Jump to content

CWC W10 crystals

Bill241
 Share

Recommended Posts

Bill241 Member

Bill241

Posted
Posted

I’ve just taken delivery of my next project: a 1977 Army issue CWC W10. Like most of these, this is a bit careworn but I’m looking forward to overhauling the ETA 2750, and giving the rather mucky case a thorough clean. It’s a monocoque case design and, from what I’ve seen, unlike similar Seiko and Omega watches, which have movement retaining features incorporated into the case, this relies entirely on the crystal to hold the movement in the case. 

The crystal is a poor fitting replacement and I want to fit something appropriate, with a tension ring. I’d rather not rely on the current crystal as a guide for ordering a new one. Would anyone happen to know which Sternkreuz crystal is appropriate for this model? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rehajm Super WRT Addict

rehajm

Posted
Posted (edited)

Sorry there’s no definitive answer - I’d like to know for certain as well…

I’m in the US but another forum mentioned acquiring cwc crystals from Silvermans in UK? 

…and I don’t know if the CWC crystals are similar to the Smiths W10, which has the chrome ring. For the Smiths I ordered the Sternkreuz ATC (size 316) which looks like the proper dome but the tension ring is chrome. I’ve seen a post where for the CWC they reused the original ring, which I see is not chrome and the original may make a difference in securing the front loader…

The ATC are like 9 quid from Cousins, so you could check your measurements and give it a try…

Edited by rehajm
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bill241 Member

Bill241

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Many thanks. I did ask Silvermans who were most polite but they don’t support these older watches now. They pointed me in the direction of a certain watch repairer but I’m confident I can do it myself. It’s keeping good time but with an amplitude below 200 degrees so a clean, new mainspring and fresh oil should help. 

Here’s a photo of the watch with the incorrect crystal. With the aid of air pressure delivered via syringe, I’ve just popped it off to have a look. There’s no tension ring and my vernier caliper reads 30.5mm, so I’ve ordered a Sternkreuz ATC 305. The chrome ring might stand out but will be a reassuring reminder that the glass and movement won’t fall out any time soon! 

 

IMG_0144.jpeg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • RichardHarris123
      Introducing myself

      By RichardHarris123 · Posted

      Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 
    • RichardHarris123
      Good evening and hello there.

      By RichardHarris123 · Posted

      Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 
    • eccentric59
      Breitling Navi Heritage (ETA 2892A2) seconds subdial skippiness...

      By eccentric59 · Posted

      The fact that the seconds runner starts running smoothly when you engage the chrono seconds makes me think the clutch is out of adjustment. That's a guess because I can't seem to find out too much about the chronograph module Breitling used on this model. On other Navitimers they used the Valjoux 7750 which had the running seconds on the left where the hand was mounted on an extended pivot on the fourth wheel. It looks to me that whatever pinion is driving that wheel is skipping teeth. Given that Breitling (et al) is not forthcoming with manuals or parts, I would send it back and ask for expedited service. They should be sufficiently embarrassed to do that for you at least.
    • HectorLooi
      First Project Already A Bit "Sideways"

      By HectorLooi · Posted

      Looks like someone forced in a screw that was bigger than the hole.  You would probably need to drill it out with a tungsten carbide rod sharpened at the tip to look like a spade drill. I'll see if I can find a video on how to make one. Start with a 0.5mm rod, then work your way up in 0.1mm increments until the walls of the hole weaken the screw enough to break it up.  This is a very time consuming, slow process. You'll need to centre the hole properly and not deviate. WD40 helps. The other option is to abandon the hole and use a dial dot. As much as I hate dial dots, this might be the safest option for a beginner.  Ok, found it.  
    • DDean
      First Project Already A Bit "Sideways"

      By DDean · Posted

      For those who are, curious I broke out the macro lens and took a few shots.  I'm attaching four of them: Image 1 is from the watchmaker's side and generally shows the problem area. Image 2 is a detail view of the offending dial foot hole (called out with the green circle), the tip of the offending screw (orange arrow) and the blue line indicates the approximate position of what's left of the head of the screw (determined by using an oiler as a feeler gauge to transfer that measurement to the visible portion of the plate.) Image 3 is looking down the screw hole you can see the head of the broken screw at the bottom. Image 4 is the same, but with less contrast to give a better appreciation of the condition of that end of the screw. I can almost convince myself that I can see the remains of the screw slot in the head, but I have to use alot of imagination in that exercise. Heard and understood.  There does appear to be a steel locating pin that can be seen in the lower, right center of Image 1 (right "above" the oval shaped slot that is to the left of where the pinion/clutch parts of the keyless works nestle into the plate.)  As I don't see a way to remove that I'd have to keep it out of the solution and have even contemplated dropping a little paraffin on it to give it a "rain coat" of sorts.  As I missed that before I did the closeup photos, I feel that I'm going to be looking at this plate in much greater detail to see if there anything else I might have missed. The screw assortments seem like a good acquisition.  The eBay seller who has the donor movements I was looking at never replied so I may just take a chance and get one of those as well a screw assortment.  They do seem like they'd be handy.  I have to confess that the idea of fabricating the needed screws appears to some deep part of my soul, I also have to confess that I do not yet have either the equipment, or the skill to use it.  Perhaps one day, but that day has not arrived (and I have alot of pricey bits and bobs that I will likely need to get along the way.) I thought about this, but the dial foot screw doesn't seem to be wide enough to get the thing out if I could advance it into the hole.  I suppose that I could try and take it out in pieces (advance it as far as it will go, get in there with some sort of saw, take a piece off, walk it forward again, take another piece, etc) but that seems like alot of risk to the main plate. I need to examine the other screw to ensure it doesn't have a shoulder or something that would prevent me from doing something like that.  However, all that said, I've been unable to get the thing to move at all. In general, this whole piece feels like someone had it before me, did a bad job of working on it and ultimately just bunged it all back together in a haphazard way and passed it on to be someone else's problem.
×
×
  • Create New...