Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello! Happy horology everyone.

I have worked on a number of movements now: really old, old, new, Chinese, etc., but never came across the shock system shown below. It sorta looks like the offspring of a banjo and a lute. I have also been looking high and low for a regulator as I broke off the pin.

Then I broke off the hairspring stud while removing the balance complet for safe keeping. DOH! There was a fair bit of 'extra' hairspring after the stud, so I may be able to make do with a repair - touchy stuff that.

So, the questions:

  1. What type of shock absorber system is this called? That is really my burning question.
  2. Any thoughts on where to obtain the correct regulator, or a donor movement? I've looked high and low.

I have a beautiful tank style Benrus dial and case to fit the movement if I can get it running.

Best regards - Tom

 

 

FHF_175_anti-shock.JPG

FHF_175_Balance_parts.JPG

Benrus_case_dial_FHF175.JPG

Posted

That configuration is commonly found on Benrus watches using the ETA 930 as the base movement, as seen in the Ranfft database for movements such as the BB4 and CE13:

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&0&2uswk&Benrus_BB4

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&&2uswk&Benrus_CE13

If you can verify the specific base movement, a donor movement should be cheap.  Or maybe you'll find a working spare movement and turn this one into a future donor!

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Geotex said:

That configuration is commonly found on Benrus watches using the ETA 930 as the base movement, as seen in the Ranfft database for movements such as the BB4 and CE13:

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&0&2uswk&Benrus_BB4

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&&2uswk&Benrus_CE13

If you can verify the specific base movement, a donor movement should be cheap.  Or maybe you'll find a working spare movement and turn this one into a future donor!

 

Thank you, I seriously appreciate the reply!

I am still a little confused by "base movement" though. It is a Benrus and is marked FHF 175, should I be looking for an ETA 930?

Also, just for trivia night, is there a specific name for the configuration?

~~Tom

FHF_175_dial_side.JPG

FHF_175_watchmaker_side.JPG

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, RichardHarris123 said:

Look at this, figure 3.

Screenshot_20231013_195320_Chrome.jpg

Screenshot_20231013_195658_Chrome.jpg

Thank you for your reply. 🙂

Yes, I have looked at that numerous times prior to asking my questions; I am not quite sure what you are getting at.

Do you know what that type of shock system is called? It's not incabloc, it's not dinashock, it's not a KIF system, or Monroe*, so what is it called? 🤔 Inquiring minds want to know!

*- I see now you're from across the pond; Monroe was/is a US chain which installed shocks for cars. Just a poor attempt at humor. 😆

Edited by TKM3RD
Clarification
Posted
1 hour ago, dadistic said:

Thank you for your reply, I appreciate it!

Oooo, that's close, but the part over the jewel is a complete circle, and the end screws down.

What is this tome of knowledge you possess? Where may I be enlightened?

8 hours ago, Geotex said:

That configuration is commonly found on Benrus watches using the ETA 930 as the base movement, as seen in the Ranfft database for movements such as the BB4 and CE13:

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&0&2uswk&Benrus_BB4

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&&2uswk&Benrus_CE13

If you can verify the specific base movement, a donor movement should be cheap.  Or maybe you'll find a working spare movement and turn this one into a future donor!

 

I found a donor searching for Benrus AR1, much to my surprise! 😸

Posted

Bestfit Encyclopedia of watch material. That page was posted here on the forum some time ago. I believe there is a pdf copy on the site somewhere, too. Search around a bit and see what pops up.

 

Cheers!

Posted
On 10/12/2023 at 10:17 PM, TKM3RD said:

Hello! Happy horology everyone.

I have worked on a number of movements now: really old, old, new, Chinese, etc., but never came across the shock system shown below. It sorta looks like the offspring of a banjo and a lute. I have also been looking high and low for a regulator as I broke off the pin.

Then I broke off the hairspring stud while removing the balance complet for safe keeping. DOH! There was a fair bit of 'extra' hairspring after the stud, so I may be able to make do with a repair - touchy stuff that.

So, the questions:

  1. What type of shock absorber system is this called? That is really my burning question.
  2. Any thoughts on where to obtain the correct regulator, or a donor movement? I've looked high and low.

I have a beautiful tank style Benrus dial and case to fit the movement if I can get it running.

Best regards - Tom

 

 

FHF_175_anti-shock.JPG

FHF_175_Balance_parts.JPG

Benrus_case_dial_FHF175.JPG

Are you sure this is a shock spring ? Another way of holding a fixed cap jewel ?

On 10/12/2023 at 10:17 PM, TKM3RD said:

Hello! Happy horology everyone.

I have worked on a number of movements now: really old, old, new, Chinese, etc., but never came across the shock system shown below. It sorta looks like the offspring of a banjo and a lute. I have also been looking high and low for a regulator as I broke off the pin.

Then I broke off the hairspring stud while removing the balance complet for safe keeping. DOH! There was a fair bit of 'extra' hairspring after the stud, so I may be able to make do with a repair - touchy stuff that.

So, the questions:

  1. What type of shock absorber system is this called? That is really my burning question.
  2. Any thoughts on where to obtain the correct regulator, or a donor movement? I've looked high and low.

I have a beautiful tank style Benrus dial and case to fit the movement if I can get it running.

Best regards - Tom

 

 

FHF_175_anti-shock.JPG

FHF_175_Balance_parts.JPG

Benrus_case_dial_FHF175.JPG

Is the spring missing ?

Posted
On 10/14/2023 at 1:10 PM, Neverenoughwatches said:

Are you sure this is a shock spring ? Another way of holding a fixed cap jewel ?

Is the spring missing ?

Yes. I am fairly sure, although it appears to multitask and also be a way to secure the cap jewel - look closely at the photos and see what you think. I could be totally wrong. I've only been monkeying with movements for about a year, and what I don't know could fill a book. 🤔

The new old movement arrived and seems to be a decent one. After many searches, I hit on AR1 movement. Funny things, watches and the interwebs. 😆

Posted
8 hours ago, TKM3RD said:

Yes. I am fairly sure, although it appears to multitask and also be a way to secure the cap jewel - look closely at the photos and see what you think. I could be totally wrong. I've only been monkeying with movements for about a year, and what I don't know could fill a book. 🤔

The new old movement arrived and seems to be a decent one. After many searches, I hit on AR1 movement. Funny things, watches and the interwebs. 😆

The part you have labelled as a shock spring looks too solid with no flex to it, Richard's example shows clearly a spring shape design. I've also seen others more like yours but with flexible prongs surrounds its internal diameter. What you have suggests that it just clamps down the jewel plate that the jewel is set into. What is on the otherside of it ?

Posted
17 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

The part you have labelled as a shock spring looks too solid with no flex to it, Richard's example shows clearly a spring shape design. I've also seen others more like yours but with flexible prongs surrounds its internal diameter. What you have suggests that it just clamps down the jewel plate that the jewel is set into. What is on the otherside of it ?

What I have is exactly what Richard and Mr. Marchand show in the patent. Thank you for your input, it's appreciated.

Posted
8 hours ago, TKM3RD said:

What I have is exactly what Richard and Mr. Marchand show in the patent. Thank you for your input, it's appreciated.

Maybe I'm missing something but they don't look the same. Yours is solid richard's example has a clear spring design at it's centerScreenshot_20231018-084938_SamsungInternet.thumb.jpg.5c237ef3243a9e75dae62db3747d9454.jpg

Screenshot_20231018-084844_Samsung Internet.jpg

Screenshot_20231018-084735_Samsung Internet.jpg

Posted

Tom, the configuration found in your watch is listed in the product literature as the "Benrus Special" shock absorber, a very early design. Notice that there is a single screw on the end of a thin extended arm holding the jewel in place, so in effect that whole part is the spring. Benrus refined that type of shock mounting in the next generation, which was called the "Endurable" shock mounting. Similar design, but they added two posts on opposite sides of the screw so that sideways motion was eliminated. (I'm sure that was needed, because when I look over old movements with the "Special" design the cap jewel is often misaligned to the side...) The Endurable also had cutouts around the jewel to add more flexibility, and that appears to be the product that actually arose from the patent Richard provided above, although the posts have been rotated 90 degrees from the patent diagram.  See the Benrus technical catalog listing of their shock systems and part of the Endurable service document below. 

Benrusshock.thumb.jpeg.55a076a1ffec7c9eed50e7d1ab13ea88.jpeg endurable.thumb.jpeg.f7b7b92b36952538f5db8494d5dc93cc.jpeg

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Geotex said:

Tom, the configuration found in your watch is listed in the product literature as the "Benrus Special" shock absorber, a very early design. Notice that there is a single screw on the end of a thin extended arm holding the jewel in place, so in effect that whole part is the spring. Benrus refined that type of shock mounting in the next generation, which was called the "Endurable" shock mounting. Similar design, but they added two posts on opposite sides of the screw so that sideways motion was eliminated. (I'm sure that was needed, because when I look over old movements with the "Special" design the cap jewel is often misaligned to the side...) The Endurable also had cutouts around the jewel to add more flexibility, and that appears to be the product that actually arose from the patent Richard provided above, although the posts have been rotated 90 degrees from the patent diagram.  See the Benrus technical catalog listing of their shock systems and part of the Endurable service document below. 

Benrusshock.thumb.jpeg.55a076a1ffec7c9eed50e7d1ab13ea88.jpeg endurable.thumb.jpeg.f7b7b92b36952538f5db8494d5dc93cc.jpeg

Thanks Geotex, that clears it  up wonderfully .

Posted

Thank you, everyone, for the feedback and wonderful bit of history and learning! This is such a fascinating hobby, albeit a complex one. It's so much appreciated to have such help here.

Thank you all again! Until next time, best regards,

~~Tom

Posted

Well, it was admittedly an imperfect system. Initially there was just a standard cap jewel on the dial side of the balance, but later versions used a cutout cap setting that potentially allowed some flexibility on that side as well. See the two version in the photo. 

IMG_2191.jpeg

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi, this is the first place I found when looking for advice so I hope someone could advise me.  Im completely new to touching watches but I’ve always wondered how they work.  I’ve bought a cheap movement, an ETA replica to take apart and rebuild.  Im thinking I’ll need some screwdrivers, tweezers, movement holder and a loop? My goal is just to have a go first and see if I enjoy it enough before buying more tools.  Do I buy cheap tools for now and get better quality tools later if I enjoy it like I think I will? or will the cheap tools be a pain and take some of the fun out of it?  With quality tools being relatively expensive I’m unsure what to buy.    Any advice would be greatly appreciated!
    • Yeah I have seen 44-56 documented for Elgin 18 size elsewhere. I have the style of gauge that's like a set of feeler gauges and I never noticed before today it is faintly stamped "Elgin". Pictured is the way I have been measuring. I am going to go to a larger jewel than the 42 that had been in there. I recently won an auction on a big set of Fitrite jewels all in the little bottles, to discover that the what's actually in the bottles bears no relation to the chart of sizes printed on the box. In most cases it seems to be all mixed so in fact I have about 24 little bottles and thousands of assorted jewels of all diameters and lengths, which is better than nothing. But since I don't have a micrometer with a table, measuring for the exact diameter will be a big job. Instead I will test a lot of them in the fork slot the same way I measure with the gauge. But this is still the next thing. I have to get the escapement to unlock first.
    • it would be nice to have the exact model of the watch the or a picture so we can see exactly what you're talking about. this is because the definition of Swiss watch could be a variety of things and it be helpful if we could see exactly the watch your dealing with then in professional watch repair at least some professionals they do pre-cleaned watches. In other words the hands and dial come off and the entire movement assembled goes through a cleaning machine sometimes I think a shorter bath perhaps so everything is nice and clean for disassembly makes it easier to look for problems. Then other professionals don't like pre-cleaning because it basically obliterates the scene of the crime. Especially when dealing with vintage watches where you're looking for metal filings and problems that may visually go away with cleaning. Then usually super sticky lubrication isn't really a problem for disassembly and typically shouldn't be a problem on a pallet fork bridge because there shouldn't be any lubrication on the bridge at all as you typically do not oil the pallet fork pivots.  
    • A few things you should find out before you can mske a decision of what to do. As Richard said, what is the crown and all of the crown components made of . Then also the stem .  The crown looks to have a steel washer that retains a gasket. So be careful with what chemicals you use to dissolve any stem adhesives or the use of heat. You might swell or melt the gasket unless you are prepared to change that also . The steel washer maybe reactive to alum. Something I've just used to dissolve a broken screw from a plate. First drilled out the centre of the screw with a 0.5mm carbide . Dipped only the section that held the broken screw in Rustins rust remover. This is 40 % phosphoric acid. 3 days and the screw remains were completely dissolved, no trace of steel in the brass threads. A black puddle left in the solution.
    • I suppose this will add to the confusion I have a roller jewel assortment. It lists out American pocket watches for Elgin 18 size and even 16 size it's a 50. But not all the various companies used 50-50 does seem to be common one company had a 51 and the smallest is 43. American parts are always interesting? Francis Elgin for mainsprings will tell you the thickness of the spring other companies will not even though the spring for the same number could come in a variety of thicknesses. But if we actually had the model number of your watch we would find it probably makes a reference that the roller jewel came in different dimensions. So overlook the parts book we find that? So it appears to be 18 and 16 size would be the same sort of the arson different catalog numbers and as I said we don't have your Mongol know which Log number were supposed to be using. Variety of materials garnered her sapphire single or double but zero mention about diameters. Then in a section of rollers in this case rollers with jewels we do get this down in the notes section Roller specifications but of course zero reference to the jewel size. I was really hoping the roller jewel assortment would give us sizes it doesn't really. But it does show a picture of how one particular roller jewel gauge is used  
×
×
  • Create New...