Omega Seamaster, cal.321, CK2907?

[swiss2k]

Greetings everyone, 

 

I have recently acquired this old thing. And now I'm having doubts. Is this an original, an early age dial or is this someones improv? 

 

Thank you in advance

Edited May 21 by swiss2k

[RichardHarris123]

Show us the movement. 

I can't find the dial but it looks genuine to me. 

[swiss2k]

34 minutes ago, RichardHarris123 said:

Show us the movement. 

I can't find the dial but it looks genuine to me. 

Looks like an early 50s dial. But thought I would ask the experts!

Edited May 21 by swiss2k

[RichardHarris123]

In this case, definitely not an expert but comparing the case and the movement?, it looks correct.  

[swiss2k]

12 hours ago, RichardHarris123 said:

In this case, definitely not an expert but comparing the case and the movement?, it looks correct.  

The case and the movement are definitely correct, at least I think so. The dial is my biggest question. I saw some early era dials that look like this one. The lume is interesting… and if its applied back then, then it makes this piece somewhat a bit more interesting? 

Edited May 22 by swiss2k

[RichardHarris123]

I think the lume may of been added by a tinkerer, it looks a bit sloppy. 

[CYCLOPS]

I think it is authentic too, have not seen the back though, the dial was probably refinished at some point, there are few 321 Omega tachometer chronos on Ebay currently that look close.....

[swiss2k]

I probably checked all the images that google had to offer. Not one had such lume. But it looks like one from the early days, so maybe not documented?

Also wondering about its value…
 

1 hour ago, CYCLOPS said:

I think it is authentic too, have not seen the back though, the dial was probably refinished at some point, there are few 321 Omega tachometer chronos on Ebay currently that look close.....

Will add some pictures a bit later. 
 

Also, I will probably go to Omega and ask them what they think.