegwood and ground it on a diamondplate. Worked like a charm. Can't wait to see if it will all actually work..

20241018_215451.jpg

20241018_215747.jpg

20241018_220050.jpg

20241018_223636.jpg

  • Like 5

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Righty ho, I re-serviced the chrono module and got a reasonable result with minimal loss of amplitude when not running the chrono and about 30 degrees loss when running. Great. The problem is now that the chrono (and movement) stops running after about a minute or so, a tap on the watch starts it running again. No issues with the movement running when the chrono is stopped. Going to service it yet again, obviously some residual issues with friction in the chrono module (Very frustrating - I wish there was some way of testing it as I go!) I also seem to have a problem with the cannon pinion where the movement is running continuously (with the chrono stopped) but it's losing significant time / stopping. This is one of those two piece ETA style with a driving wheel pressed over the cannon pinion, obviously arranged for driving the chrono module. I had no issues with this prior to service and just added a small amount of grease between the driving wheel and the centre cannon pinion as the technical guide required. What's the best way of tightening these up? I would like to replace it but I guess this is going to be hard to find as it is dedicated to the DD chrono movement. 
    • He uses the micrometer cap, but he leaves the spring out (you can see that in the video). If you leave the spring in, the spindle will move up as well (as shown by @Knebo).
    • Seems like he doesn't have the micrometer cap  attached to the spindle so he can only push down but cannot pull up? If the cap screws into the spindle I guess you don't need the spring? I only have a "normal" Seitz so I really have no idea. 
    • Do you have a part number for the bearing shim lock tool?
    • Yes in my opinion the 3/4HP is plenty but it’s your decision & yes it does come with speed control but foot operation so my reason for changing to potentiometer was because my leg shakes so it was like me revving the lathe & anyway I prefer to set the speed. I & a few others that I recommended the motor to run a Pultra 10mm lathe so if you have a 6 or 8mm B & L then it will be plenty, if you have seen any of my videos you will have seen that when using a graver I run quite slow without any problems. Dell
×
×
  • Create New...